Biden’s US Targets of New Intervention in the Region

2021/12/16 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Interview: An expert on US affairs, commenting on the US President Joe Biden’s recent claims that one of the reasons for the US military presence outside the borders, including deployment of US troops in the Persian Gulf region such as Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Syria, is Iran’s regional activities, said: Although there are talks over a change in Washington’s approach in the Middle East region in line with implementation of Biden’s stated policies in that region, in general, it seems that the main foundations of the US foreign policy in the region have not changed much, rather the process of implementation of its policies has been subject to changes.

Zahra Sharifzadeh, speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, said: In the foreign policy of each country, factors such as intellectual foundations, the nature of the international system, the characteristics and attitude of the governing body, the capabilities of the country, the objective needs of the society, geographical variables, political culture and diplomacy are involved.

Sharifzadeh said: The main lines of the US foreign policy include internationalism, coalition building and global consensus, defending values ​​and identifying threats and the enemies.

The researcher on the US affairs, analyzing Biden’s policies toward the region explained: Biden is trying to take full advantage of the so-called benefits of Trump’s policies while making changes in line with the new atmosphere.

Referring to Biden’s US targets in the region, Sharifzadeh said: The hypothesis is that the purpose and reason for the US presence in the region is, on the one hand, to incite the Arab countries of the Persian Gulf region against the Islamic Republic of Iran and, on the other hand, the US apparently seeks to resolve the Middle East issues by prioritizing diplomacy through coalition building in order to concentrate its main focus on China.

A member of the editorial board of the Iranian Journal of International Affairs, Sharifzadeh outlined importance of the Middle East region for the United States and stressed: The region, because of its geostrategic location at the crossroads of Europe and Asia, has an outstanding importance for the United States.

Asked why Biden chose Saudi Arabia for a military presence to protect his interests, while announcing his decision to stop arms sales to Saudi Arabia at the beginning of his presence in the White House, removed Ansarollah from the list of terrorist groups and downplayed bin Salman’s role in developments in the region, she said: It seems that the US strategy in the Middle East is to preserve its traditional allies, including Saudi Arabia, and to bring Saudi Arabia into line with its regional policies by raising human rights issues, especially in the Yemen crisis.

The expert believes that the other purpose of the US military presence in the Persian Gulf region, especially Saudi Arabia, is to create dispute between Shiites and Sunnis and increase Iranophobia-, and the US President is trying to challenge Iran’s power and provoke Saudi Arabia to strengthen Arab nationalism.

A member of the editorial board of the Iranian Journal of International Affairs, referring to the point that Saudi Arabia is a rich country in terms of oil resources, said: In the American capitalist system, profit and capital are important, and so Biden, with his presence in a rich country like Saudi Arabia and selling weapons to it, tries to guarantee the economic interests of his country.

Sharifzadeh, stressing that Biden’s United States has placed the strategy of escalating tensions in the Middle East and interfering in the affairs of the region on its agenda, referred to some of the White House’s efforts in this regard. According to Sharifzadeh, US strategies for escalating tensions in the Middle East include: selling arms to the countries in the Middle East and the Persian Gulf, with an emphasis on Iranophobia; using natural resources of the Middle Eastern countries; maintaining the region as a consumer market; supporting allies and maintaining relations with regional allies; consolidating the US power in the region; preventing formation of regional hegemony; protecting oil resources; increasing conflict and proxy war in the region; planning to divide countries in the region by creating terrorist groups and destabilizing the region.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading