Regional security in hands of emerging regional powers: Kharazi

2017/12/04 | Council, News

TEHRAN, Dec. 04 – Head of Strategic Council on Foreign Relations underlined that the sole way to provide Iran’s security in the region is strengthening the defense power, national sovereignty and cooperation with Resistance Front.

Kamal Kharazi, who was addressing the opening ceremony of “Regional Security in West Asia: Emerging Challenges and Trends” conference in Tehran on Sunday as keynote speaker, briefly emphasized the importance of Middle East from geopolitical, economic and political point of views.

“Security has always been a concern in the region due to aforementioned causes; yet the security concerns of regional states are interwoven and you cannot separate them in this regard, meaning that every country’s national security is defined within the frame of regional security; therefore considering the regional security is a vital concern for every country,” former Iranian foreign minister said while noting the security issues in Middle East.

“World powers, after establishing the Zionist regime and leaving the region, prioritize the support for allies, arming them and suppressing the popular movements of the region on their foreign policy; yet the equations faded away as Islamic Revolution emerged, which was not only independent of powers, but also against them,” he reaffirmed.

Kharazi underlined that despite all plots including coups, war and sanctions, Islamic Republic flourished and became a role model for countries of the region to fight against the occupiers; “the next step was forming terrorist and extremist groups by western powers under the leadership of the US and support from Saudi Arabia and UAE; but all efforts failed as it led to Iran’s more influence in the region.”

“Saudis started establishing bases in all Islamic countries to promote Wahhabi thoughts; the Takfiri – Wahhabi forces trained in the bases started operations in Iraq, Egypt and Syria and were successful in occupying large parts of the countries under the financial and arm support of Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Turkey as well as political and logistic support of US and Israeli regime;  but their main target was Iran,” Mr. Kharazi noted.

He continued “Syrian and Iraqi governments officially asked for help of Iran; with help of Hezbollah and Popular Mobilization Forces the plot was foiled while Iran gain a significant influence; US, Israeli regime and their Arab allied were the losers as they failed to threaten Iran’s security despite the huge costs.”

“Therefore, I have to say, the security of the countries in the region depends to one another; also, the future of regional security lies in cooperation and interaction between governments and newly-emerged identities and trends; no one can deny the role and power of Iranian mobilized forces and IRGC, Iraqi PMF, Syrian popular forces, Lebanese Hezbollah and Yemeni Ansarullah in the region, the emerging powers that would take very vital roles in establishing region’s security and stability in the future just as they proved their capabilities in fight against terrorism,” Kharazi asserted.

“During this intense war, the role of European states was decisive; while strongly worried on infiltration of terrorists to Europe, they did no serious act against the terrorism due to support they have for Israeli regime and certain Arab states in the region and following US policies; the international coalition was also a funny show including the states who has created ISIL and al-Nusra themselves; the sole trans-regional power who fought terrorism seriously and played an important role in defeating them was Russia,” he stated.

Kharazi underlined that despite relatively stable conditions in Iraq and Syria, a new round of anti-Resistance efforts are on the agenda with Saudi Arabia as the leading country; “pushing Saad Hariri to resign, prolongation of support for terrorists in Syria, putting pressure on Shias in Bahrain, continuing war in Yemen, and normalization of ties with Israeli regime are all indicators; my prediction is that the fight between Resistance Front countries and US allies would continue; but there’s hope that Resistance would not allow the power balance to change in favor of the anti-Resistance.”

“I have to say there is no hope for establishment of a collective mechanism on security in the region as there are undemocratic and authoritarian states in the region; without such a mechanism the region would continue to suffer from security issues as every regional power is seeking its own interests and tries to develop its own power; given that, the sole way for Islamic Republic to safeguard its security is to reinforce its defense might, to develop its national sovereignty through national unity and help strengthen the Resistance front; the strategy, naturally needs active and efficient diplomacy to stabilize the outcomes of battle fields on political arena as well,” he concluded.

 

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

Loading