Corona Vaccine & World Powers Monopolistic & Discriminatory Strategy

Strategic Council Online - Although the sources of vaccine production came from people who saw their aid as a donation to save humanity, but with Western governments taking control of these resources, they have been given the tools of power to determine "who should live and who should not." Abed Akbari - International Affairs Analyst

In development, as the second pillar of the United Nations, the experience of racism and discrimination is not new, especially in global health. As in the first and third pillars, namely security and human rights, there are all kinds of inequalities. Nevertheless, the race to overcome the Covid-19 crisis and get the vaccine has once again unveiled the bitter reality of discrimination. Corona and quarantine seem to be an opportunity for morality and philosophy of life to emerge, but today, with the decline of multilateralism, the collapse of coalitions for the cause of self-interest, and the enduring forms of colonialism, we face an increasingly immoral world in which human beings are unequally equated. He has grown tall.

The present paper is a flip to point to some aspects of neo-colonialism in the wake of the corona vaccine, which suggests that dialogue and diplomacy should be expanded to better see the world through the eyes of the “other,” non-Western, underdeveloped or low-income countries and the rule breaking of the prevailing power discourse on the methods of corona vaccine production and distribution would prevent the world from repeating its colonial history over and over again.

Hidden Layers of Colonial Revival in Production & Distribution of Corona Vaccines & Even in Disease Treatment

The approach of developed countries in the course of scientific research on the corona pandemic and their policies for distribution of vaccines are objective examples of neo-colonial practices. In global research, especially on the status of vaccines or diseases in less developed countries, there is a serious disregard for the presence of scientists from low-income countries. Obviously, not only is the absence of thinkers from low-income countries in the study of their countries questionable, but this absence itself will lead to the continuation of backwardness and the colonial cycle.

The World Health Organization’s initial guidelines for combating corona were also presented with a global assumption of the middle class forgetting the plight of poor communities: the impossibility of social distancing in large populations; Lack of access to soap, detergent and even water and quarantine in countries with multiple wage workers. These impossible solutions mean that the World Health Organization has no understanding of the way many people in the world live.

Vaccine Testing & Monopoly by Coalition of Powers

In April 2020, a French scientist on national television suggested testing a vaccine prototype in Africa that did not respect WHO guidelines. Although the idea has once again called into question France’s credibility in the field of colonialism, with many protests around the world, one African official pointed to a more painful fact: “Who in the world is going to prevent this human experiment from taking place?”

Human trials of the corona vaccine were not limited to Africa. Trump shipped two million doses of the US vaccine to Brazil, and just days later, the vaccine was suspended in the United States. There is also a lack of human perspective in the colonial outlook of the Vaccine Coalition of France, the Netherlands, Germany and Italy, which emphasize Europe’s priority on access to the vaccine and its inhumane monopoly. A part of the German government’s statement shows “giving a share of the vaccine to Africa” ​​and this familiar view of Christian missionaries to Africa, the land of “salvation” of the West. These promises are made not out of good faith, but in an effort to prevent the colonization of the vaccine monopoly.

The second aspect of colonialism is how to legalize the exclusive use of the resources of charities and public funds sponsoring the pharmaceutical industry and research universities to ensure priority access to a possible Covid-19 vaccine. In other words, although the sources of vaccine production came from people who saw their aid as a donation to save humanity, but with Western governments taking control of these resources, they have been given the tools of power to determine “who should live and who should die.”

An Opportunity for Thinking & Diplomacy

In the debate about neo-colonialism, no conclusions can be drawn and goodwill presented. You have to think and think of a way to end discrimination and inequality. Undoubtedly, today the production and distribution of corona vaccine has become an important geopolitical tool and has once again highlighted the geographical importance of the presence. In this environment, diplomacy and dialogue are an alternative to the prevailing discourse of power, which not only dominates unbalanced structures, but increasingly reproduces them. Diplomatic practice can expose the fabricated reality of power by expressing the views of the “other” and objecting to the existing trend.

Diplomatic dialogue is a groundbreaking process to realize the depths of inequality and imbalance for nations vulnerable to inequality. The habit of seeing inaccuracies and not realizing their existence will only be overcome in promoting alternative discourses, because under global domination of power, everything from vaccine monopoly and unequal distribution as the right of producing countries to impractical approaches proposed by the World Health Organization can be justified.

Exposing the approach of the West and international organizations provides an opportunity to think responsibly about our position in the international arena. This thinking does not mean getting off the world train all at once; it is presenting the image from one’s point of view to the world, the most important benefit of which can be recognizing one’s identity and existence and protecting it from the prevailing discourse. Undoubtedly, thought and protest do not mean opposition, but avoiding alienation and becoming a plaything in the hands of the discourse of power.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading