An Analysis of Japan’s Military Doctrine

2024/09/08 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Interview: Iran’s former ambassador in Japan said: The trend of increasing Japan's military budget is such that it is expected to rank third in the growth of the world's military budget by 2027, but this does not mean this country is in state of war and extreme military situation.

Morteza Rahmani Mowahed, in an interview with the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations website, stated that Japan’s military policies are moving towards increasing the budget and allocating a larger share of the military budget to the country’s GDP. For this issue to have a political and domestic justification, it warns about the threat of neighboring countries such as China and North Korea so that they can justify this increase in the budget. The expert stated: Generally, the policy of countries that are economy-oriented and their growth and development process is solid and stable, it is not easy to choose the option of war and instability, but they often seek to justify the purchase of military weapons and increase their military budget by proposing some positions, therefore, adopting this policy by Japan does not mean this country will move towards war and conflict in the region.

The former Iran diplomat in Japan stated: Until two years ago, the Japanese government’s goal was not to spend more than 1% of the GDP annually on the defense budget. However, according to the three national security documents that the Kishida government fundamentally revised in late 2022, the Japanese government was obliged to raise defense-related spending to 2 percent of GDP by fiscal year 2027. These three documents are the National Security Strategy, the National Defense Program Guidelines, and the Medium-Term Defense Plan of Japan’s defense budget for fiscal year 2024, which has increased to 1.6 percent of GDP and is gradually approaching the 2 percent threshold in line with Western economies.

Rahmani Mowahed continued: According to the Japanese Ministry of Defense, military spending will reach 8.9 trillion yen ($56.7 billion) in the 12 months ending in March 2025. According to reports, the Ministry of Defense budget accounts for ¥7.7 trillion of these costs. The Japan Coast Guard and United Nations peacekeeping operations fund another ¥1.2 trillion.

This expert on East Asian issues stated: Two factors are effective in increasing Japan’s military budget. First, the Japanese government insists and emphasizes that the security environment of East Asia has become extremely tense and serious in the face of China’s military expansionism, the development of North Korea’s nuclear and missile program, and the Taiwan conflict. Second, Japan’s military budget has been ranked low compared to other G7 members in terms of GDP.

Iran’s former ambassador to Japan stated that Germany was once cautious about increasing its military spending, but in February, it announced that it would reach NATO’s 2% target. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, global military expenditure in 2023 will get a historic record of $2.44 trillion, with an increase of 6.8 percent. Japan, affected by the weak yen, also fell one place in the global rankings to 10th place. But its defense budget has grown the fastest in more than 50 years. Of course, it should be noted that the late Prime Minister Abe’s government, in a way, caused the turning of Japan’s general policy in the military field.

He said: After the defeat in the Second World War, the Japanese acted according to Yoshida’s doctrine, which means “weak army, strong country,” and quickly followed the path of industrialization, but Mr. Abe put an end to this doctrine by approving the security bills and the doctrine of “a strong army, a powerful country” that the subsequent governments, including the Suga government and the Kishida government, have taken steps to strengthen this doctrine.

0 Comments

LATEST CONTENT

An Analysis of Macron’s Stance on Stopping Delivery of Weapons to the Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said Macron’s recent stance on stopping the shipment of arms from France to the Zionist regime, which was slightly adjusted immediately due to the fear of pressure from the Zionist lobby, is aimed at internal exploitation for Emmanuel Macron and balancing the positions of the French government between the Jews and Muslims inside this country as well as Christians in Lebanon.

Messages and Strategic Implications of the Operation True Promise-2

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Operation True Promise-2, whose targets included the safest places of the Zionist regime, caused a lot of damage, while the number of ballistic missiles fired, which is the largest number in one day in history, is unprecedented in the lifetime of the Zionist regime.

Russia’s Nuclear Doctrine on the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that Russia’s threat to use nuclear weapons in the Ukraine war comes with a “deterrence” approach because the Russians currently have no ground for using nuclear weapons.

Zionist Regime’s Use of Artificial Intelligence in Gaza War and Its Consequences

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although artificial intelligence has important capabilities to improve and increase the level of efficiency and productivity in various human fields, including medicine, rapid diagnosis of diseases, progress in the field of treatment, industries, transportation, and education, it is an effective auxiliary tool to reduce damages. Natural disasters, etc., can bring outstanding achievements to human society. Still, this technology, which is a great blessing, has been used by the Zionist regime, especially in the Gaza war, to “advance non-conventional goals.”

Netanyahu’s Goals of Escalating Tensions with Lebanon’s Hezbollah

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An international affairs expert said: The situation of Netanyahu and the Likud Party has improved somewhat compared to the early months of the October 7 war, and it can be assumed that Netanyahu’s actions in Gaza, Lebanon, and the West Bank will not end soon, so much so that he will not allow a ceasefire to take place.

“New Order” According to the Zionist Regime?!

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime has announced that the codename of the assassination operation of Martyr Seyed Hassan Nasrallah was “New Order.” What might this designation mean, and why should the international community be concerned about it?

Implications of UN Passing Resolution against the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: Recently, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution supported by the majority of its members, calling for the end of the occupation of Palestinian territories within the next twelve months. This resolution was approved with 124 votes in favor, 14 against, and 43 other countries abstaining. In this resolution, the Israeli regime is asked to pay compensation for the damage and suffering inflicted on the Palestinian people during the occupation.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

An Analysis of Macron’s Stance on Stopping Delivery of Weapons to the Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said Macron’s recent stance on stopping the shipment of arms from France to the Zionist regime, which was slightly adjusted immediately due to the fear of pressure from the Zionist lobby, is aimed at internal exploitation for Emmanuel Macron and balancing the positions of the French government between the Jews and Muslims inside this country as well as Christians in Lebanon.

Messages and Strategic Implications of the Operation True Promise-2

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Operation True Promise-2, whose targets included the safest places of the Zionist regime, caused a lot of damage, while the number of ballistic missiles fired, which is the largest number in one day in history, is unprecedented in the lifetime of the Zionist regime.

Russia’s Nuclear Doctrine on the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that Russia’s threat to use nuclear weapons in the Ukraine war comes with a “deterrence” approach because the Russians currently have no ground for using nuclear weapons.

Zionist Regime’s Use of Artificial Intelligence in Gaza War and Its Consequences

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although artificial intelligence has important capabilities to improve and increase the level of efficiency and productivity in various human fields, including medicine, rapid diagnosis of diseases, progress in the field of treatment, industries, transportation, and education, it is an effective auxiliary tool to reduce damages. Natural disasters, etc., can bring outstanding achievements to human society. Still, this technology, which is a great blessing, has been used by the Zionist regime, especially in the Gaza war, to “advance non-conventional goals.”

Netanyahu’s Goals of Escalating Tensions with Lebanon’s Hezbollah

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An international affairs expert said: The situation of Netanyahu and the Likud Party has improved somewhat compared to the early months of the October 7 war, and it can be assumed that Netanyahu’s actions in Gaza, Lebanon, and the West Bank will not end soon, so much so that he will not allow a ceasefire to take place.

“New Order” According to the Zionist Regime?!

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime has announced that the codename of the assassination operation of Martyr Seyed Hassan Nasrallah was “New Order.” What might this designation mean, and why should the international community be concerned about it?

Implications of UN Passing Resolution against the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: Recently, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution supported by the majority of its members, calling for the end of the occupation of Palestinian territories within the next twelve months. This resolution was approved with 124 votes in favor, 14 against, and 43 other countries abstaining. In this resolution, the Israeli regime is asked to pay compensation for the damage and suffering inflicted on the Palestinian people during the occupation.

Loading