Ukraine War; Challenges, Deepening Gaps in Intl. Cyberspace Governance

Strategic Council Online - Interview: An expert on international governance of cyberspace, stating that militarization of cyberspace causes a change in understanding from cooperation-oriented cyber geopolitics to conflict-oriented cyber geopolitics, said: Especially after Russia’s attack on Ukraine, the gaps in the discussion of international cyberspace governance have deepened.

Dr. Behzad Ahmadi Lafourki in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council of Foreign Relations, referring to Moscow’s threat that Western cyberattacks against Russia’s infrastructures could lead to a direct military confrontation, stated: The accusations of both sides against each other during this period have been high, but since May 20, that is when Putin warned in the meeting of the Russian Security Council that the infrastructures of foreign countries are being used against the country’s cyberspace and it seems that foreign armies are involved in this respect, the issue of militarization of cyberspace has become more prominent and raised to a higher level.
US preemptive cyberattacks in Ukraine
He said: After Putin’s speech, one of the commanders of the US cyber force in Estonia, which plays an important role in the NATO cyber security arrangements, along with Latvia, said that the US has carried out a range of defensive, offensive and intelligence cyber operations in support of Ukraine. Previously, this command had announced that it was conducting pre-emptive cyber operations in Ukraine.
Ahmadi continued: Those positions of the American side followed the warning of Krutskikh, Putin’s special representative in the field of international cyber security, and he announced that if those attacks continued, there would be a reciprocal response with conventional military action, and the responses may not be limited to cyber reaction. According to Krutskikh, the United States has ignored even its domestic laws in cyberattacks and has obviously lowered the threshold of military use of cyberspace. Although the words of Putin’s representative in showing the conventional military response to cyberattacks are considered as a fundamental development, in fact, here we are more witnessing a preliminary warning from the two sides of Russia and the United States not to raise the threshold of war from a cyber point of view.
He added: Therefore, it can be said that the warnings of both sides are more to create cyber deterrence and the evidence shows that this deterrence has been effective and the range of cyberattacks has not increased as expected. For this reason, except for a few attacks on European satellite companies put at the disposal of the Ukrainian military, the Russians did not expand their cyberattacks outside Ukraine, and no serious cyber actions against European or American companies have been reported.
Turning point of recognition of cyber power of Russians
Ahmadi considered the meeting between Biden and Putin in Geneva last year as a turning point for the Russians and explained: In that meeting, Biden gave the Russians a list of 16 critical American infrastructures and asked for an agreement not to attack them and the Russians were pleased with the recognition of their cyber power. A few months before that, Putin had proposed four points in the field of cyber security to the Americans, which was said to be a very comprehensive and extensive agreement for not attacking each other and to cooperate by opening communication channels and have common protocols.
The expert on international governance of the virtual space called those negotiations effective in controlling the scope of the cyber conflict in the Ukraine war and said: According to what we are witnessing, the cyber conflict can definitely become one of the types of wars in the near future; that is why we are witnessing the formation of cyber command and outer space command in many countries.
Geopoliticization of technology companies
Stating that cyber insecurity can deal a big blow on the economic interests of cyberspace, which has become of great importance to the international economy, Ahmadi noted: In the Ukraine war, technology became geopolitical to a great extent, and this was an important development in the field of ICT. In conflicts, technology companies often try to be neutral so that they can work with both sides of the conflict and benefit; but in that war, they were forced to choose a side, willingly or unwillingly; and of course, it helped to increase their weight, especially Google, Meta and Microsoft companies. Some of them, such as Starlink satellite internet, led by Elon Musk, even voluntarily got involved in that war, which will be instructive to study their behavior.
Emphasizing the role of decentralized technologies in the cyber conflict in the Ukraine war, the expert said: The importance of technologies that are available to individuals and do not require high expertise was shown in that war. At the same time, social networks as well as open source information, such as tracking movements through Google Maps and sharing them, also gained a new role and double importance.
Stabilization of cyber geopolitics, necessity of strengthening Iran’s presence, role in relevant Intl. forums
Ahmadi considered intensification of cyber conflict to the detriment of international economy, causing more serious issues related to the islandization of the Internet and added: Militarization of cyberspace causes a change in understanding from cooperation-oriented cyber geopolitics to conflict-oriented cyber geopolitics. In the Ukraine war, on the one hand, we are witnessing the uncontrolled and irresponsible distribution of cyber weapons and encouraging their use, and on the other hand, intensification of information campaigns to win the war of narratives; in fact, there is a kind of cyber spread on a large scale, which can fuel spread of cybercrimes and attacks in the whole world.
The expert on international governance of virtual cyberspace, referring to the formation of the understanding of the strategic threat of cyberspace from a military point of view in many countries after the war in Ukraine, said: In such an environment, the task of international law that can help reduce conflicts is not clear, and measures in this field in the form of GGE and OEWG have not yet come to fruition, and especially after Russia’s attack on Ukraine, the gaps in the international governance of cyberspace discussion has deepened.
According to Ahmadi, in such an atmosphere, in addition to taking the necessary measures in the field of cyber security and increasing resilience, it is necessary for the country to have a prominent presence in international forums related to the governance of virtual cyberspace and play an effective role in the evolving process of norms, rules and rights shaping such an atmosphere.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading