Factors Influencing Normalization of Ankara’s Relations with Abu Dhabi and Riyadh

2021/12/19 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: Turkey’s relations with the UAE and Saudi Arabia are moving towards normalization, and the main reason is primarily political; because the series of developments that caused tension in their relations have become completely ineffective today. Fatemeh Nekoolal Azad – Expert on international affairs

The beginning of the developments known as the Islamic Awakening and the Arab Spring in late 2010 and the subsequent developments caused a deep rift between the countries of the region and the redefinition of alliances and coalitions. In fact, because some countries evaluated the developments in countries such as Libya, Egypt, Syria and Yemen in line with their interests, they supported it, and some other countries, because they had different assessments, opposed the developments.

As a result, conflicts of interests between regional countries were inevitable. Turkey played a very active role in this field and, by supporting the development process, imagined that the necessary ground had been prepared to use and exploit the developments to its own advantage and in line with strengthening Ankara’s regional position.

Turkey practically defined its policy by supporting the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt and its branches in countries involved in political developments and crises. Such a position by Turkey was accompanied by one of the richest countries of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council (PGCC), that is to say Qatar and its famous television network, Al Jazeera. In implementing this policy, Ankara not only did not suffice to support the Brotherhood’s currents in Egypt, the Gaza Strip, Libya, Syria, Tunisia, and to some extent Yemen, politically and militarily, but also explicitly and openly opposed countries against the Brotherhood.

The positions adopted by Ankara and Qatar was opposed by Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates from the very beginning. Although they supported the removal of the heads of state such as Muammar Gaddafi in Libya or Bashar Assad in Syria, they did not want the Brotherhood to take power in the Arab world.

In fact, they saw the rise of a revolutionary movement such as the Muslim Brotherhood in conflict with the conservative spirit and nature of their policies, and assessed it as a challenge to their national security. For this reason, they did not sit idle and took practical actions.

The UAE and Saudi Arabia supported an army coup against Mohamed Morsi, the Egyptian President of the Brotherhood, in 2013 and, unlike Turkey, immediately recognized the government of General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi. Saudi Arabia and the UAE also supported the secular movement in Libya and provided political and military support to Khalifa Haftar.

In Yemen, too, the two countries launched wars against reformist currents such as the Houthis and branches of the Brotherhood. In Syria, despite Turkey’s high interests with Saudi Arabia and the UAE, the two Arab states refused to support extremist Islamic factions and gradually moved closer to the United States, supporting a Kurdish-Arab alliance east of the Euphrates which Turkey strongly opposed.

The dispute between Turkey and the UAE escalated when Ankara accused the UAE of supporting the 2016 summer coup against Erdogan. Also, following the siege of Qatar by Saudi Arabia and its allies such as the United Arab Emirates in 2017, Turkey announced its political-military support for Qatar, which itself further strained relations between Turkey and the Arab countries bordering the Persian Gulf. Tensions between Riyadh and Ankara escalated following the assassination of Jamal Khashoggi at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul in October 2018 and Turkey’s use of it against the reputation of the Saudi family and Crown Prince Mohammad Bin Salman himself.

The above-mentioned series of developments, which clouded Turkey’s relations with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, is fading today, and this factor has paved the way for the resumption of relations between the two sides. In fact, the severe repression of the Brotherhood in Egypt has completely discouraged Turkey from their gaining power; therefore, contrary to initial assessments, not only the Brotherhood did not succeed in the developments of the Islamic Awakening, but their position has become much weaker than before the 2011 developments.

This factor has made the UAE and Saudi Arabia no longer have the same concerns about the Muslim Brotherhood. In addition, Erdogan’s position has become much stronger since the 2016 coup, and he is no longer concerned about the coup and the policies of the coup supporters.

Meanwhile, not only has the siege of Qatar ended, but Qatar and other PGCC countries have moved towards de-escalating and normalizing relations with each other.

In addition, sensitivities about Khashoggi’s murder are over and there is nothing left for Turkey to take advantage of; therefore, it should be said that the main reason for the normalization of Turkey’s relations with the UAE and Saudi Arabia is primarily political; because the series of developments that caused tension in their relations became completely ineffective today, and the political ground has been prepared for the normalization of relations between them. In this regard, two other factors can be mentioned.

The first factor is the new policies of the UAE, which seeks to normalize relations with all countries. Not only has the country withdrawn from the war in Yemen, but it has also pursued a policy of normalizing relations with Qatar, Iran, Syria and Turkey, and intends to focus solely on the comprehensive development of the country.

The second factor is the constant pragmatism in Turkish foreign policy, which can change 180 degrees when necessary. This pragmatism prompted Turkey to normalize relations with Israel, Egypt, and the Persian Gulf states following Biden’s victory in the 2020 presidential election and for the fear of US sanctions. This pragmatism can help prevent the escalation of the economic crisis in Turkey.

In conclusion, it should be said that the main reason for the normalization of relations between those countries is political factors that can have positive economic consequences for the parties. The fact is that the costly crises in the Middle East have caused various countries to try to distance themselves from further involvement in those crises, and Turkey, along with Saudi Arabia, and especially the UAE, is among those countries.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Impact of Operation Cobweb on the Future Course of the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: While Donald Trump, the President of the United States, was pressuring the parties involved in the Ukraine war to initiate negotiations to end the conflict, Operation Cobweb emerged as an unexpected development that transformed the dynamics of this war. This operation, which led to the destruction of several Russian strategic Tu-22M3 bombers, has raised questions about the future of negotiations, the escalation of tensions, and its strategic implications for Russia’s foreign policy and relations with NATO.

Europe’s New Security Strategy Aimed at Defense Self-Sufficiency

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: On June 2, 2025, the Council of the European Union took an unprecedented step toward strengthening Europe’s military self-sufficiency by officially approving a new defense fund worth 150 billion euros. This decision, made after decades of institutional debate and effort in common security policy, is now regarded not merely as a technical or budgetary initiative but as a reflection of a paradigm shift in Europe’s strategic outlook on its security future.

Impact of the U.S.-China Tariff War on Iran’s Economy

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An economist and university faculty member stated that the temporary agreement between the U.S. and China to reduce trade tariffs, recently announced in Geneva, is a turning point in easing trade tensions between the two largest economies in the world. This development, which led to positive reactions in global markets and a rise in economic indicators, has indirect consequences for Iran’s economy.

Reasons for NATO’s Interest in a Military Partnership with Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asia affairs expert stated that Christoph Henzi, the new NATO commander in Iraq, recently emphasized the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO) continued commitment to coordinating and cooperating with Iraqi military and security institutions through experience-sharing, advisory services, and capacity-building.

Prospect of Military Confrontation Between Yemen’s Ansarullah and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia affairs analyst stated that the recent ceasefire agreement between Yemen’s Ansarullah and the U.S., mediated by Oman, led to the cessation of Ansarullah’s attacks on non-Israeli ships in the Red Sea and the suspension of American airstrikes. This agreement, reached after weeks of intense clashes—during which Ansarullah targeted the USS Harry Truman aircraft carrier with missile and drone attacks, inflicting over a billion dollars in losses on the U.S.—marks a turning point in Yemen’s strategic equations. Ansarullah’s military successes, from downing MQ-9 Reaper drones to missile strikes on Ben Gurion Airport, which halted its operations and sent millions of Zionists to shelters, have solidified its position as a key player in the Axis of Resistance.

An Analysis of the Escalating Isolation of Netanyahu Govt Worldwide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Netanyahu’s cabinet, which has recently launched a new military operation in Gaza, is insanely massacring civilians. The continuation of the war until the complete destruction of Gaza and its takeover is the ultimate goal of the Zionist regime’s recent military operation.

Reasons for the EU’s Cautious Approach Toward U.S. Tariff Hikes

Online Strategic Council – Interview: A European and American affairs expert stated that the European Union, due to its unstable economic situation and the Ukraine issue, is compelled to accommodate the U.S., and thus, it does not challenge America over the tariff hikes.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Impact of Operation Cobweb on the Future Course of the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: While Donald Trump, the President of the United States, was pressuring the parties involved in the Ukraine war to initiate negotiations to end the conflict, Operation Cobweb emerged as an unexpected development that transformed the dynamics of this war. This operation, which led to the destruction of several Russian strategic Tu-22M3 bombers, has raised questions about the future of negotiations, the escalation of tensions, and its strategic implications for Russia’s foreign policy and relations with NATO.

Europe’s New Security Strategy Aimed at Defense Self-Sufficiency

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: On June 2, 2025, the Council of the European Union took an unprecedented step toward strengthening Europe’s military self-sufficiency by officially approving a new defense fund worth 150 billion euros. This decision, made after decades of institutional debate and effort in common security policy, is now regarded not merely as a technical or budgetary initiative but as a reflection of a paradigm shift in Europe’s strategic outlook on its security future.

Impact of the U.S.-China Tariff War on Iran’s Economy

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An economist and university faculty member stated that the temporary agreement between the U.S. and China to reduce trade tariffs, recently announced in Geneva, is a turning point in easing trade tensions between the two largest economies in the world. This development, which led to positive reactions in global markets and a rise in economic indicators, has indirect consequences for Iran’s economy.

Reasons for NATO’s Interest in a Military Partnership with Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asia affairs expert stated that Christoph Henzi, the new NATO commander in Iraq, recently emphasized the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO) continued commitment to coordinating and cooperating with Iraqi military and security institutions through experience-sharing, advisory services, and capacity-building.

Prospect of Military Confrontation Between Yemen’s Ansarullah and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia affairs analyst stated that the recent ceasefire agreement between Yemen’s Ansarullah and the U.S., mediated by Oman, led to the cessation of Ansarullah’s attacks on non-Israeli ships in the Red Sea and the suspension of American airstrikes. This agreement, reached after weeks of intense clashes—during which Ansarullah targeted the USS Harry Truman aircraft carrier with missile and drone attacks, inflicting over a billion dollars in losses on the U.S.—marks a turning point in Yemen’s strategic equations. Ansarullah’s military successes, from downing MQ-9 Reaper drones to missile strikes on Ben Gurion Airport, which halted its operations and sent millions of Zionists to shelters, have solidified its position as a key player in the Axis of Resistance.

An Analysis of the Escalating Isolation of Netanyahu Govt Worldwide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Netanyahu’s cabinet, which has recently launched a new military operation in Gaza, is insanely massacring civilians. The continuation of the war until the complete destruction of Gaza and its takeover is the ultimate goal of the Zionist regime’s recent military operation.

Reasons for the EU’s Cautious Approach Toward U.S. Tariff Hikes

Online Strategic Council – Interview: A European and American affairs expert stated that the European Union, due to its unstable economic situation and the Ukraine issue, is compelled to accommodate the U.S., and thus, it does not challenge America over the tariff hikes.

Loading
Samir Design Group گروه طراحی سمیر