Evolution in NATO’s Attitude towards Asia-Pacific

2022/07/09 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: The recent NATO meeting in Spain on 29-30 of June 2022, regardless of the fact that it was held during the Ukraine crisis and the approach of the alliance to that crisis, reveals the issue of joining new members and the future direction of the alliance is important for another reason which is the presence of heads of four the Asian countries, namely Australia, South Korea, Japan and New Zealand, in that meeting, which are considered as being among NATO’s global partners. This shows the importance of examining NATO’s attitude towards the Asia-Pacific region. Mohammad Javad Ghahermani - Expert on China issues

Presence of leaders of the four countries shows that both those countries want to develop relations with NATO and also European countries have placed paying attention to the Asia Pacific in the agenda of missions of NATO. If we look back, China has not been mentioned at all in the 2010 document on strategic concept of NATO titled “Active Engagement, Modern Defense”; however, NATO’s perception of China’s threat and consequently the Asia-Pacific region has changed gradually.
The most important manifestation of that change in perception was revealed in the statement of the NATO summit in 2021, in which it is pointed out that China’s growing influence could create challenges that NATO as an alliance should put them on its agenda. According to the statement, China’s declared goals and its bold behavior are a systematic challenge for the international rule-based order. In addition, “NATO Vision 2030”, which was approved by the members in July 2021, while listing China and Russia as countries that weaken such order, also deals with the issue that the rise of China will fundamentally change the balance of power.
The same issue has been referred to in NATO’s strategic concept, which was approved on Wednesday, June 29, 2022. According to the new document, China’s declared goals and ambitions challenge the interests, security and values of the members. Also, the deepening of the Beijing-Moscow strategic partnership has been described as a factor weakening the rule-based international order. The same thing has been repeated in the statement of the Madrid meeting. Such emphasis clearly show the change of attitude of NATO towards the People’s Republic of China.
At the same time, in order to understand NATO’s approach to the Asia-Pacific, the individual or bilateral or multilateral actions and policies of European countries through cooperation with the United States or cooperation with regional countries cannot be ignored. In the meantime, the United States is considered to be an activist that has played a serious role in guiding European countries to adopt a tougher approach against China and its increasing presence in the Asia-Pacific. In the Indo-Pacific strategy document of the White House, which was published in February 2022, while pointing to the attention of American allies and partners outside the Asia-Pacific to this region, it is claimed that the United States seeks to link the Indo-Pacific and the Euro-Atlantic with other regions through joint agendas that will also be the motivation and reason for collective action. The call made by Ben Sasse, the US Republican Senator, for establishing “Pacific NATO” is significant in this regard.
However, it is also necessary to point out that although some European countries had previously expressed concern about the rise of China, the war in Ukraine prepared the ground for greater coordination between the United States and Europe; in other words, the coordination of the parties will not be limited to European issues. In addition, the war in Ukraine has led to increased concerns among China’s rival countries in the Asia-Pacific; because it has fueled some kind of insecurity feeling in those countries.
On the other hand, Beijing, expressing concern about those developments, considers it as the expansion of that military bloc to the Asia-Pacific. Wang Van Bin, the spokesman of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China, claimed that NATO has already disturbed the stability in Europe, therefore, it should not pursue such measure in the Asia-Pacific and the entire world. This comment shows well the Chinese perception of the current developments.
In general, such developments show that the security dynamics of the Asia-Pacific region have seriously changed compared to the past. The emphasis of the United States and its allies on the mechanism of the “Quadrilateral Security Dialogue”, known as “QUAD”, establishment of ACOs, the initiative of the “Partners in the Blue Pacific” consisting of the United States, Australia, New Zealand, Japan and Britain, or Beijing’s efforts to advance the “Vision of Joint Development” with an aim of developing relations with the Pacific islands, along with the expansion of competitions and military activities, show the changes achieved. At the same time, as a concluding point, it can be said that cooperation of partners outside the Asia-Pacific with the US policies in this region can be considered as a serious success for the foreign policy of the Biden administration.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading