Evolution in NATO’s Attitude towards Asia-Pacific

2022/07/09 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: The recent NATO meeting in Spain on 29-30 of June 2022, regardless of the fact that it was held during the Ukraine crisis and the approach of the alliance to that crisis, reveals the issue of joining new members and the future direction of the alliance is important for another reason which is the presence of heads of four the Asian countries, namely Australia, South Korea, Japan and New Zealand, in that meeting, which are considered as being among NATO’s global partners. This shows the importance of examining NATO’s attitude towards the Asia-Pacific region. Mohammad Javad Ghahermani - Expert on China issues

Presence of leaders of the four countries shows that both those countries want to develop relations with NATO and also European countries have placed paying attention to the Asia Pacific in the agenda of missions of NATO. If we look back, China has not been mentioned at all in the 2010 document on strategic concept of NATO titled “Active Engagement, Modern Defense”; however, NATO’s perception of China’s threat and consequently the Asia-Pacific region has changed gradually.
The most important manifestation of that change in perception was revealed in the statement of the NATO summit in 2021, in which it is pointed out that China’s growing influence could create challenges that NATO as an alliance should put them on its agenda. According to the statement, China’s declared goals and its bold behavior are a systematic challenge for the international rule-based order. In addition, “NATO Vision 2030”, which was approved by the members in July 2021, while listing China and Russia as countries that weaken such order, also deals with the issue that the rise of China will fundamentally change the balance of power.
The same issue has been referred to in NATO’s strategic concept, which was approved on Wednesday, June 29, 2022. According to the new document, China’s declared goals and ambitions challenge the interests, security and values of the members. Also, the deepening of the Beijing-Moscow strategic partnership has been described as a factor weakening the rule-based international order. The same thing has been repeated in the statement of the Madrid meeting. Such emphasis clearly show the change of attitude of NATO towards the People’s Republic of China.
At the same time, in order to understand NATO’s approach to the Asia-Pacific, the individual or bilateral or multilateral actions and policies of European countries through cooperation with the United States or cooperation with regional countries cannot be ignored. In the meantime, the United States is considered to be an activist that has played a serious role in guiding European countries to adopt a tougher approach against China and its increasing presence in the Asia-Pacific. In the Indo-Pacific strategy document of the White House, which was published in February 2022, while pointing to the attention of American allies and partners outside the Asia-Pacific to this region, it is claimed that the United States seeks to link the Indo-Pacific and the Euro-Atlantic with other regions through joint agendas that will also be the motivation and reason for collective action. The call made by Ben Sasse, the US Republican Senator, for establishing “Pacific NATO” is significant in this regard.
However, it is also necessary to point out that although some European countries had previously expressed concern about the rise of China, the war in Ukraine prepared the ground for greater coordination between the United States and Europe; in other words, the coordination of the parties will not be limited to European issues. In addition, the war in Ukraine has led to increased concerns among China’s rival countries in the Asia-Pacific; because it has fueled some kind of insecurity feeling in those countries.
On the other hand, Beijing, expressing concern about those developments, considers it as the expansion of that military bloc to the Asia-Pacific. Wang Van Bin, the spokesman of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China, claimed that NATO has already disturbed the stability in Europe, therefore, it should not pursue such measure in the Asia-Pacific and the entire world. This comment shows well the Chinese perception of the current developments.
In general, such developments show that the security dynamics of the Asia-Pacific region have seriously changed compared to the past. The emphasis of the United States and its allies on the mechanism of the “Quadrilateral Security Dialogue”, known as “QUAD”, establishment of ACOs, the initiative of the “Partners in the Blue Pacific” consisting of the United States, Australia, New Zealand, Japan and Britain, or Beijing’s efforts to advance the “Vision of Joint Development” with an aim of developing relations with the Pacific islands, along with the expansion of competitions and military activities, show the changes achieved. At the same time, as a concluding point, it can be said that cooperation of partners outside the Asia-Pacific with the US policies in this region can be considered as a serious success for the foreign policy of the Biden administration.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading