Importance, Consequences of Joint Armenia-Azerbaijan Boundary Commission

2021/12/18 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Interview: Senior researcher on Central Asia and Caucasus affairs, saying that approvals of the Armenia-Azerbaijan Boundary Commission should not be a prelude to changing the geographical borders in the region, noted: Iran can assist the peace talks in Karabakh so that by stabilizing borders and establishing calm measures can be taken for the future development of the region.

Speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Dr. Vali Kaleji said that what happened during the trilateral meeting of the presidents of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia in Sochi was an agreement to establish a joint border commission to determine the borders between Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan, adding: After the Second Karabakh War, the Zangilan, Kalbajar and Lachin regions returned to the rule of the Republic of Azerbaijan, and the withdrawal of the buffer zone caused the two countries to become neighbors in that region.

He added: In the past year, there have been several border tensions between the two countries, which led to the formation of a joint border commission. Of course, the meeting and the announcement of the formation of the commission was supposed to take place exactly on the anniversary of the signing of the Karabakh ceasefire agreement, i.e. November 10, but it seems that due to the serious sensitivities in Armenia, the agreement is a reminder of political and military failure of that country, Mr. Pashinyan decided to hold the meeting with a time interval.

Solving border problems takes more time

Recalling that the commission is set to resolve the dispute by the end of the year, the analyst of Central Asia and Caucasus affairs said: It is hard to believe that the dispute will be resolved within a month; what is unresolved in a year, how is it possible to be solved in a month? Therefore, it seems that solving those issues will take more time.

Kaleji continued: Mr. Putin’s remarks after the Sochi summit were more important than its statement. He said the differences were inherited from the Soviet era, implying that there was no clear demarcation from the Soviet era and that this issue should be addressed in the new era. Although he used the word “communication corridors”, he did not use the word “Zangezur”.

He added: Although Mr. Pashinyan had emphasized that the issue of the corridor would not be discussed at the Sochi meeting, it seems that there have been some talks about it and Mr. Putin used the word “communication corridors” to avoid causing sensitivity, especially inside Armenia. But eventually those communication corridors will be established between the Republic of Azerbaijan and Nakhchivan; but not under the term Zangezur.

The expert on Central Asia and the Caucasus affairs explained: The Armenian government is trying to determine the size of the corridor and will talk with the parties from what points it will pass, its ownership, the process of its control and security, whether being domestic or international, military or civilian, and rail or road. In particular, another meeting at the level of deputy prime minister is likely to be held in Moscow to discuss the details of the formation of a joint border commission.

Saying that if the two sides can move forward the case in the form of dialogue instead of clashes and war, it is in the interest of all parties so that the region does not face with tensions and border disputes again, he added: The Republic of Azerbaijan and Armenia set demarcation in this important part of their border with a delay of 30 years compared to other Soviet republics.

Iran must be informed of agreements and approvals

Emphasizing that there is a minimum expectation that Iran will be informed of the agreements and approvals of the joint commission, he added: This expectation is Iran’s natural right; because what happened on the Goris-Kapan road showed that those border disputes could affect the Iranian transit route, or that if that corridor crosses adjacent to the Iranian border, it could be a threat to Iran-Armenia border.

The analyst of Central Asia and Caucasus affairs, saying that the Azeri, Russian and Turkish sides emphasis that the corridor is not a threat to the Iranian border, added: They should announce the decision in a transparent, formal and accurate manner. Iran’s knowledge of the resolutions and the negotiation process can build more trust in the region and reduce the severity of concerns about that route and the possible threat to Iran-Armenia border.

Kaleji stressed: In any case, this route should not be a threat to about 40 kilometers border of Iran; at the same time, approvals of the commission should not be a prelude to changing the geographical borders in the region. In fact, the geopolitical geography of the region should not change.

Need to increase ongoing regional consultations

Emphasizing the need to increase ongoing regional consultations in this regard and playing of a more active and dynamic role by the Iranian diplomacy, he said: Iran can assist the negotiation process in Karabakh talks, by stabilizing the border situation and establishing calm for future plans in the region, including implementation of Soviet railways in the Julfa region. It will definitely be in our interest to revive the transit route and the railways. Iran was the only country whose railway connection with the Caucasus was cut off during the First Karabakh War, and this connection has not existed for 30 years.

The expert on Central Asia and the Caucasus affairs, referring to Russia’s role in holding a joint border commission and talks between the Republic of Azerbaijan and Armenia, as well as Moscow-Tehran dispute over instances of geopolitical change in the region, added: Unfortunately, we do not yet know the details of the commission. If the commission is to resolve border disputes and implement Article 9 of the Karabakh ceasefire agreement and give the Republic of Azerbaijan access to Nakhchivan, there is no problem, but creating “Zangezur Corridor” on the basis of the request of the Republic of Azerbaijan, will be a cause of concern and unacceptability.

He added: The experience of the past three decades shows that removing Iran or ignoring it from regional agreements will not contribute to peace and stability in the region. We hope that this cooperation will be a basis for six-side cooperation in the Caucasus within the 3+3 framework.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading