Blurred Perspective of Russia-West Relations

2021/11/20 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: After the collapse of the Soviet Union, many in the West thought that the Russians were interested in joining the Western world and would become more like Europeans and Americans, but it soon became clear that centuries of Russian history has given shape to a distinct and unique understanding of the position of that country in the world. Moscow now considers its security zone not the borders of the Russian Federation, but the borders of the Soviet Union, and demands that the United States and Europe accept it. Alireza Thamoudi -Expert on Europe Affairs

In the past two decades, much of the debate in the United States and Europe has been focused on how to deal with Russia and the so-called resumption of relations with that country. The policy of resuming relations in the Obama administration, the EU-Russia modernization partnership, the German Mosberg initiative, or the EU’s proposals for selective engagement with Russia have been among the initiatives to start talks with Russia in recent years.

Challenges between the West and Russia

During Putin’s presidency, Russia has become a centralized state and has returned to its traditional global position. It has also competed with the United States to strengthen its influence in various fields. Despite its economic weakness, Moscow has been able to intervene in various parts of the world and challenge Western interests. Russia’s relations with the West have been peaceful only at two junctures in recent years: first, the events of 9/11 and Russian aid to the United States in the war in Afghanistan; and the second juncture was between 2008-2012 during Medvedev’s presidency and the policy of resumption of relations during the Obama administration, when the West and Russia cooperated in areas such as arms control, Afghanistan and Iran; but with Putin returning to the Kremlin in 2012, tensions between the West and Russia resumed once again. Russia initially accused the West of being the main culprit in the 2012 anti-Putin protests. Granting asylum to Edward Snowden was another important factor in escalating tensions. Meanwhile, the escape of Ukrainian President Yanukovych and the subsequent entry of Russian troops into the Crimean peninsula (a violation of the 1994 Budapest Accord) caused tensions in the relations between the two sides. Since spring of 2014, Russia and Ukraine have been embroiled in a war in Donbas in which more than 14,000 people have lost their lives. Moscow’s involvement in the Syrian crisis has also raised tensions between Russia and the West. Another example of such tensions was the accusation of Russian cyber-interference in the 2016 US presidential election, in which Russia used social media to intensify the polarized US political climate. Russia’s actions against some of its citizens on the European soil or the imprisonment of Alexei Navalny also indicate a significant difference between Russia’s and the West’s perception of human rights issues.

West and Russia trying to undermine each other

In the years of the first decade of the third millennium, Russia sought to restore its position on the world stage by increasing energy prices, economic growth and modernization, and by building powerful state-owned companies worldwide in the field of selling strategic resource, and was using political influence in this regard. However, since the beginning of the second decade of this millennium, there has been a fundamental shift in Moscow’s policies. Given the disappeared hopes for economic modernization and the weakening of Russia’s economy, the path to power through economic growth was eroded, and in fact the path to power recovery through the enhancement of domestic capabilities was replaced by the weakening of geopolitical rivals. Arrests of political opponents, financial support for European populist parties, hybrid warfare and misinformation, and in some cases support for specific political forces, have been among Russia’s policies.

In contrast, Western countries did not seek to weaken Russia in the 1990s and the first decade of the third millennium. Although it was in the interests of Europe and the United States that the Russian Federation not to remain as powerful as in Soviet times, they never wanted a big country like Russia to go bankrupt with nuclear weapons, thus upsetting all geopolitical balances. Although the European Union and Russia even launched the “Partnership for Modernization” program due to the Obama administration’s policy of resuming relations, the Ukraine-Crimea crisis was the end of the resumption strategy. Following such developments, the imposition of economic sanctions aimed at isolating Russia became part of the Western agenda. Western experts warn that mutual weakening strategies between the West and Russia have weakened both sides, and that the rise of populists in the United States and the European Union has undermined the West’s credibility, cohesion and capabilities. On the other hand, Russia’s resources and its economic future have also fallen victim to Moscow’s military and political targets.

Concluding remarks

In recent years, the war in Georgia in 2008, the annexation of Crimea and the start of the Ukraine war in 2014 have shaken Russia’s position as a strategic partner and made Moscow a very important strategic challenge for the West. Russia has now been able to maintain its global credibility due to its traditional advantages of nuclear weapons, geographical size, military might, and permanent membership in the Security Council (despite economic difficulties). Of course, there are also differences among European countries over the type of interaction with Russia. While the historical experiences of the Baltic States and former countries of the Warsaw Pact have raised serious concerns for EU about Russia, larger countries such as France and Germany are seeking economic engagement with Russia.

It can be said that after years of declining relations, the sanctions, diplomatic reprisal and escalation of information war has put relations between the two sides at their lowest level since the end of the Cold War. There is a growing feeling among Russian leaders that the fragile relations between the West and the East have reached an irreversible point, and that Moscow must abandon the hope for reconciliation with the West and look for lasting alternatives; including intensive strengthening of relations with China and establishment of purposeful relations with some European countries and other regions that are interested in doing business with Moscow. It seems that this competition will end only when one side of the story comes to the conclusion that it is losing this endless competition.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading