Normalization of Bahrain-Zionist Regime Relations; a Threat to Persian Gulf Security

2022/01/12 | interview, political, top news

Council Online Strategic - Interview: An expert on the Middle East affairs commenting on the consequences of Bahrain’s decision to normalize relations with the Zionist regime said: Normalization of relations between the small country of Bahrain and the regime will not have much effect on changing the balance of power in favor of Tel Aviv, but in terms of the movements of the Palestinian militants, this hasty relationship is like a poisoned dagger that has stabbed the Palestinian people on the back.

Hassan Hanizadeh, speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, said: Bahrain, as the smallest member of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council – PGCC), has been embroiled in a sharp rift between the nation and the government for nearly 11 years, and due to the Al-Khalifa regime’s suppressive methods towards the Bahraini people, the violence on the island is becoming more widespread every day.

The expert stressed that since February 2011, when the Arab uprisings began, the Bahraini people have been protesting against the monopoly of power in the hands of the Al-Khalifa family, demanding a change in the constitution, free and democratic elections, and the division of power among all political currents in Bahrain.

He continued: But the Al-Khalifa regime, instead of constructive interaction with the protesters, with the logistical and intelligence support of Britain and the Zionist regime, took the path of suppressing the demonstrations; in which more than 5,000 young Bahraini protesters were arrested and imprisoned.

Hanizadeh, examining role of Riyadh in the developments of Bahrain said: Saudi Arabia played an important role in suppressing the people of Bahrain in 2012 by sending two commando battalions to Bahrain because of the existence of Wahhabi ties with the Al-Khalifa dynasty, at the same time, Britain sent its expert security agents to the island to confront the Bahraini protesters.

According to the expert, although the Bahraini regime refuses to provide statistics on the number of martyrs and wounded, according to a collection of reports by human rights organizations, over 2,000 people have been killed and injured in the past 11 years, which is very high given Bahrain’s limited number of population.

Depriving Bahrainis of national citizenship, violation of UN Charter of Human Rights

The expert on the Middle East affairs noted that more than 800 Bahraini nationals had been stripped of their citizenship during this period due to their opposition to the Al-Khalifa regime which is in stark contrast to Article 15 of the UN Charter of Human Rights, which recognizes the citizenship of all citizens as an inalienable right of the nations.

He continued: Over the past 11 years, the United States, some Western governments and the Zionist regime, along with some countries in the region such as Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Egypt, have not hesitated to help the Bahraini regime to suppress the protesters, and human rights groups have remained silent in the face of such crimes.

After addressing Bahrain’s internal problems, Hanizadeh said that the Al-Khalifa regime, due to its internal political and social crisis and the need to overcome the crisis, along with the United Arab Emirates, established public relationship with the Israeli regime.

He explained: Of course, the Bahraini government has had secret relations with the Zionist regime in recent years in order to use the capacity of the Zionist lobby to use force against its opponents.

The expert on the Middle East affairs, commenting on the consequences of such normalization said: Although this relationship will not have much effect on the situation of the Palestinian people, it will pave the way for Israel’s creeping and subcutaneous infiltration into the southern Persian Gulf, and this presence could be dangerous for the security of the Persian Gulf.

He continued: Currently, the Al-Khalifa regime has established political and economic relations with the Zionist regime due to the unstable internal conditions and in order to get out of the political stalemate, but Bahrain’s geopolitical capacity is not as such that the Israeli regime could improve its regional position.

According to Hanizadeh, the only advantage of the Zionist regime in establishing relations with Bahrain is that through its physical presence on the island, it can establish a foothold in the Persian Gulf in the future and disrupt maritime security.

As for the reactions to Al-Khalifa’s decision, the expert said: It is natural that the Bahraini people oppose the establishment of a political relationship between the two Al-Khalifa and Israel regimes, and many Bahraini opposition leaders have issued strong statements condemning the relationship, citing it as a result of structural weakness of the Al-Khalifa.

Finally, he said that this relationship is not between the two nations, but between the two regimes, and the people of Bahrain have always considered themselves defenders of the rights of the oppressed Palestinian people.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading