Components of the threat to national security from the perspective of the United States

2022/03/31 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online-Interview: An expert of Middle East issues, referring to the Annual Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community and the Washington’s approaches to threat, said after the Second World War and distribution of war spoils among the conquerors, despite some common concerns between the two poles of East and West, the national security threat component changed based on variables from the Second World War.

Hassan Hanizadeh told the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations that Britain and France, as two European colonial powers, reduced their spheres of influence in Southeast, West Asia and Africa and moved towards rebuilding their national economies.

“They believe that a young offensive power called the United States, which has been present on the world stage since the Second World War, can provide a good shield for European countries”, he said, adding that in the final years of the Second World War, the United States carried out a nuclear attack on the two major cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan, effectively sending the message to the world that the United States would be in charge of major international policy.

Hanizadeh said that the former Soviet Union after the Second World War rebuilt its military power to lead the Eastern world and influence global variables, as well as enter US and European spheres of influence.

He added that from then on, the rivalry between the two poles of communism and Western capitalism began, in the light of which the components of national security in large countries, including the United States, the former Soviet Union and Europe, changed.

“The Marshall Plan to reduce Soviet spheres of influence in Western and Eastern Europe helped rebuild the economies of Western nations affected by the devastation of the Second World War. But there was also a concern for the United States and Europe, which was the increase in military power and the growing influence of the former Soviet Union in the Arab and Islamic countries, which reduced American influence in the East”, he said, adding that from 1948, at the same time as the Marshall Plan, competition for the expansion of the geographical sphere of influence of the two great poles of the East and the West, the Soviet Union and the United States, intensified, leading to a new polarization in the world.

According to Hanizadeh, since then, and specifically since 1950, the US Congress has approved the allocation of 100 billion dollars annually to 16 US intelligence agencies within the Pentagon’s annual budget to counter the influence of communism in the world and in the West.

He said that the United States spent a total of 4 trillion dollars, from 1950 to 1990, when the Soviet Union collapsed, adding that it is natural that the components of the US national security threat changed during this 40-year period, and the US focus on weakening the former Soviet Union’s position in the world became one of the components of the national security threat.

He said that after the collapse of the Soviet Union, two completely different poles emerged in two separate areas on the world stage, influencing the components of the defined national security threat to the United States.

“Meanwhile, the rise of China to dominate world markets and the emergence of the Islamic Republic of Iran, as an ideological country that opposes the influential global Zionism and American hegemony, changed the view of the United States and the West on the concept of national security threat.”

Hanizadeh said that over the past two decades, as Vladimir Putin emerged as Russia’s new leader in the international arena, concerns in the United States and the West have grown about the re-establishment of a new Russian power.

“Putin, who dreamed of rebuilding the Russian Empire, quickly turned Russia into an influential world power”.

According to him, the active presence of Russian troops in Syria over the past decade is a clear indication of Putin’s goals for expanding Russian sphere of influence.

Asked about the role of Iran, he said Iran also emerged as a power in the West Asian region after the war imposed by the former Baathist regime in Iraq, which led to a change in the region’s political chess in favor of Islamic nations.

He said although China has significant nuclear power, it is a serious economic rival to the United States and Europe; because China’s practical domination of commodity-based markets reduced the dollar’s influence in world markets.

“Three different powers, namely Russia’s military power, China’s economic power, and Iran’s influential ideological power, prompted the United States and the West to draw a new roadmap for reducing the sphere of influence of these three different powers.”

The use of sanctions, the creation of a negative political and media atmosphere, the incitement of peripheral countries, the organization of social uprisings and the formation of regional NATO are considered part of US and Western policy against these three powers, he said referring to the Western efforts to contain Iran, Russia and China.

Hanizadeh added that Taiwan’s incitement against China, NATO’s influence in Ukraine that led to the war between Russia and that country, as well as the crisis in Yemen, Syria, Iraq and Lebanon as areas of Iranian influence, are part of US policy in the region.

He said that the United States and the West will therefore make every effort to influence public opinion in order to weaken the power of Russia, Iran and China as centers of threat to the West, and in this regard, it will make good use of its allies in the region to counter it.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

An Analysis of South Korea’s Response to Trump’s Tariff Policy

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, a new wave of economic protectionism in the form of tariff policies has impacted global trade. One of the first countries targeted by these tariffs was South Korea—a nation whose economy heavily relies on exports, particularly to the American market.

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Objectives of Western Military Support Escalation for the Zionist Regime After the Ceasefire with Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asia affairs expert stated that following the imposition of a ceasefire on the Zionist regime on June 23, 2025, after its military aggression against Iran, reports from Arab sources indicate the arrival of 17 heavy transport aircraft carrying military equipment from the United States and Germany to the Occupied Territories. This move, which the Iraqi media “Naya” describes as part of Western efforts to rebuild the Zionist regime’s military capabilities after heavy losses in the 12-day war with Iran, poses a serious threat to regional peace and Iran’s nuclear negotiations.

Netanyahu’s Tactics to Evade Trial Under Pretext of Security and Regional Developments

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An Israeli regime affairs researcher stated: The Zionist regime media recently announced that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of this regime, has requested a two-week postponement of his trial for security reasons and regional developments. On Sunday, news also emerged that the “Occupied Jerusalem” district court agreed to postpone Netanyahu’s trial by one week. This decision followed the Zionist regime Prime Minister summoning officials from the Foreign Intelligence Service (Mossad) and Military Intelligence Organization (Aman) to a confidential session held at this court to explain the reasons for his request to delay his trial by two weeks.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

An Analysis of South Korea’s Response to Trump’s Tariff Policy

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, a new wave of economic protectionism in the form of tariff policies has impacted global trade. One of the first countries targeted by these tariffs was South Korea—a nation whose economy heavily relies on exports, particularly to the American market.

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Objectives of Western Military Support Escalation for the Zionist Regime After the Ceasefire with Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asia affairs expert stated that following the imposition of a ceasefire on the Zionist regime on June 23, 2025, after its military aggression against Iran, reports from Arab sources indicate the arrival of 17 heavy transport aircraft carrying military equipment from the United States and Germany to the Occupied Territories. This move, which the Iraqi media “Naya” describes as part of Western efforts to rebuild the Zionist regime’s military capabilities after heavy losses in the 12-day war with Iran, poses a serious threat to regional peace and Iran’s nuclear negotiations.

Netanyahu’s Tactics to Evade Trial Under Pretext of Security and Regional Developments

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An Israeli regime affairs researcher stated: The Zionist regime media recently announced that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of this regime, has requested a two-week postponement of his trial for security reasons and regional developments. On Sunday, news also emerged that the “Occupied Jerusalem” district court agreed to postpone Netanyahu’s trial by one week. This decision followed the Zionist regime Prime Minister summoning officials from the Foreign Intelligence Service (Mossad) and Military Intelligence Organization (Aman) to a confidential session held at this court to explain the reasons for his request to delay his trial by two weeks.

Loading
Samir Design Group گروه طراحی سمیر