Strategic Importance of Strengthening Iran-Turkey Relations

2023/06/10 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Guest opinion: In the West Asian region, the number of countries that have democratic systems and real and free elections may not even reach the number of the fingers of one hand, and when those elections are related to an active and proactive country in the region, such as Turkey, its importance and analytical value multiplies. Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri - University professor

On May 28, 2023, Turkish leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan won the second round of the Turkish presidential elections against his rival, Kemal Kilicdaroglu. Erdogan has been in power since 2003, first as the prime minister and then as the president of Turkey since 2014.

His latest victory in the recent elections also gives him the possibility of another five-year term for the presidency. This victory and the results of the parliamentary elections on May 14, which caused the pro-Erdogan parties to gain an acceptable majority in the legislative assembly of that country, have given Erdogan a particular position, and the consequences of this influential position will not be limited only within the borders of Turkey.

Since the Turkish presidential elections did not change the power factors among the country’s political elites and led to Erdogan’s re-victory, it can be said that in the next five years, we will see the continuation of Turkey’s foreign policy in the West Asian region.

Of course, this claim has a serious if and but, influenced by “Erdogan’s pragmatic and flexible political personality,” which caused key and serious developments in Turkey’s foreign policy under his leadership at certain times. Whenever Erdogan realizes that his policies are wrong, costly, or have little impact on Turkey’s national interests, without the reservations and stubbornness that many politicians in the region have, he does not shy away from 180-degree changes in his government’s foreign policy and with a sudden turn he changes and corrects the direction of his country towards the desired goals; however, like many West Asian politicians, he does not believe in explaining such changes or a possible apology for past mistakes.

But in general, Erdogan is expected to continue his previous policies in the West Asian region in the next five years. Therefore, the Islamic Republic of Iran will continue to face Turkey’s same policies and approaches.

Such policies include trying to strengthen Turkey’s influence in the region, supporting Turkey-related groups in Syria, Libya, and the Caucasus, continuing to play a role in the Karabakh crisis and relations between the Republic of Azerbaijan and Armenia, exploiting the Ukraine crisis to regulate Turkey’s relationship with Russia and The European Union as well as trying to improve relations with the Israeli regime.

Of course, in addition to the policies mentioned above, maintaining relations with Iran is also very important for the Turkish government, and this issue can open the door to many knots and problems.

In international and regional relations, although consultation and dialogue is the solution to many competitions, conflicts, and crises, as long as such dialogues do not lead to concrete benefits and privileges for the parties, they usually do not end in significant and effective results.

Therefore, it seems that the way of successful interaction between Iran and Turkey under Erdogan’s leadership in the new era is to create advantages and mutual benefits that cannot be ignored in bilateral relations and show Iran’s power and capacity to reduce the problems of that country in the regional and international arena.

Turkey is currently facing many challenges in the field of its foreign policy; the following are some to mention:

  1. Relations with the West: Although Turkey is a member of NATO, its relations with the West have been tense due to issues such as human rights and democracy, as well as its approach to Greece and Cyprus, and the case may continue in the future.
  2. Turkey is worried about its position in Syria: Since Russia withdrew a large number of its forces from Syria due to the war in Ukraine, Turkey interprets this issue as an opportunity to increase Iran’s influence and presence in Syria and to maintain its position in that country and maybe, in its opinion, has tried to prevent the spread of Iran’s influence in that country to get closer to the Israeli regime.
  3. The Kurdistan issue: Turkey is against the movements of the Kurds and has targeted those movements in recent years with military attacks on Kurdish areas in Syria and Iraq.
  4. Economic problems: Turkey has been facing many economic challenges in recent years, including severe inflation and devaluation of its national currency, and it needs to cooperate with other countries to solve those challenges.
  5. Turkey’s relations with the influential countries of the Arab world, such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt, have become cold and tense due to the country’s regional policies and support for the Muslim Brotherhood and Erdogan, in continuation of his recent policies, seeks to restore and repair such relations.
  6. Immigration problem: Due to the crises in the region’s countries, including Syria and Afghanistan, Turkey is facing the entry of illegal immigrants into its country, and it needs to cooperate with other countries to manage this problem.

The cases mentioned above are part of the problems and concerns of Turkey’s foreign policy at the current stage and in the years to come. The Islamic Republic of Iran can solve Turkey’s concerns in many fields with active and innovative planning and policy-making and lead this important and influential country to cooperation and shared interests in the region. Collaboration and synergy in Syria, mutual efforts to circumvent and neutralize Western sanctions and pressures against the two countries, cooperation in the field of rational and effective confrontation with the Kurds in the region, and joint planning to deal with the crisis of illegal migrants are some of the areas in which Iran and Turkey have common interests and working on them can bring the approach of the two countries closer to each other and resolve the mutual concerns of the two sides.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

Loading