Expansion of Saudi-UAE Crimes Dimension in Yemen

2020/11/02 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: Three major crimes have been registered in the Saudi-UAE war record; the first is crimes against humanity, the second ethnic cleansing, and the third is genocide, each of which reflects some of the dimensions of Saudi crimes in the war against Yemen. Jafar Qanadbashi - Expert on West Asia Issues

It was almost five and a half years ago when Saudi and the UAE officials resorted to military means and launched a large-scale air, ground and sea military offensive after the scandalous defeats they suffered in the Yemeni political scene and failed to change the political situation inside the country in their own favour. The Riyadh and Abu Dhabi authorities resorted to a military solution on the one hand as part of efforts to prevent the Islamic Awakening from spreading to Yemen and on the other hand to prevent the establishment of a popular democracy in their southern neighbour.

Therefore, this war against Yemen was completely different from other wars in the West Asian region; because the Yemeni side not only did not intend to go to war with Saudi Arabia but also due to the developments stemming from the Islamic Awakening lacked any military readiness to confront the invading forces led by Saudi Arabia.

In fact, this made the human dimension of this war and its very negative consequences against the Yemeni people more prominent than other contemporary wars; because this military invasion did not target the Yemeni military areas and the military itself, but the aggressors by putting all kinds of military pressure on the Yemeni people tried to prevent them from democracy and anti-hegemonic movements. In other words, the Yemeni war was a military war under the command of reactionary dictators in the region against the people who, on the one hand, had risen up against the dictatorial regime in Yemen and opposed any intervention by Saudi Arabia and other Western agents in their country on the other hand.

The Saudi-UAE war record lists three major international crimes, each of which is highly inhumane; the first is crimes against humanity, the second is ethnic cleansing, and the third is genocide, each of which reflects some of the dimensions of Saudi crimes in the war against Yemen. During the five-and-a-half-year imposed war, Riyadh and Abu Dhabi attacked most of Yemen’s residential areas and cities. Hundreds of hospitals, mosques as well as thousands of schools and educational centres and many other public institutions were destroyed in these criminal attacks.

According to the observers, this amount of destruction has never been seen in any of the contemporary wars. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia and the UAE, with the help and support of Western armies, imposed the most severe blockades on Yemen in the recent years and increased the scope of sanctions to the point that the Yemeni people faced the most severe famines and shortages in the field of medicine and food.

The scope of such crimes was so wide that the United Nations, despite pressure from Western countries, was finally forced to expose some of the dimensions of the humanitarian catastrophe in Yemen and point out the crimes committed against the Yemeni people in this regard. In fact, the phrase “crime against humanity” as one of the major crimes of Saudi Arabia and the UAE in Yemen was not and is not a propaganda title based on war propaganda, but it refers to the very bitter facts that Riyadh committed in its imposed war against the Yemeni people. In addition, it is worth mentioning the case of those wounded in the war and the process of their treatment, which Saudi Arabia and the UAE never allowed to provide treatment for tens of thousands of wounded, most of whom were Yemeni children and women.

Even the International Committee of the Red Cross was not allowed to be present in Yemen and help the great number of injured. Of course, what was done by Saudi Arabia and the UAE in the form of these great crimes and these international crimes against the Yemeni people should be considered within the context of colonial and Zionist policies that have tried to realize their targets by fanning the flames of the Yemeni war which is a proxy or advocacy war. In this area, Saudi Arabia and the UAE acted as gendarmes in the service of the West and the Zionist regime, demanding that their strategic targets in the Red Sea and the very strategic Bab al-Mandeb Strait be realized.

Now, more than ever, it is clear that not only have the regimes of these two Arab countries not achieved any result out of the large-scale military invasion of Yemen but astonishingly faced with a war-torn country, which now by resorting to the missile and drone capabilities, has challenged the entire military capabilities of Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Despite enduring tens of thousands of casualties and hundreds of thousands of wounded, it has shown the most unparalleled success in defending the Yemeni people and its territory, but however, compensating for the crimes committed by the Saudi coalition in Yemen, it takes years and they have to take responsibility for the consequences.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading