An Analysis of Sudan’s Civil War and the Role of Foreign Interventions

2024/08/27 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: This is the second time that efforts have been made to establish peace in Sudan, but so far, no positive perspective and no clear vision has been drawn for the end of the conflict in this country.

Jafar Ghanadbashi – expert on African issues

Sudan’s peace negotiations are not between a foreign country and Sudan but between two groups of Sudanese soldiers who were together and under Omar al-Bashir’s command during his presidency.

The conflicting parties in Sudan, one of which is the military commander of the army under the title of head of the Sudanese Sovereignty Council (Abd al-Fattah al-Barhan), and the other is the commander of the Rapid Support or Rapid Response forces (Mohammed Hamedan Deglu), are fighting not over the capture of a specific region or province in this country. Rather, they are fighting each other over taking over the central government’s power and being in charge of all Sudanese affairs.

 

The war has caused the displacement of 7.5 million people of Sudan in the past year and a half and the migration of one and a half million people outside of this country. According to the available statistics, this war has so far killed more than 13 thousand and injured tens of thousands of people.

Sudan’s civil war is a war that has not happened in any third-world country in the past half-century. In a situation where the parties do not have the public support of the international parties like during the Cold War, it has caused the most damage to this country’s economic infrastructure and created the biggest social crisis.

The expansion of the 16-month war and its continuation has caused the concern of many neighboring countries of Sudan and even extra-regional powers. Many regional, international, and neighboring governments of Sudan have tried to provide grounds for negotiations between the parties and the non-spreading of internal unrest in Sudan to other parts of the region.

The main concern of the great powers and Sudan’s neighbors is that during this war, extremist groups will take advantage of the unrest among the Sudanese people and carry out destabilizing actions in the entire areas of Sudan, especially the coasts of the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean, which will pose risks to the waterways.

In this situation, the representatives of the Sudanese army, who are currently in control of the capital, openly talk about the UAE’s intervention and role in the expansion of this war, and they believe that the UAE is trying to attack some oil resources and precious metal deposits in Sudan. To take over the central government of Sudan with the support of the Rapid Support Force headed by Mohammad Hamdan Deglu.

The representative of the President of Sudan’s Governing Council in the United Nations spoke about the need to prevent the UAE’s actions in Sudan and considered any negotiations for a ceasefire and internal peace in Sudan dependent on the end of the UAE’s intervention in Sudan.

However, the important point is the lack of role-playing by Sudan’s political parties and religious and political institutions to prevent this civil war. Parties and groups that have had very long and sometimes positive records in the political arena of Sudan have provided the grounds for establishing democracy and peace in this country for several consecutive periods.

Therefore, this lack of activity of Sudanese parties and groups has caused the fate of Sudan’s affairs to be in the hands of two war-seeking and power-thirsty groups who relentlessly and, regardless of the losses that have set Sudan back for many years, continue with civil wars.

Currently, half of Sudan’s hospitals and clinics have become strongholds for the conflicts of the parties. Such a process, considering the destruction of Sudan’s economic infrastructure, the inactivity of political groups and parties in this country, as well as some suspicious and covert actions of some regional and extra-regional powers, has put Sudan on a path where the hope of restoring normal conditions has been minimized and the hope for re-establishment of a strong civilian government in Sudan has also been significantly reduced.

The important point is that the unrest in Sudan started precisely when the military was transferring power to the civilians. Still, some of their leaders tried to establish the grounds for the continuation of the military rule through relations with the Zionist regime.

According to some analysts, the hands of the Zionist regime can be seen behind the scenes of this destructive war, which is trying to prevent Sudan from becoming one of the links of the resistance front.

0 Comments

LATEST CONTENT

An Analysis of Macron’s Stance on Stopping Delivery of Weapons to the Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said Macron’s recent stance on stopping the shipment of arms from France to the Zionist regime, which was slightly adjusted immediately due to the fear of pressure from the Zionist lobby, is aimed at internal exploitation for Emmanuel Macron and balancing the positions of the French government between the Jews and Muslims inside this country as well as Christians in Lebanon.

Messages and Strategic Implications of the Operation True Promise-2

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Operation True Promise-2, whose targets included the safest places of the Zionist regime, caused a lot of damage, while the number of ballistic missiles fired, which is the largest number in one day in history, is unprecedented in the lifetime of the Zionist regime.

Russia’s Nuclear Doctrine on the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that Russia’s threat to use nuclear weapons in the Ukraine war comes with a “deterrence” approach because the Russians currently have no ground for using nuclear weapons.

Zionist Regime’s Use of Artificial Intelligence in Gaza War and Its Consequences

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although artificial intelligence has important capabilities to improve and increase the level of efficiency and productivity in various human fields, including medicine, rapid diagnosis of diseases, progress in the field of treatment, industries, transportation, and education, it is an effective auxiliary tool to reduce damages. Natural disasters, etc., can bring outstanding achievements to human society. Still, this technology, which is a great blessing, has been used by the Zionist regime, especially in the Gaza war, to “advance non-conventional goals.”

Netanyahu’s Goals of Escalating Tensions with Lebanon’s Hezbollah

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An international affairs expert said: The situation of Netanyahu and the Likud Party has improved somewhat compared to the early months of the October 7 war, and it can be assumed that Netanyahu’s actions in Gaza, Lebanon, and the West Bank will not end soon, so much so that he will not allow a ceasefire to take place.

“New Order” According to the Zionist Regime?!

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime has announced that the codename of the assassination operation of Martyr Seyed Hassan Nasrallah was “New Order.” What might this designation mean, and why should the international community be concerned about it?

Implications of UN Passing Resolution against the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: Recently, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution supported by the majority of its members, calling for the end of the occupation of Palestinian territories within the next twelve months. This resolution was approved with 124 votes in favor, 14 against, and 43 other countries abstaining. In this resolution, the Israeli regime is asked to pay compensation for the damage and suffering inflicted on the Palestinian people during the occupation.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

An Analysis of Macron’s Stance on Stopping Delivery of Weapons to the Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said Macron’s recent stance on stopping the shipment of arms from France to the Zionist regime, which was slightly adjusted immediately due to the fear of pressure from the Zionist lobby, is aimed at internal exploitation for Emmanuel Macron and balancing the positions of the French government between the Jews and Muslims inside this country as well as Christians in Lebanon.

Messages and Strategic Implications of the Operation True Promise-2

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Operation True Promise-2, whose targets included the safest places of the Zionist regime, caused a lot of damage, while the number of ballistic missiles fired, which is the largest number in one day in history, is unprecedented in the lifetime of the Zionist regime.

Russia’s Nuclear Doctrine on the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that Russia’s threat to use nuclear weapons in the Ukraine war comes with a “deterrence” approach because the Russians currently have no ground for using nuclear weapons.

Zionist Regime’s Use of Artificial Intelligence in Gaza War and Its Consequences

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although artificial intelligence has important capabilities to improve and increase the level of efficiency and productivity in various human fields, including medicine, rapid diagnosis of diseases, progress in the field of treatment, industries, transportation, and education, it is an effective auxiliary tool to reduce damages. Natural disasters, etc., can bring outstanding achievements to human society. Still, this technology, which is a great blessing, has been used by the Zionist regime, especially in the Gaza war, to “advance non-conventional goals.”

Netanyahu’s Goals of Escalating Tensions with Lebanon’s Hezbollah

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An international affairs expert said: The situation of Netanyahu and the Likud Party has improved somewhat compared to the early months of the October 7 war, and it can be assumed that Netanyahu’s actions in Gaza, Lebanon, and the West Bank will not end soon, so much so that he will not allow a ceasefire to take place.

“New Order” According to the Zionist Regime?!

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime has announced that the codename of the assassination operation of Martyr Seyed Hassan Nasrallah was “New Order.” What might this designation mean, and why should the international community be concerned about it?

Implications of UN Passing Resolution against the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: Recently, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution supported by the majority of its members, calling for the end of the occupation of Palestinian territories within the next twelve months. This resolution was approved with 124 votes in favor, 14 against, and 43 other countries abstaining. In this resolution, the Israeli regime is asked to pay compensation for the damage and suffering inflicted on the Palestinian people during the occupation.

Loading