Middle East on the Threshold of Comprehensive Peace

2023/03/27 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: The strategic agreement between Iran and Saudi Arabia in Beijing will help transform the political and security conditions and move towards stable peace and stability in the region. This agreement will end the costly tensions between Tehran and Riyadh and create new political and security stability requirements and expand cooperation between the region’s countries. Hassan Hanizadeh - Expert on Middle East affairs

The countries of the region, including Turkey and the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council members, welcomed the Tehran-Riyadh agreement in Beijing and considered it a guarantee of maintaining the stability and security of the region.

The first side effects of the agreement are the turning away of the Arab countries of the Persian Gulf from the Zionist regime, just like when Saudi Arabia refused to give a visa to a high-ranking Israeli delegation. Also, the United Arab Emirates, which recently witnessed the visit of the Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council of the Islamic Republic of Iran to Abu Dhabi, canceled the contract to buy defense systems from the Zionist regime.

Syrian President Bashar Assad’s visit to Moscow and meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin also show that Syria is coming out of a 12-year-old crisis. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan also announced his desire to establish relations with Syria and solve his problems with Damascus on the eve of the country’s national elections. Turkey played an ultimately destructive role in the internal crisis of Syria. By strengthening the terrorist groups in that country, it occupied part of the Idlib Governorate in northwest Syria. The presence of 15,000 Turkish soldiers in a hundred bases in the northwestern regions of Syria showed that the Turkish government intends to divide an essential part of the Syrian territory. But the recent agreement between Iran and Saudi Arabia in Beijing will pave the way for sustainable peace in the region; because Iran and Saudi Arabia are the two influential countries in West Asia, and any tension between the two countries will hurt other countries.

Saudi Arabia’s cruel war against the people of Yemen, which has passed its seventh year, has cost Saudi Arabia more than 350 billion dollars; as such, some of the construction projects in Saudi Arabia have almost stopped during the past seven years. Since Mohammed bin Salman, the crown prince of Saudi Arabia, needs a safe political margin to advance his 2030 plan and reach power, he has sent positive signals for an agreement with Iran since last year. Since the month of Farvardin (March/April) last year, negotiations between Iranian and Saudi delegations began in Baghdad with the Iraqi government’s efforts. Five rounds of challenging and breathtaking talks were held on the security issues between the two countries’ delegations. The initial outcome of the negotiations was the establishment of a ceasefire between Riyadh and Sana’a. Because one of Iran’s conditions for achieving stable regional peace was the end of the war in Yemen. The negotiations were supposed to move from the security phase to the political stage. Still, the internal events in Iran last fall and the destructive role of the Saudi media in the recent events in Iran led to the halting of the negotiation process in Baghdad. But the recent visit of Chinese President Xi Jinping to Riyadh broke the deadlock between Iran and Saudi Arabia; during this visit, the president of China proposed to the Saudi side to mediate between that country and Iran, which the Saudis accepted. Also, during the visit of the president of the Islamic Republic of Iran to Beijing last February, the president of China presented the same proposal to his Iranian counterpart, which was accepted.

Negotiations between Ali Shamkhani, the Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, and Mosaed Bin Mohammad Al-Aiban, the Saudi National Security Adviser, were held in a closed atmosphere and away from the eyes of the media, the outcome of which was the recent agreement. Now the season of political harvest from this agreement has come because many Arab countries in the region, including the UAE, Bahrain, Jordan, and Egypt, will join the circle of the Iran-Saudi Arabia agreement in the future following Riyadh. In such a process and considering that Recep Tayyip Erdoğan needs an international political achievement on the eve of Turkey’s national elections for the victory of the Justice and Development Party, therefore, speculation is that the Turkish president will move towards peace with his neighbor Syria shortly. This stable peace has high economic and security benefits for China, which needs the fossil energy of Iran and Saudi Arabia and intends to remove the specter of the US from the region. Instead of continuing the tension and confrontation, the path of convergence and understanding is ahead for the region’s countries.

In general, it seems that the year 1402 should be called the year of peace, convergence, regional development, isolation of the Zionist regime, and the beginning of a constructive interaction to ensure the common interests of the Muslim countries in the region.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading