The responsibility of the United Nations and the Security Council for the humanitarian catastrophe in Myanmar

2021/11/22 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An international law professor says what is transpiring in Myanmar is a humanitarian catastrophe, adding that the international community has a responsivity to shoulder and the veto power in the Security Council has prevented the council’s mechanism’s efficiency in connection with the genocide of the people of Myanmar by its government.

Omid Biparva told the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations that humanitarian situation in Myanmar is dire and can be described as a “disaster”.

“According to the evidence, an ethnic group is on the verge of extinction under Article 1 of the Convention against Genocide”, he said, referring to the remarks of the director of the independent investigation mechanism for Myanmar of the United Nations concerning the collection of evidence of genocide since the army took power and started extensive and systematic attacks against civilizations that are considered as crime against humanity.

He described the procedures of the International Criminal Court (ICC) as “conservative and hard” when it comes to branding “genocide”, saying that the situation of the Rohingya ethnic group as well as the violence in Myanmar are very dangerous. Despite a UN agreement with Myanmar that would allow hundreds of thousands of displaced Rohingya in Bangladesh to return to their homeland by choice, the continued massive influx of migrants to Bangladesh and other countries reflects the fragile state which threatens this ethnic group.

This expert of the Human Rights Council of the Judiciary referred to the anti-human-rights measures and crimes committed against Muslim Rohingya and escalated tension and violence in Myanmar by the military which have resulted in the killing of some protestors.

“These actions are criminal under international criminal law, but are controversial in terms of investigating “genocide” or “crimes against humanity.” However, due to its appearance and its conformity with the definition of genocide in the “Convention against Genocide”, it can be referred to as genocide”.

Biparva added that “in any case, what is happening in Myanmar is a humanitarian catastrophe in which an ethnic and religious group is on the verge of extinction and action is being taken against them systematically and continuously, and the whole region has been affected by these actions in violation of international criminal law.”.

Asked about the responsibility of the United Nations and the Security Council regarding crimes in Myanmar, he said “the Myanmar military has reportedly used a variety of tactics, including burning villages and residential areas, looting property, mass arrests, torture, executions of prisoners and sexual violence against civilians, and is conducting clean-up operations in China State and several other states”.

He added that the Human Rights Watch, in a statement issued by the 521 National and International Organization, called on the UN Security Council to pass a resolution opposing the actions of the Myanmar army in China State, which borders India.

Biprova referred to the military coup in Myanmar and the military domination of the country and the suppression of anti-coup demonstrations, and commented on the UN Security Council’s passive response to the violence.

“On October 24, 2018, the UN Security Council voted in favor of France and Britain and the United States and condemned the Myanmar government for genocide of Rohingya Muslims, and this issue is also in the preliminary evaluation stage at the International Criminal Court.

The destructive role of veto power by the members of the Security Council

He added that however countries like China and Russia voted against this move in the Security Council, and now China and Russia, as the main veto-wielding members, are preventing the issue from being seriously pursued in the Security Council, and the UN has so far failed to take serious action and take a strategy in this respect.

According to the international law analyst, the mechanism that has made the UN Security Council ineffective by the Myanmar government in dealing with the genocide of Rohingya Muslims is the veto of members of the Security Council.

“According to some reports, more than 1,200 civilians have been killed and 37,000 displaced by security forces since the coup in Myanmar,” he said, adding that the military rule came to power in Myanmar through a coup which is considered contrary to the right of nations to self-determination and the Charter of the United Nations as per international law; Because using force to gain power is against the law. The UN special envoy for Myanmar also did not see the recognition of Myanmar’s military as a factor in helping to reduce violence.

Biparva said the coup government ignores the nation’s civil and political rights and the right to self-determination as a collective right; essentially establishing a military government is considered violating citizens’ right to political participation, and violating the right to self-determination in Myanmar. Accepting a government arising from coup is in evident violation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the self-determination right which is one of the fundamental principles of the international law.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading