Formation of Nuclear BRICS to Achieve Zero Carbon in Electricity Production

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: During a BRICS meeting in Moscow at the end of October, senior officials from the nuclear industry of member states signed a joint statement supporting establishing a BRICS nuclear platform. This move underscores the importance of peaceful nuclear energy in these nations' future energy strategies. From the Islamic Republic of Iran, a delegation from the Atomic Energy Organization, headed by IAEO Deputy and CEO of Iran’s Nuclear Energy Production and Development Holding Company, and active brokers participated in the proceedings. The participating members signed a statement supporting the formation of a nuclear platform (Nuclear BRICS).

Zahra Asghari – International Relations Researcher

BRICS members realize the priority of participating in sustainable energy supply, developing clean energy sources for electricity generation as part of a just global energy transition, and taking into account the commitments of BRICS member countries with the goal of achieving zero carbon in electricity generation and other industrial sectors within the framework of the domestic laws and regulations of each BRICS member country; they agreed to form this platform by emphasizing the fundamental role of peaceful nuclear technologies in ensuring equal and non-discriminatory access to energy and technological governance.

Given that the BRICS member states are leaders in nuclear commitments, taking into account their commitments to the nuclear non-proliferation regime, as mentioned in the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and especially in paragraph 1 of its Article 4, with the knowledge from the key role of companies based in BRICS countries in multiplying the capacity of nuclear power generation in the coming decades, they announced their intention to participate in this platform.

Based on the agreement in the meeting mentioned above, BRICS members are trying to create fair conditions for nuclear energy to be a central element in achieving clean energy supply and decarbonization goals. They also effectively contribute to a de-politicized and non-discriminatory partnership between developers and users of peaceful nuclear technologies. In addition, they will develop and implement best practices and advanced approaches for peaceful energy and non-nuclear energy technologies in BRICS and other markets.

Other goals of this group include exchanging experience, technology, and knowledge and promoting technical and engineering services to help countries that seek to improve their nuclear expertise. BRICS members should also explore different options and provide access to BRICS financial instruments to support nuclear energy projects. Members also support cooperation for implementing advanced reactor and nuclear fuel cycle projects and promote sustainable supply chains and technology development for the sustainable, safe, and reliable operation of nuclear power plants and research reactors.

Another goal of BRICS Nuclear is to share experiences in gaining public acceptance for nuclear energy projects and to effectively participate in research and marketing for BRICS member countries to apply them to non-energy applications, including in nuclear medicine, agriculture, plasma, quantum technologies, artificial intelligence, and other new technologies, and provide the basis for new partnerships for non-peaceful nuclear energy applications.

In the framework of this platform, public and private BRICS companies and other signatory institutions and organizations are encouraged to collaborate to align their initiatives with the global level of existing industries and international organizations. Also, the nuclear community will provide the background, common ideas, and proposals in the framework of international cooperation formats in a way that will shape the future trends of the nuclear industry.

Also, the BRICS government, public and private companies, and other signatory institutions and organizations request that other companies and institutions based in BRICS countries join this BRICS nuclear platform initiative.

It is worth noting that the agreements reached in the Moscow meeting mentioned above among the BRICS members are not legally binding and are not considered international agreements between the signatories or their respective countries.

It should be noted that the primary goal of nuclear BRICS is the development and implementation of the best practices and advanced approaches in terms of energy and non-energy applications of nuclear technologies for peaceful purposes in the BRICS and BRICS+ markets, as well as the development of incentive mechanisms and models and project implementation in the nuclear industry of member countries.

It is worth noting that by 2050, the BRICS countries will provide at least half of the world’s energy production and consumption, and nuclear energy will play an important role in meeting the growing demand for it.

0 Comments

LATEST CONTENT

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

North Korean Leader’s Plan to Strengthen His Position Against Trump

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: On the last day of October this year, North Korean media reported on the country’s new missile test. After firing, the new missile called the Hwasong-19, set a record for the longest range and highest altitude compared to other missiles in the country. This led the North Korean state news agency to introduce the missile as “the most powerful strategic missile in the world.”

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

North Korean Leader’s Plan to Strengthen His Position Against Trump

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: On the last day of October this year, North Korean media reported on the country’s new missile test. After firing, the new missile called the Hwasong-19, set a record for the longest range and highest altitude compared to other missiles in the country. This led the North Korean state news agency to introduce the missile as “the most powerful strategic missile in the world.”

Loading