Zionist Regime’s Strategy to Exercise Influence in Central Asia

2023/01/09 | interview, News, political

Strategic Council Online - Interview: A faculty member of Allameh Tabataba’i University said: The Islamic extremism raised by the Zionist regime in Central Asia and the Caucasus is an excuse aimed at suppressing Islamic movements in the region.

In an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Dr. Hamid Hakim referred to the visit of delegations from Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Turkmenistan to Tel Aviv regarding cooperation in the fight against terrorism, fundamentalism and drugs and stated: The Zionist regime has taken shape in an environment where it constantly feels being threatened, because it has problems in terms of acceptability and legitimacy. Even if it draws the surrounding governments with it, it cannot draw the support of the people of those countries, and so far this cooperation has not been extended from the people of the countries.

Explaining the approach of the “Ben-Gurion Doctrine” and the effort for peripheral unity with an emphasis on creating strategic depth, the analyst of international affairs added: At the regional level, countries also recognize the Zionist regime as an arm of the West. In fact, the Zionist regime is being faced with those challenges at the regional and trans-regional levels, and for this reason, it pursues increasing influence and presence in regions beyond the Middle East with an aim of increasing global legitimacy and consequently maintaining and surviving its existence.

Stating that the countries of Central Asia believe that development of relations with the Zionist regime leads to the development of relations with the West, Hakim continued: The Central Asian countries and the Caucasus always feel the shadow of Russia over their heads and are afraid of that country. In the upper Russian documents, those areas are also considered as ‘near abroad’ and the backyard. Therefore, those countries try to maintain interaction with the West as much as they can. In addition, considering the need for capital and technology, those countries think that the Zionist regime can meet those needs.

Referring to the importance of the economy and suitable market of Central Asia and the Caucasus, natural resources and the state of geopolitical, political and social factors of those countries for the Zionist regime, he said: Considering the role and influence of Iran and Russia in those regions with regard to their affinities and historical and civilizational similarities, the greater presence of the Zionist regime can have an impact on the presence of Iran and Russia and result in a zero-sum game. On the other hand, the Zionist regime considers those regions as a way to the East and bypassing the Middle East, which creates various interests for it.

The professor of Allameh Tabataba’i University, reminding that the countries of Central Asia are generally Muslim and in themselves have the potential to be on the front against the Zionist regime, added: The presence of the Zionist regime can prevent them from joining this front and create new ways for them to breathe and even put them in front of Iran.

He said: After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Zionist regime paid special attention to the regions of Central Asia and the Caucasus and has used every opportunity during the past three decades. The Zionist regime moves in non-allergenic, soft and creeping areas in those regions. In the areas where the population is Muslim and are located next to Iran, it does not go to the security and military areas first, and considering the needs of those countries, it focuses more on industrial, agricultural and economic issues during short-term implementation plans, which are aimed at meeting the objectives and interests of its long-term presence.

Emphasizing the difference between the Muslim context of the Central Asian countries and their governments, regarding the holding of anti-terrorism meeting in Tel Aviv and presence of those countries in it, Hakim continued: Such meetings had been held before, but for the people of those countries, such discussions are not acceptable. The Zionist regime is a regime that originated and is one of the founders and executors of state terrorism, and independent institutions and even institutions affiliated to the United Nations have repeatedly criticized and issued resolutions regarding this issue.

He called cooperation of the countries of Central Asia and the Caucasus with the Zionist regime in the field of fighting terrorism and narcotics as the only cooperation at government level and said: Islamic extremism that the Zionist regime raises is aimed at suppressing Islamic movements in the region.

The university professor, saying that cooperation of those countries with the Zionist regime can bring dangers for the governments of that region, emphasized: Considering the expansionist policies of the Zionist regime, presence of the regime undoubtedly has consequences for those countries; among other things, condemnation of such presence by the people of those countries and non-acceptance of cooperation will cause the separation of people and the government in the countries of this region. In addition, such presence causes the sensitivity of some countries in the region.

He continued: Iran should warn against those cases and have active diplomacy in those areas. The issue of paying attention to the neighbors, which has been addressed in the past year, is very valuable, and this trend should be continued, more active and energetic, and implemented by emphasizing economic, cultural and civilizational cooperation.

Hakim added: Iran should define short-term and long-term solutions to increase its presence in those areas through formulation of comprehensive cooperation documents and their follow-up, extraterritorial production and changes in trade tariffs.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading