US Stance on Military Tension between Iran & Zionist Regime

2024/11/02 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Interview: An international affairs expert said: When the Israeli regime crosses all red lines under the pretext of defending its existence, Iran too will have no red line in defending its vital interests.

In an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Reza Nasri commented on the implications of the US interventions in the wars waged on Gaza and Lebanon by the Zionist regime and said: Politically, it should be noted that today, the US is involved in the presidential elections and is practically in a “stateless” situation. Because of this, the influence of Netanyahu and the Israeli lobby in Washington has increased, and they are actually leading America in their desired direction. This situation will continue at least until the fate of the election is decided.

Concerning Biden’s statement before the Israeli regime attacked Iran that he had been informed about details of the attack, the expert said: Apart from what positions are taken in the official statements, the release of secret documents about the Israeli regime’s attack on Iran shows that within the American ruling establishment, there is willpower to prevent the spread of the war to Iran and the region through unofficial means, at least until the end of the US elections.

Nasri was asked: Given the US military, political, and financial support to the Israeli regime, can Iran target US positions and interests in the region? He replied:  In the “reaction determination” process to America, only legal criteria should not be considered. In general, arming a regime that is committing genocide is against the principles and standards of international law and the international obligations of the United States. There is no justification for equipping this regime to attack Iran, which has only used its legitimate right to defend itself against the Israeli regime. However, deciding whether to respond militarily or to target US positions in the region is not simply a legal decision and requires consideration of all aspects.

Nasri continued: Iran is not seeking to escalate tension in the region, but naturally if it feels that its vital interests are threatened, it will react accordingly. When the Israeli regime crosses all the red lines under the pretext of defending its existence, Iran will not have a red line to defend its vital interests.

This international affairs expert talked about the impact of the US intervention in the Israeli regime’s war in Gaza and the region on the US elections and the damage that is done to the election process and election campaigns, especially for the Democrats; said: Trump during his presidency took very controversial steps to support the Israeli regime. He did things no American president had done before.  What none of the previous US presidents had done. He moved the American embassy to Baitul Moqaddas (Jerusalem), recognized the Golan Heights as part of occupied Palestine, withdrew from the nuclear agreement with Iran known as the Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), and imposed the Abraham Pact on the Arab countries. The officials of the Israeli regime believe that with Trump’s return to power, they can implement their plans for the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, push the United States towards a direct military confrontation with Iran – especially to target the country’s nuclear facilities – and organize the new order of the region around the “Abraham Pacts.” For this reason, they support Trump’s victory in the upcoming elections.

He added: But on the other hand, they are also aware of the fact that if they cause the defeat of the Democrats in this election, they have practically strained their relations with half of the American government in the long run. Also, if Kamala Harris wins the race despite their efforts to make Trump win, they will likely have a very strained relationship with his administration as well. For this reason, they are left in doubt whether they should take a gamble that will lead to Trump’s victory or adjust their actions so that it will not be interpreted as direct interference in the American elections.

This expert on international affairs said about Anthony Blinken’s trip to the region two weeks before the election: it seems that Blinken’s trip to the region was done to establish a ceasefire and release Israeli prisoners to strengthen the position of Kamala Harris in the American elections. On the other hand, it has been done to negotiate the possibility of a military conflict between Iran and the Israeli regime and to make the necessary preparations to face it. In any case, the conflict between Iran and the Israeli regime will have profound effects on regional stability, energy security, shipping, and the oil market, and the US government considers it necessary to discuss all matters with the interested countries.

0 Comments

LATEST CONTENT

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

North Korean Leader’s Plan to Strengthen His Position Against Trump

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: On the last day of October this year, North Korean media reported on the country’s new missile test. After firing, the new missile called the Hwasong-19, set a record for the longest range and highest altitude compared to other missiles in the country. This led the North Korean state news agency to introduce the missile as “the most powerful strategic missile in the world.”

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

North Korean Leader’s Plan to Strengthen His Position Against Trump

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: On the last day of October this year, North Korean media reported on the country’s new missile test. After firing, the new missile called the Hwasong-19, set a record for the longest range and highest altitude compared to other missiles in the country. This led the North Korean state news agency to introduce the missile as “the most powerful strategic missile in the world.”

Loading