Political perspective of 3rd Political Trend in Pakistan

2018/09/04 | Opinion, political, Publications

Strategic Council online - Although several months prior to the Pakistani parliamentary elections, it was anticipated that the two powerful parties of Pakistan, People Party (PPP) led by Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari and Muslim League-Nawaz (MLN) headed by Shahbaz Sharif will not win the elections, but it was hardly believed that a third trend will emerge in Pakistani political arena.

Mohammad Reza Asgari Moroudi – Senior Analyst in Asian Issues

In the political history of Pakistan, power has been held alternatively between two prominent political parties of PPP and MLN.

The victory of the Imran Khan-led Tehreek-e-Insaf Party (PTI) in the recent parliamentary election showed that the Pakistani people left behind other parties trusted Imran Khan and confided the responsibility of administering the country to him.

Although PTI failed to gain the majority seats in the parliament and has to coalesce with other parties in the parliament in order to set up a government, it managed to stand for the first time on the top row of parliamentary election voting list, high above other powerful parties.

Given a new approach of Imran Khan in the domestic and foreign arena which will be different from the past, the expectation has risen that the future government, led principally by PTI, will introduce new policies in both areas.

Imran Khan’s remarks at the first news conference after his victory revealed that he is going to pursue new policies in contrary to the established ones, which according to the PTI leader, could be a turning point in Pakistan’s history.

Fighting against corruption at all levels was Imran Khan’s most significant promise during the election campaign, a motto that encouraged the Pakistani people to cast their vote in favor of his party.

Iran-Pakistan future relations

Also, by scrutinizing Pakistan foreign policy of the past two decades and raising issues about the structure and quality of the country’s relations with its neighbors and certain transnational actors, Imran Khan has promised changes in Islamabad’s diplomatic strategies.

The insistence of the PTI leader on expanding relations with Tehran indicates his robust determination to strengthen cooperation with Iran because of Tehran’s honest role in helping to provide security in the region and also due to Iran’s status as a reliable trade and economic partner for Islamabad.

 As a major energy producer in the world, Iran can play a decisive role in supplying the required energy for Pakistan. It is for the same reason and due to various political considerations that Imran Khan believes that development of relations between Pakistan and Iran is inevitable and has pinned hope to Iran in supplying Pakistan’s sustainable energy to help Islamabad to exit its energy crisis.

Considering the status quo, it is anticipated that the future Pakistani government under PTI leadership will take steps towards developing relations with Iran, particularly in carrying out the gas pipeline project which stopped by the previous governments under the pressure of the United States.

Another key issue in bilateral relations is terrorist attacks along the common borders from the Pakistan territory into Iran which the future Islamabad government is expected to take effective measures to root out the threats and create greater convergence in jointly providing security.

Opposition to the US unilateral policies

As for the future of Pakistan’s relations with the US, with regard to Imran Khan’s positions of previous years, especially his opposition to the US unilateral policies such as US drone attacks on the tribal areas of Pakistan, it is speculated that he is willing to adopt policies independent of Washington and focus on securing national interests.

On future relations with Afghanistan, Imran Khan offered a position different from the past which could be interpreted as a fundamental change.

Contrary to what former Pakistani officials believed in describing the country as the principal victim of terrorism in the region, Imran Khan chose a different approach, considering Afghanistan as the greatest victim of extremism, a position which could have a meaningful impact on creating a positive psychological atmosphere in the tense relations between Kabul and Islamabad.

From the viewpoint of Imran Khan, the challenges and tensions in Pakistani relations with its neighbors led to heavy costs for the country, and once Islamabad’s foreign policy takes the path of détente, the Pakistani government can further focus on domestic affairs, especially on putting the country’s economy in order.

Based on such valuable considerations, the leaders of Afghanistan and India welcomed the victory of the PTI party in the Pakistani parliamentary election, and Afghan President Mohammed Ashraf Ghani invited Imran Khan to visit Afghanistan.

The Afghan government believes that Pakistan plays an important role in the success or failure of the Kabul plan in fighting or negotiating with the Taliban as the main armed group opposing the Kabul government, and it will not be possible to establish peace in Afghanistan unless Islamabad aligns its policies with those of Kabul.

Also, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi congratulated Imran Khan in a phone call and welcomed the expansion of bilateral ties.

Conclusion

Under these circumstances, it is expected that Imran Khan who plans to introduce a new arrangement in coalition with some other parties consisting of foreign policy decision-makers, will be able to encourage the Pakistani army to cooperate with him in pursuit of materializing his ideals in a new era of building trust in the diplomatic arena. In this context, the Saudis will do their utmost to align Pakistan with its positions on regional issues, including distancing from Iran, although it seems that geopolitical status of Islamabad-Tehran and their common interests will prevent Riyadh from implementing its policies.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading