Ukraine War an Opportunity for Azerbaijan to Exploit

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: Since the independence of the Republic of Azerbaijan, relations between Baku and Washington have been affected by various factors. Dr. Fatemeh Nekoolal Azad – Expert on international affairs

In general, the determining components of the US policy in relation to the South Caucasus, and including the Republic of Azerbaijan, encompass cases such as the safe transfer of energy to Europe, maintaining stability in the region (especially regarding Russia’s use of possible instability to intervene in the Caucasus and not endangering energy resources and energy transmission lines), terrorism, the Karabakh crisis, the role of the Armenian lobby in the United States, as well as the considerations of Turkey as a member of NATO and an ally of the United States.
In fact, influenced by regional and global conditions, at any point the role of one or more of the mentioned considerations in shaping the US policy has been highlighted.
For example, in the years after 9/11 the administration of George W. Bush announced the Republic of Azerbaijan ally in the fight against terrorism; therefore, Washington provided military aid to the Republic of Azerbaijan.
Also, in 2020, the relations between the United States and the Republic of Azerbaijan were subject to the consideration of the new Karabakh war. Recent developments in Washington-Baku relations show the fact that right now the energy factor is the most important factor shaping the US policy towards the Republic of Azerbaijan, in such a way that the US policy towards the Republic of Azerbaijan is changing.
During his 2020 campaign, which accidentally coincided with a new Karabakh war, Joe Biden announced that his would-be administration would contain Russia and Turkey. Biden’s critics believed that his administration’s silence on the Karabakh crisis is a bad blow to the credibility of the United States and Western values.
Despite the request of critics to emphasize the role of the US in the Karabakh crisis, the relations between the two countries, the United States and the Republic of Azerbaijan, were in a neutral and inactive state, but Russia’s war against Ukraine is changing this situation.
Following Russia’s attack on Ukraine, a new consideration was formed for the development of relations between the United States and the Republic of Azerbaijan, and it was an energy driver. Although this consideration has always been considered by the United States, it has recently been highlighted and is the main defining factor of Baku-Washington relations. Because, the South Caucasus hosts important infrastructure and energy transmission pipelines that can transport Caspian Sea oil and gas to Europe through Turkey.
This issue plays an important role in reducing Europe’s dependence on Russian energy. With Russia’s attack on Ukraine and imposition of Western sanctions against Russia, two issues related to the Republic of Azerbaijan were very important for the United States: first, to ensure the transfer of energy from the Republic of Azerbaijan to Europe. Second, the Republic of Azerbaijan not to violate Russian sanctions.
In this regard, in recent weeks and months, the policy of the Biden administration has become more active in the South Caucasus region. The regular interactions and visits of senior Washington officials and transmission of Biden’s personal messages are proof of this. The United States seeks to encourage Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan to make peace and reconciliation, so that it will be easier to transfer oil and gas from the Republic of Azerbaijan to Europe.
In fact, Western countries know very well that the requirement for the safe transfer of energy from the Caucasus region to Europe is that the Republic of Azerbaijan and Armenia achieve peace and compromise, therefore the United States seeks to create an environment for dialogue and, as a result, peace between the Republic of Azerbaijan and Armenia. If peace is achieved, the US administration will not be accused of ignoring the interests of Armenia, especially by the Armenian lobby. On the other hand, the Republic of Azerbaijan also uses the privilege of the West’s need for its energy for the recognition of what it achieved in the 2020 war. Therefore, the mutual need of the US and the Republic of Azerbaijan has caused the Yerevan-Baku peace to be tied to the issue of energy.
In conclusion, it should be said that the consequences of the war in Ukraine not only forced the Biden administration to reconsider the previous policies of the White House towards countries such as Saudi Arabia and Venezuela, but also caused the attention of the United States to be drawn once again to the Caucasus region and specifically to the Republic of Azerbaijan. By activating its policy in the Caucasus, the Biden administration seeks to both ensure the safe transfer of energy and not allow the situation in the South Caucasus to get out of its control and fall under the full influence of Russia. In the meantime, this new policy of the US administration is also favorable for the Baku government, because it creates a balance between the policies of Moscow and Washington.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading