Saudi Misunderstanding of Realities in Pakistan

2020/09/20 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Regional and global conditions are changing; but Riyadh is reluctant to accept the changes and still intends to traditionally hold control over Pakistan. In the meantime, the situation has changed in Pakistan and the country is gradually leaving the Western clique and entering into the Chinese circle. Abdolreza Farajirad – Expert in Geopolitical Issues

The relationship between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia is an old and strategic one; relations between the two countries became much closer especially from the time of Zia-ul-Haq onwards, and notably during the reign of Nawaz Sharif, which was relatively long, and at the time of Parviz Musharraf. It is even said that Pakistan has been involved and is active in the Saudi nuclear case and has its forces in that country. Pakistan has also sent a large number of workforce to the Persian Gulf region, especially to Saudi Arabia. This workforce transfers about 8 billion dollars annually from the Persian Gulf region to Pakistan which plays a very effective role in the lives of the people of that country. Saudi Arabia has also invested in various sectors in Pakistan, including agriculture.

But since Nawaz Sharif stepped down and Imran Khan took office, we have seen the Pakistani Prime Minister is trying to pursue a policy to expand Islamabad’s relations with all countries in the region. Simultaneously, he has been interested in maintaining strong ties between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia and to this end he made his first visit to Riyadh.

At this juncture two expectations were developed; on the one hand, Saudi Arabia was not interested in seeing Imran Khan to get close to Iran. In fact, the incumbent Prime Minister of Pakistan, unlike Nawaz Sharif, has adopted an independent and freedom-loving spirit. Even when he planned to visit Saudi Arabia, he said Islamabad intended to develop relations with Tehran, which did not and will not please Riyadh.

Pakistan, on the other hand, expected Saudi Arabia to support the Kashmir issue due to its influence in the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, but Saudi Arabia was reluctant to do so, as the Persian Gulf states have very good relations with India and many Indian workforce are working in those countries; therefore, this issue caused annoyance and the Pakistani Foreign Minister complained to Saudi Arabia that if Riyadh decided to continue such an attitude, it will have a negative impact on the friendship and relations between the two countries. This issue deprived the Pakistani defense minister of meeting with Bin Salman during his visit to Saudi Arabia.

Therefore, with regard to these annoyances, Saudi Arabia now claims that Pakistan should repay the loan given to it by Riyadh. This means that relations between the two countries are strained and that there is less understanding between Riyadh and Islamabad than before.

Under these circumstances, Imran Khan took the middle ground and tried to mediate between Iran and Saudi Arabia with an aim of resolving the problem in their relations; because if the relationship between Tehran and Riyadh improves, naturally the problem of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan will be solved as well.

But despite all such efforts, we still see that the relations between Riyadh and Islamabad are not the same as before, and Imran Khan is not willing to listen to Saudi Arabia, like Nawaz Sharif, to implement Saudi policies. At present, although the relations between Saudi Arabia and Turkey are not good at all, the Prime Minister of Pakistan is considered a close friend of Ankara and even intends to further develop relations with Turkey. In the case of Iran, Imran Khan also follows the same policy.

In fact, Saudi Arabia intends to implement the same plan it had with Qatar with Pakistan as well and have this country to implement the policies of Riyadh and Abu Dhabi; but Imran Khan is unlikely to succumb to such pressures.

Of course, this strain in relations should not be assessed in the direction that Pakistan is interested in downgrading its relations with Saudi Arabia; because Islamabad, while being interested in maintaining its relations with Riyadh, also seeks independence and intends to have a growing and good relationship with Iran and Turkey. At present, an atmosphere has emerged for Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan to work closely with each other in the light of Qatar’s peace talks in relation to Afghanistan.

Meanwhile, Pakistan has also strategic relations with China and Iran is expected to implement a 25-year comprehensive cooperation agreement with Beijing in the near future, and such relations will be complementary to each other. Thus the situation in the region and the world is changing; but Riyadh is reluctant to accept such changes and intends to traditionally hold control over Pakistan. In the meantime, the situation has changed in Pakistan and the country is gradually leaving the Western clique and entering into the Chinese camp.

Finally, if Iran and Pakistan manage to develop their relationship to such an extent that at least a significant portion of the income Pakistan obtains from Saudi Arabia can be obtained from Iran, and Iran reciprocally could take advantage of Pakistan’s 210 million population for its exports and economic cooperation, no doubt Islamabad could more easily avoid the pressures of Riyadh and pursue its independent relations with other countries.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

An Analysis of the Recent Elections in Turkey

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Turkey’s March 31 local elections, which ended with the opposition’s victory and Erdogan’s party’s defeat, is considered an important “decisive point” in the future of Turkey’s domestic and foreign policy developments.
It determines the fate of several important political issues, in addition to the election of mayors and local managers for the next five years.
Hamid Khosayand – expert on regional issues

The strategy of the Israeli regime to get rid of the defeat in Gaza

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: It has been about six months since the Israeli regime attacked the Gaza Strip in October 2023. In the initial weeks and months of the attack, many analysts believed that the Israeli regime, based on its usual practice in wars after the Palestinian intifada, would agree to a truce and end the war after inflicting multiple casualties and damages.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University professor

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

An Analysis of the Recent Elections in Turkey

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Turkey’s March 31 local elections, which ended with the opposition’s victory and Erdogan’s party’s defeat, is considered an important “decisive point” in the future of Turkey’s domestic and foreign policy developments.
It determines the fate of several important political issues, in addition to the election of mayors and local managers for the next five years.
Hamid Khosayand – expert on regional issues

The strategy of the Israeli regime to get rid of the defeat in Gaza

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: It has been about six months since the Israeli regime attacked the Gaza Strip in October 2023. In the initial weeks and months of the attack, many analysts believed that the Israeli regime, based on its usual practice in wars after the Palestinian intifada, would agree to a truce and end the war after inflicting multiple casualties and damages.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University professor

Loading