Reasons Why Lausanne Treaty Is Important for Turkey & Greece

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: On the occasion of the 99th anniversary of the Treaty of Lausanne, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan announced in a statement that the Greek side has ignored the terms recorded in the Treaty and deliberately destroyed the agreement, especially regarding the rights of the Turkish Muslim minority in that country. Mahmoud Fazeli - Analyst of international issues

The president of Turkey announced that the country is determined to ‘use all its efforts to establish permanent peace and stability in the region and defend the rights of its people. Turkey cannot accept such conditions, which contradict the good neighborly relations and the principle of adherence to the signed treaty.’
The Treaty of Lausanne is one of the basic documents of the Republic of Turkey, through which its land borders were determined, withdrawals were canceled and the rights of the Turkish minority in Greece were guaranteed. Ankara has carefully monitored implementation of that agreement for the past 99 years. Turkey will continue to strengthen its active position in regional and global issues simultaneously with taking strong steps towards 2023, the 100th anniversary of the Lausanne Peace Treaty and establishment of the Republic of Turkey.
The 1923 treaty was signed by the new Republic of Turkey to settle disputes with the Allies, including Greece, after the World War I and the Turkish War of Independence. The document outlines the rights of the remaining Muslim minority in Greece and Christians in Turkey after the intense conflict between the two countries.
It also sets the conditions for Greek sovereignty over the Aegean islands off the coast of Turkey. Ankara worries about the militarization of the islands and Greece’s violation of the treaty, but Athens says it is acting in accordance with international law and defending its territory against Turkey’s continued hostility.
Greek Muslims, Turks, Romans, and Bulgarian-speaking Pomaks, are one of the main differences between the two countries. Turkey says there are 150,000 people of “Turkish descent” living in the region, while Greece insists that they are 120,000 “Greek Muslims”.
Turkey believes that the Muslim minority is constantly under pressure from the Greek government institutions, and it has considered the closure of four Muslim minority schools in Greece as an example.
Tensions between Turkey and Greece have recently increased again over airspace and the status of non-military islands in the Aegean Sea. After the Greek prime minister’s attempt to prevent the sale of F-16 fighter planes to Turkey in the US Congress, Erdoğan emphasized in his rare position that ‘the prime minister of Greece no longer exists for him’.
Relations between Turkey and Greece, two NATO members, have often been strained, and last year those relations deteriorated severely with warships clashing in eastern Mediterranean over maritime borders and energy rights.
Turkey believes that the purpose of Greece’s behavior in recent years is to wear out the Lausanne Treaty, because it has not complied with the provisions of the treaty and its purpose is to take over some islands by creating a few-day crisis.
On the anniversary of the Treaty of Lausanne in 1923, which both countries consider a political victory over their neighbor and regional rival, the long-standing differences between the two sides continue and there is no a clear prospect for resolving such differences. According to Turkey, despite all kinds of impossibilities, betrayals and difficulties, the country fought to achieve independence and achieved victory. This victory has been confirmed on the international stage by the Lausanne Peace Treaty.
Greece considers Turkey’s argument regarding the delivery of the Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean islands to Greece according to the Lausanne Treaty and the non-military nature of those islands as baseless and wrong in terms of law and history. Greece’s sovereignty over the islands of the eastern Aegean Sea is fully confirmed in Article 12 of the treaty. Greek sovereignty is not subject to any obligation including the demilitarization of the islands, and there is no mention of the words such as “demilitarization”, “demilitarizing,” or “state of demilitarizing”.
The Treaty of Lausanne, which was signed on July 24, 1923 in the city of Lausanne, Switzerland, was accepted as the founding document of the Republic of Turkey, and this agreement recognizes Turkey as an independent and sovereign country, the effects of which continue.
The Treaty of Lausanne is the name of the peace treaty that was signed between the representatives of the Turkish Parliament on the one hand and Britain, France, Italy, Japan, Greece, Romania, Bulgaria, Portugal, Belgium and Yugoslavia on the one hand. The process of Lausanne negotiations began on November 20, 1922, and Turkey was asked to compromise on “capitulation” and “Armenian government”. Such negotiations were stopped on February 4, 1923 due to issues related to the straits, capitulation, debts of the Ottoman government, and the status of the cities of Mosul and Kirkuk.
After the World War II, 12 islands were given to Greece. The issue of the straits was one of the issues discussed in Lausanne, which was resolved by the Montreux Convention, signed on July 20, 1936. According to the Lausanne Agreement, foreign schools were established in the borders of the Turkish government according to Turkish laws, and the curriculum of the above schools was regulated by the Turkish government.
Apart from the Greeks living in Istanbul, other Greeks were sent from Turkey to Greece, and in addition to the Turks of Western Thrace (located in Greece), all the Turks also returned to Turkey, and thus the population exchange between the two countries took place. After the First World War and population exchanges, the Turkish minority still lives in Western Thrace, who were recognized as a minority according to the Lausanne Treaty.
Greece claims to be fully committed to international law and the protection of human rights, and implements its obligations arising from the Lausanne Treaty, which explicitly and clearly refers to the Muslim minority in Greece. Turkey’s continuous efforts to “distort the reality” as well as the country’s claims of “not protecting the rights of those citizens or discriminating against them” are baseless, and Greece fully implements the provisions of the Lausanne Treaty regarding the Muslim minority of that region.

1 Comment

  1. Both countries are democracies and NATO-Allies. So people- regardless of origin – are equal citizens and can have dual citizenship according to modern-day standards. This is the 21th century.

    I don’t understand how these treaties go along with a post-WWII order and NATO. Turkey did not take part in WWII- which speaks for this country. Others were forced to self-defence.

    The current militarization of the island is supported by Central Europe, as a Turkish TV channel reported. Or to name it as in the report: It is proven to be German military equipment. My personal belief: These are out-dated Eastern German weapons, acting like Imperial Germany in WWI

    To put it short:

    But today seeking to replace NATO by EU defence and to create a divide between Islam and Christianity. To fill another 40-50 years with conflicts harming us all, while Germany built new skyscraper cities. Not wanting us to live well. Wanting to spread German over-population with over 130 Million people across regions by illegal settlements and fake identities.

    Finally, this reminds me of the war in the Balkans in the 1990s. Yugoslavia broke up and more wars/conflicts followed in that region, reaching into the mid-2000. Than Eastern European counrty were granted EU accession.

    Both sovereign countries, Turkey and Greece, need to terminate the treaties.

    In democracies it is also legitimate to say you don’t meet our immigration regulations. İt is possible to avoid illegal settlements, even under EU regulations as a sovereign.

    The EU supposed to promote the economy and other industries, but I think it failed because of Eastern German ventures.

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading