Prospects of Zionist Regime’s Membership in African Union, Its Consequences

2021/10/30 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Interview: An analyst of Africa affairs, saying that if the scenario of Zionist regime’s membership in the African Union succeeds, African countries will be divided on international issues, noted: Given the positions of some countries and their criticisms, this membership will not be easily achieved and does not seem likely.

Speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Yasser Kanani referred to the decision of the Executive Council of the African Union to consider accepting the Zionist regime as an observer member in the Union at the forthcoming February meeting, as well as several hours of debate among the foreign ministers of the member states in this regard, adding: The countries that oppose this membership, especially Algeria and South Africa, managed the opposition regarding the membership.

Coordination to oppose Zionist observer membership in African Union

Referring to the remarks of the Algerian Foreign Minister, Ramatan Lamara, who had said ‘many countries, especially Algeria, oppose this unfortunate and dangerous decision and support the supreme interest of Africa based on the unity of its peoples,’ he noted: Algeria, and especially South Africa, have good experience in anti-apartheid movements and one of the main supporters of Palestine in Africa is South Africa. Such efforts led 24 African countries to join the opposition to the Zionist regime’s membership in the African Union.

The expert on Africa affairs continued: Moussa Faki Mahamat, the Chairperson of the African Union Commission, followed this decision without consulting the executive board, and in his speech to the members last week, without directly mentioning this issue, underlined the need for attracting new financial partners for the African Union and the structure of executive affairs.

Kanani said: From the day the issue of the membership of the Zionist regime was raised, various countries became active, especially with the centrality of South Africa and Algeria. Such developments and positions show that the Zionist regime still has problems entering the Black Continent, especially the structure of the African Union, which has a legal and coherent structure.

 

Zionist regime’s attempts to enter into main institutions of Africa

Referring to the Zionist regime’s efforts to sign bilateral agreements with African countries and carry out economic projects in those countries, he added: The Zionist regime has a limited presence in some countries and has activated its political representations, especially due to its experience in the field of agriculture and management of drought, has focused on technical models and technical cooperation with some African countries and exchanged experiences and projects.

Saying that the Zionist regime seeks to consolidate and legitimize its presence in Africa, Kanani said:  With the support of the African Union structure, especially the chairperson of the Union Commission, the regime is trying to make this plan a reality and take advantage of more privileges. Therefore, it has undertaken active diplomacy to be present in the main institutions as an observer.

Instability, rift in African Union with Zionist regime’s membership

The analyst of Africa affairs, saying that Kuwait, Jordan, Egypt, Algeria, Yemen, the archipelago of Qamar, Djibouti, Libya, Mauritania, Tunisia, Qatar, Palestine and the Arab League delegation to the African Union Commission in an official document strongly protested the Union’s unilateral action on the membership of the Zionist regime as an observer and called on the African Union to rescind its decision, stating: If the regime’s membership in the African Union is achieved, with regard to the integrity and unity that the Union has shown so far in global crises and international issues, it will be shaken and the pan-African spirit of the Union will be shattered.

Referring to the Algerian Foreign Minister’s remarks that the Zionist regime’s membership in the African Union as an observer in the African Union will cause division and disintegration in the Union, Kanani continued: Countries like Algeria and South Africa that have a correct understanding of global and African developments are trying to maintain this spirit and create a strong front to prevent the Zionist regime from achieving its objective and infiltrating into the Union through the African Union Commission and by giving promise.

Behind the scenes role of international powers

He stressed: Certainly, behind the scenes of this observer membership in the African Union, international powers also play a role; because given their position in Africa and the African Union, they are lobbying and pursuing covert diplomacy on a large scale.

The expert on Africa affairs referred to the recent visit of the Israeli Foreign Minister Yair Lapid to Morocco and his dissatisfaction with Algeria’s role in launching a campaign against Israel’s acceptance to the African Union and said: It seems that the role of the Kingdom of Morocco should be great in this treason and in attempting to make the Zionist regime an observer in the African Union. In this regard, the traditional rivalries that Morocco has with the Algerian government should be considered.

Improbability of Zionist regime’s membership

Kanani stressed: Given the recent developments and positions of African countries, if the scenario of the Zionist regime membership in the African Union succeeds, African countries will be divided on international issues.

At the same time, he said: Given the opposition of countries to the regime’s observer membership in the African Union, such measure will not be easily achieved and does not seem likely. In fact, acceptance of this membership will shake the pan-African spirit in the African Union and will have a negative impact on public opinion and among anti-apartheid activists.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading