Interview with deputy of Iran Cyber Defense Command (1) Increased Risk of Cyber Threats in Strategic Competition of States

Strategic Council Online - The deputy of Iran Cyber Defense Command, stating that technological progress, in addition to having different advantages, also creates new problems, said: The United States, the Zionist regime, and their regional allies are working to increase their operational access to our infrastructures by taking advantage of the advancement in cyberspace-related technologies.

Mohammad Reza Farajipour, speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, referred to the volume of cyber-threat attacks to countries and noted: We are living in a period of strategic competition in this area. Our country also faces many challenges from the enemies. Using their capabilities and capacities, they try to limit our movements, especially in the Axis of Resistance, and prevent the Islamic Republic of Iran from gaining access to superior power and strategic advantages in the region.

He added: Governmental and non-governmental actants are not only developing such capabilities, but sometimes they operate them at the regional level and against some countries, including our own country. Those capabilities cover all areas of battle and cross the borders of countries in cyberspace.

The deputy of Iran Cyber Defense Command cited intrusion into data networks, maximum domination of social networks and their complete control, information manipulation, cyber-attacks and economic sanctions, among other measures and continued:  Of course, in appearance, those actions are lower than the traditional threshold of war, and often have an acceptable denial, enabling actants to carry out offensive actions without the possibility of attribution and with maximum anonymity.

However he stressed must be borne in mind that emerging advances in the areas of materials, high-performance computing power, robotics, artificial intelligence and biotechnology, increase military and technology capabilities of the enemy, and create other challenges.

US, Zionist regime attempting to gain access to Iran’s infrastructures

Farajipour said: The United States, the Zionist regime and their regional allies are trying to increase their operational access to our infrastructures by taking advantage of the opportunities provided by advancements in cyberspace-related technologies. They are even using the situation created by the COVID-19 epidemic to advance an information war aimed at weakening Iran and imposing economic and political conditions to their advantage.

Saying that their allies in the region are also seeking to expand their military capabilities and advance their regional goals, he noted: Those countries are working with the United States to take operational action against us, other countries and resistance groups. Terrorist threats are remaining, and maintaining a high level of vigilance to protect national interests is an inevitable necessity.

Referring to the importance of cyber offensives and defensives for countries, Farajipour explained: Today, many countries are launching offensive cyber operations. They either launch cyber-attacks with a preemptive approach or launch offensive operations to retaliate against them. Although the impact of those cases may seem short-lived, it can lead to more insecurity and instability in cyberspace.

Importance of offensive cyber operations

According to the deputy Cyber Defense Command, in a situation where all kinds of cyber-attacks are carried out by some countries and groups under their secret support, offensive cyber operations can help deter and protect the basic assets of countries against illegal and security disrupting activities of others.

Noting that the proactive cyber defense means taking action to counter cyber-attacks through cyber and cognitive domains, he said: This type of defense represents the layer between defensive and offensive actions. In that layer, there are measures such as deterring the attacker, disrupting his activities or preventing start of the attack, or preventing the threatening preparedness for attack, either preventively or in self-defense. Common methods include cyber deception, assignment, threat hunting, and pursuit of the attacker.

Emphasizing that cyber-attacks can be planned to repel an attack (active defense) or support operational measures, Farajipour added: Active proactive cyber defense is different from active defense in terms of predictive defense, in which case the actant does not wait for the attack to occur. The difference between active cyber defense and offensive cyber operations (OCO) is that in offensive state, special legal permissions or executive powers are required. Thus, although offensive cyber capabilities may be developed with the collaboration of industry or facilitated by the private sector, the principle of operation is often carried out by governments. Of course, there are some exceptions, especially in cases of self-defense or with judicial authority or assistance to the enforcement of law.

He continued: The idea that cyberspace is a good place for the offensive has become very widespread among policymakers and analysts, many of whom use this assumption as an argument to prioritize offensive cyber operations. Of course, the belief in the preference of offense in cyberspace is understandable for several reasons, including violation of information systems security has become a common practice; from day-to-day identity theft to well-publicized hacks.

Disadvantages of focusing on offense

Meanwhile, Farajipour added: Focusing on the offensive, increases international tensions and countries’ readiness to launch a counterattack after a cyber-attack, and this often increases cyber vulnerabilities. Belief in cyber-attack preference is not based on a clear idea or empirical measurement of the balance of defense and attack.

He attributed the useful idea of ​​cyber defense and offensive balance to cost-benefit analysis, and asked: Are the benefits of the offense less than the cost of the offense, and what is the ratio of defense costs to its benefits? The complexity of cyberspace technology leads to increased defense costs; but the costs of attack and defense are ultimately shaped by the complexity of the targets of the attack, the objectives of defense, and the ability of organizations to manage this complexity. Organizational skills can shift the cost of cyber operations to defense. In addition, while violating information systems is easy and can be done at a relatively low cost, achieving physical effects is much more difficult and costly.

Optimists and pessimists to cyberspace

Emphasizing that the most important necessity is to understand the real meaning of cyber threats, about which there are disagreements even among the scientific community, Farajipour stated: One view considers cyberspace as an opportunity and does not respond to its threats; this group is called the Optimist Group. Another group sees cyberspace as a threat and strongly advises others to avoid it; we call this group the Pessimists. It is interesting to note that even in the “cradle of the Internet”, that is the United States, there are these two types of attitudes.

The Deputy Cyber Defense Command, referring to popular schools of thought on the effect of the Internet on political changes said: On the one hand, there are those who believe that technology has certain characteristics that will promote democracy around the world, and on the other hand, there are those who believe that the Internet strengthens the authoritarian tools and political repression. Both views attribute a decisive role to the Internet, which is inconsistent with its neutral nature. In contrast, the effects of the Internet on political change depend on the context and ability of the actors who use it.

Saying that advances in technology not only bring various benefits to a number of people, but also cause serious problems, especially if the technology is not used properly, he added: For example, the development of the Internet and other technological innovations, such as the three giant search engines; Google, Yahoo and MSN have led people to a world where they can do extra work without sacrificing other daily tasks.

Farajipour addressed the positive effects of the Internet communications in the field of education and at the same time said: Improper use of this technological advancement can have devastating effects on education and community developments. Issues related to individual rights and intellectual property are some of the academic concerns that always appear in the world of education.

He added: Using the Internet to threaten communities or commit cybercrimes, including stealing people’s information and illegally hacking their financial resources in any way, is considered a serious crime that should be stopped, and for this purpose, it is insisted that people should only use this technology non-criminally.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Redefining Diplomacy in the Digital Age

Strategic Council Online– Opinion: From the past to the present, there has been a close relationship between technology and international relations. From the introduction of the steam engine to the emergence of the telephone and radio, significant milestones were achieved that enabled faster and more direct communication, reducing the need for intermediaries and diplomatic bureaucracy. The development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) systems also have the potential to transform various aspects of human life, much like climate change did decades ago in the international system. The reason AI impacts the international system, particularly in diplomacy, is that politics and political issues are among the most complex human behaviors, and this complexity reaches its peak in the international arena.

Iran’s Role in the New World Order

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs analyst stated that the contemporary world is transitioning toward a multipolar order in which major powers such as the United States, China, and Russia are engaged in a complex competition to preserve or expand their global influence. In this context, Iran, as a key player in the region and the Islamic world with significant strategic capabilities—including membership in BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)—can leverage these developments to strengthen its position.

An Analysis of South Korea’s Response to Trump’s Tariff Policy

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, a new wave of economic protectionism in the form of tariff policies has impacted global trade. One of the first countries targeted by these tariffs was South Korea—a nation whose economy heavily relies on exports, particularly to the American market.

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Redefining Diplomacy in the Digital Age

Strategic Council Online– Opinion: From the past to the present, there has been a close relationship between technology and international relations. From the introduction of the steam engine to the emergence of the telephone and radio, significant milestones were achieved that enabled faster and more direct communication, reducing the need for intermediaries and diplomatic bureaucracy. The development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) systems also have the potential to transform various aspects of human life, much like climate change did decades ago in the international system. The reason AI impacts the international system, particularly in diplomacy, is that politics and political issues are among the most complex human behaviors, and this complexity reaches its peak in the international arena.

Iran’s Role in the New World Order

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs analyst stated that the contemporary world is transitioning toward a multipolar order in which major powers such as the United States, China, and Russia are engaged in a complex competition to preserve or expand their global influence. In this context, Iran, as a key player in the region and the Islamic world with significant strategic capabilities—including membership in BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)—can leverage these developments to strengthen its position.

An Analysis of South Korea’s Response to Trump’s Tariff Policy

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, a new wave of economic protectionism in the form of tariff policies has impacted global trade. One of the first countries targeted by these tariffs was South Korea—a nation whose economy heavily relies on exports, particularly to the American market.

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Loading
Samir Design Group گروه طراحی سمیر