loader image

Emirati Official’s Tehran Visit an Effective Step with Strategic Consequences

2021/12/23 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: The recent visit of the national security adviser of the UAE, Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, to Iran after years of tension and cold relations between the two countries, caused the public opinion and the international media to evaluate the purpose of this trip in line with de-escalation and also the beginning of a new era between Tehran and Abu Dhabi and even the region. Hossein Sayyahi - Researcher on international affairs

During the visit, Tahnoon bin Zayed met with the Iranian President, Seyyed Ebrahim Raisi and Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council Ali Shamkhani, and announced that Iran is a large and powerful country in the region with a unique geopolitical position, therefore, the development of warm and fraternal relations between Abu Dhabi and Tehran is a priority of foreign policies of his country.

Such an approach and comment led to the announcement of positive reciprocal positions by the officials of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Criticizing the behavior of the great powers in the region, the president spoke about the common goals and security of Muslim countries in the region. Admiral Shamkhani, while mentioning the potential for cooperation between the neighbors in the region, considered the visit of his Emirati counterpart to Iran as the beginning of a new round of bilateral relations between the two countries.

Examining the recent approach of the UAE, it seems that the country has pursued a kind of pragmatic foreign policy that is identified with economic goals and with the approach of de-escalating tensions with its neighbors. With the withdrawal from the war in Yemen, the improvement of relations with Turkey, the end of sanctions against Qatar, as well as the end of the intervention in Libya, this time it has put de-escalation of tensions with its big neighbor, that is to say Iran, on the agenda. Despite the optimism created, at the same time as the security officials of the two countries meet, there will be complex and difficult obstacles and issues on the way of establishing an effective relationship between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the United Arab Emirates.

The Abraham Accords and the relations established between Abu Dhabi and Tel Aviv and its regional consequences can be considered as one of the obstacles to strengthening cooperation between Iran and the UAE.

On the other hand, the security arrangements of the region can be mentioned as the most important factor shaping the relations between Tehran and Abu Dhabi and even other countries in the region. In addition to Abu Dhabi waiting for determination of the outcome of Iran nuclear talks, the gradual withdrawal of the United States from the region and the reduction of US defense systems in the Persian Gulf states have reduced the decision-making options for the UAE and even Saudi Arabia. Developments in the security structure and the weakening of the US security umbrella in the region have ended the game of the time of Trump’s presidency against Iran.

At present, Biden’s Democratic administration, simultaneously with pursuing nuclear talks with the Islamic Republic of Iran, has apparently replaced pressure and maximum confrontation with de-escalation. As the policy of tough action against Iran gradually diminishes, it is assumed that the UAE, which was a supporter of Trump’s tough policies against Iran during his presidency, will no longer be inclined to confront its neighbor. It is also unlikely that Abu Dhabi will want to take part in Tel Aviv’s aggressive stance and policies against Tehran without taking advantage of the US security umbrella.

The UAE needs regional stability and security to develop and expand its economic diversity, as well as reduce tensions with its effective and powerful neighbor.

It has shown that it will not sacrifice its trade and economic security even at the height of tensions with Iran. In 2019, in the wake of US and regional allies’ efforts to pose a security challenge to Iran, the Emirati ship was targeted, prompting Abu Dhabi and Tehran to sign a memorandum of understanding to strengthen border cooperation.

Abu Dhabi seems to have come to the conclusion that increasing the level of confrontation, joining costly competitions and shaping the erosive balances in the region cannot be pursued without damaging the country’s trade identity.

As the UAE security adviser has pointed out, Iran is an important and great regional power, and the inequality of power components between Abu Dhabi and Tehran will cause that country to either take steps to reduce tensions or to create a balancing factor before Iran such as building alliances with other countries in the region. An alliance that, as was mentioned, would have very little chance for being effective without the effective presence of the United States and its security umbrella.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

New EU Strategy on Cooperation with the Persian Gulf, Its Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Guest Opinion: Normalization of Iran-Saudi relations with China’s mediation, which is an indication of Beijing’s more significant influence and role in new regional trends in the Middle East, increased speculations about the possibility of changes in the geostrategy of other powers.
Abbas Aslani – Expert on international relations

Foreign Policy Challenges of the New Greek Government

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the holding of the national elections in Greece on May 21, although the winning party announced priorities of its future government to be mainly improvement of the economic situation, the continuation of the national policy in foreign relations, security, and immigration would be most important challenges for this EU and NATO member country. Although the new leaders defend the continuation of the foreign and defense policy, strengthening of the country’s armed forces, creation of solid alliances, and development of the weapons program over the past four years, they differ in the field of energy exploration, the militarization of some islands in the Aegean Sea, and the issue of refugees.
Mahmoud Fazeli – International Affairs analyst

Arming Taiwan, One of the US Pressure Levers against China

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An analyst of international affairs called the provision of various types of US military-armament aid to Taiwan one of the foundations of Washington’ towards that island and said: The Chinese have intelligently realized that the US measures must be accompanied by proportionate reactions to make them fully understand that Beijing will not sit idly by the expansion of US-Taiwan relations and the increasing dispatch of US weapons to Taiwan.

What is the new position of the dollar in the global economy?

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: The confrontation between Americanization and the Chineseization of the world has created a new acting field. While the Chinese side’s efforts to reduce the international power of the dollar and increase the global acceptance of the yuan have an increasing trend, it is not possible to correctly analyze and scenarioize the possible futures of this confrontation and the new arena of acting by relying on emotional and exaggerated reactions, and of course far from scientific neutrality.
Reza Majidzadeh—Researcher of economics

Fate of Afghanistan under Shadow of Taliban-Intl. Community Conflict

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on Afghanistan affairs, criticizing the weak role and performance of the United Nations regarding Afghanistan, emphasized: The difference of views, heterogeneous and different performances of countries regarding Afghanistan, along with the weak role of the United Nations, have completed the cycle of failure and in this situation, with the increasing risk of isolation of the Taliban, their leadership is gaining more power.

Establishing Chinese order in the region is one of the strategic goals of the Islamabad meeting

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on Asian issues considered the tripartite meeting in Islamabad regarding Afghanistan as another Chinese initiative to establish peace and stability in the region by using economic tools, adding that this meeting arose from the security concerns of Pakistan and China concerning the realization of their political and economic interests in Afghanistan.

The strategic importance of resuming relations between Iran and Egypt

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: After the resumption of diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia created a wave of positive developments in the region and encouraged other Persian Gulf countries to resume or strengthen ties with the Islamic Republic of Iran, now the news indicates that Iran and Egypt with the mediation of Iraq are trying to resume diplomatic relations.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University scholar

Strategic Importance of Organizing Legal Acceptance of Afghans in Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Former official in charge of Afghanistan Support Headquarters at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: Iranian people are witnessing the high and unusual presence of Afghan refugees, adding that vigilance is needed concerning their presence in the strategic context of cities, as well as to the possibility of targeted organization and possible use of them against the interests and security of Iran.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

New EU Strategy on Cooperation with the Persian Gulf, Its Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Guest Opinion: Normalization of Iran-Saudi relations with China’s mediation, which is an indication of Beijing’s more significant influence and role in new regional trends in the Middle East, increased speculations about the possibility of changes in the geostrategy of other powers.
Abbas Aslani – Expert on international relations

Foreign Policy Challenges of the New Greek Government

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the holding of the national elections in Greece on May 21, although the winning party announced priorities of its future government to be mainly improvement of the economic situation, the continuation of the national policy in foreign relations, security, and immigration would be most important challenges for this EU and NATO member country. Although the new leaders defend the continuation of the foreign and defense policy, strengthening of the country’s armed forces, creation of solid alliances, and development of the weapons program over the past four years, they differ in the field of energy exploration, the militarization of some islands in the Aegean Sea, and the issue of refugees.
Mahmoud Fazeli – International Affairs analyst

Arming Taiwan, One of the US Pressure Levers against China

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An analyst of international affairs called the provision of various types of US military-armament aid to Taiwan one of the foundations of Washington’ towards that island and said: The Chinese have intelligently realized that the US measures must be accompanied by proportionate reactions to make them fully understand that Beijing will not sit idly by the expansion of US-Taiwan relations and the increasing dispatch of US weapons to Taiwan.

What is the new position of the dollar in the global economy?

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: The confrontation between Americanization and the Chineseization of the world has created a new acting field. While the Chinese side’s efforts to reduce the international power of the dollar and increase the global acceptance of the yuan have an increasing trend, it is not possible to correctly analyze and scenarioize the possible futures of this confrontation and the new arena of acting by relying on emotional and exaggerated reactions, and of course far from scientific neutrality.
Reza Majidzadeh—Researcher of economics

Fate of Afghanistan under Shadow of Taliban-Intl. Community Conflict

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on Afghanistan affairs, criticizing the weak role and performance of the United Nations regarding Afghanistan, emphasized: The difference of views, heterogeneous and different performances of countries regarding Afghanistan, along with the weak role of the United Nations, have completed the cycle of failure and in this situation, with the increasing risk of isolation of the Taliban, their leadership is gaining more power.

Establishing Chinese order in the region is one of the strategic goals of the Islamabad meeting

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on Asian issues considered the tripartite meeting in Islamabad regarding Afghanistan as another Chinese initiative to establish peace and stability in the region by using economic tools, adding that this meeting arose from the security concerns of Pakistan and China concerning the realization of their political and economic interests in Afghanistan.

The strategic importance of resuming relations between Iran and Egypt

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: After the resumption of diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia created a wave of positive developments in the region and encouraged other Persian Gulf countries to resume or strengthen ties with the Islamic Republic of Iran, now the news indicates that Iran and Egypt with the mediation of Iraq are trying to resume diplomatic relations.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University scholar

Strategic Importance of Organizing Legal Acceptance of Afghans in Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Former official in charge of Afghanistan Support Headquarters at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: Iranian people are witnessing the high and unusual presence of Afghan refugees, adding that vigilance is needed concerning their presence in the strategic context of cities, as well as to the possibility of targeted organization and possible use of them against the interests and security of Iran.

Loading