loader image

Strategic Consequences for NATO Membership of Sweden & Finland

2022/05/24 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: During the recent day, we witnessed that Sweden and Finland expressed their decision to join NATO. Traditionally, the two countries have followed the policy of non-membership in any alliance. Even during the Cold War, they adhered to their policy. The neutrality policy was also considered as an important factor to secure the stability of North Europe by Moscow, which had been admitted by European countries as well. Dr. Mohammad Medhi Mazaheri, University Professor

Now, with the new application by the two countries, however, NATO has called it as deepening cooperation with Finland and Sweden and expressed its satisfaction, but Russian authorities have publicly interpreted the measure as making enemy with Russia. In a situation as such, the question crossed into one’s mind that basically what is the reason for raising such an application by Sweden and Finland? And what will be the strategic consequences of their application to join NATO?

To reply the first question, it must be said that although international media try to introduce Russian invasion of Ukraine as the only source of concern to these two Northern European countries and their decision to join NATO, and indeed, it represents a part of real puzzle too; but it is not definitely the whole truth. If we see the stage of major powers’ strategic games from a rather broader perspective, then we will realize that after the change of the U.S. national security strategy within the recent years, and the country’s change of approach as well as its twist of attention  from the Middle East and the Persian Gulf to China and Russia, the effort to strengthen NATO and make Europe unified against Russia in order to weaken one of the two competitors, i.e. Russia, has been a top issue on the U.S. strategic programs.

Therefore, attention must be paid to the point that expression of willingness of the two Scandinavian countries to join NATO as members was not a merely an internal decision based on their security requirements but a decision that has been taken under the U.S. guidance and support. Signing a new contract by Finland to buy 64 F-35 fighters from the U.S. in February 2021 is a solid evidence to substantiate it. Based on this, if Sweden and Finland join NATO, the European Union will place itself against Russia more than ever, and a kind of overall pressure will be exerted on Russia as an agenda, and this is what the U.S. authorities are looking for; weakening Russia at the cost borne by its Alliances. Therefore, with NATO expansion and strengthening the military power of NATO’s European section, Europeans partnership to contain Russia will be increased and the U.S. can contain China with an upper hand.

To reply the second question; on the upcoming strategic consequences of joining Sweden and Finland to NATO. It must be said that this will lead to further expansion and strengthening of NATO, and thus tightening the siege of Russia, and consequently, security ambiance as well as tension levels will be boosted in the Northern Europe region for sure. Although Finland and Sweden do not have large population and big military budgets, but they enjoy having modern armies as well as optimized military industrial – technological infrastructure. However, due to their concerns about Russian threat, they have increased their military budget during the recent years. Finland increased its military budget from three to five billion dollar, and Sweden increased it from five to seven billion dollar after the outbreak of war in Ukraine. Therefore, the membership of the two countries will increase NATO power and its further comprehensive.

Russians have openly acknowledged the joining of Sweden and Finland to North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) as a serious danger to them. Thus, in case the two countries become NATO members, in not a far future, we will witness a military and political confrontation between Russia and the West. Based on this, deployment of missiles capable of carrying nuclear warhead along the Russian border with Finland and other European countries by Kremlin, invading other Micronesia European countries that have common borders with Russia, halting the export or making energy carriers expensive as a leverage against European countries and of course, Kremlin’s effort to align and probably setting up a counterpart military pact are among some mechanisms that Moscow may proceed with in reaction to the decision made by the two countries.

Therefore, NATO expansion with new members will not maintain security and stability for European countries, instead, it will make them confront with Russia and turn Europe into an instrument to cater the U.S. objectives and interests, distort the political and economic development of the Green Continent, and ultimately turn Eastern and Northern Europe regions to a new hotspot in the global geopolitical map.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Single-State, Iran’s solution to the Palestinian crisis

Strategic Council online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, in an interview with France 24 Español, explained Iran’s approach to the Gaza war and outlined the region’s future after this bitter historical event.

Organizing Immigration Issue, Cause of Escalation of Divergence in EU

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on European affairs stated that the European Union is faced with the challenge of conflict in some different opinions and policies among member countries, which can affect the overall approach to immigration in Europe. She noted that when the member states follow different paths, the principle of solidarity and cooperation of the Union is distorted and can challenge the unity of the Union.

Germany’s “New Defense Policy Guidelines”: Return of Germanic People to Age of Militarism?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: For the first time in more than a decade, Germany issued its “new defense policy guidelines,” and “Boris Pistorius,” the German Minister of Defense, asked the pillars of his country to be “ready for a war” and “capable of defense.” He has pledged to strengthen the army to become the backbone of European deterrence and collective defense.
Hamideh Safamanesh – International relations researcher

NATO’s Ambiguous Mission in Iraq New Plan for Socio-Cultural Influence

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations professor said that although NATO’s training mission for the Iraqi police forces is carried out in line with preventing ISIS from regaining power, in fact, NATO has decided to develop the scope of its mission in Iraq, noted: NATO, and the United States at its head, is looking for influence in the social body of Arab countries, especially Iraq, to advance its targets while shaping the intellectual formation and organizing the police body against the Resistance.

Consequences, Prospects of Continuation of Ground Operations of Zionist Regime in Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the continuation of the ground operations of the Zionist regime in Gaza and the success of the Hamas resistance forces in crippling their military equipment and inflicting heavy casualties on them, important questions can be raised about the prospect of that military invasion.
Hamid Khoshayand – Expert on regional affairs

France vs. Baku and Ankara in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations university professor stated that Paris is trying not to allow the situation in the Caucasus to progress as desired by the Republic of Azerbaijan and Turkey and hopes the situation can be shaped as much as possible in line with French interests through military assistance, adding: France, after Russia, is the second largest foreign investor in Armenia since 2016. This country is trying to create a rift between Armenia and Russia by strengthening ties with Armenia. France’s military support to Armenia is an important and new development that we are witnessing after the weakening of Russia’s position in Armenia.

Reasons for Ineffectiveness of Riyadh Summit Concerning Expectations of Gazans

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Recently, we witnessed an extraordinary summit of Islamic countries in Riyadh. The Palestinians, especially the people of Gaza, had built hope on the meeting, and it was expected that at the end of it, we would see a collective, serious, and deterrent decision by the Islamic countries. But, unfortunately, such expectations were not met.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University professor

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Single-State, Iran’s solution to the Palestinian crisis

Strategic Council online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, in an interview with France 24 Español, explained Iran’s approach to the Gaza war and outlined the region’s future after this bitter historical event.

Organizing Immigration Issue, Cause of Escalation of Divergence in EU

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on European affairs stated that the European Union is faced with the challenge of conflict in some different opinions and policies among member countries, which can affect the overall approach to immigration in Europe. She noted that when the member states follow different paths, the principle of solidarity and cooperation of the Union is distorted and can challenge the unity of the Union.

Germany’s “New Defense Policy Guidelines”: Return of Germanic People to Age of Militarism?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: For the first time in more than a decade, Germany issued its “new defense policy guidelines,” and “Boris Pistorius,” the German Minister of Defense, asked the pillars of his country to be “ready for a war” and “capable of defense.” He has pledged to strengthen the army to become the backbone of European deterrence and collective defense.
Hamideh Safamanesh – International relations researcher

NATO’s Ambiguous Mission in Iraq New Plan for Socio-Cultural Influence

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations professor said that although NATO’s training mission for the Iraqi police forces is carried out in line with preventing ISIS from regaining power, in fact, NATO has decided to develop the scope of its mission in Iraq, noted: NATO, and the United States at its head, is looking for influence in the social body of Arab countries, especially Iraq, to advance its targets while shaping the intellectual formation and organizing the police body against the Resistance.

Consequences, Prospects of Continuation of Ground Operations of Zionist Regime in Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the continuation of the ground operations of the Zionist regime in Gaza and the success of the Hamas resistance forces in crippling their military equipment and inflicting heavy casualties on them, important questions can be raised about the prospect of that military invasion.
Hamid Khoshayand – Expert on regional affairs

France vs. Baku and Ankara in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations university professor stated that Paris is trying not to allow the situation in the Caucasus to progress as desired by the Republic of Azerbaijan and Turkey and hopes the situation can be shaped as much as possible in line with French interests through military assistance, adding: France, after Russia, is the second largest foreign investor in Armenia since 2016. This country is trying to create a rift between Armenia and Russia by strengthening ties with Armenia. France’s military support to Armenia is an important and new development that we are witnessing after the weakening of Russia’s position in Armenia.

Reasons for Ineffectiveness of Riyadh Summit Concerning Expectations of Gazans

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Recently, we witnessed an extraordinary summit of Islamic countries in Riyadh. The Palestinians, especially the people of Gaza, had built hope on the meeting, and it was expected that at the end of it, we would see a collective, serious, and deterrent decision by the Islamic countries. But, unfortunately, such expectations were not met.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University professor

Loading