Afghanistan crisis; Moscow-Tehran meeting, two harmonious and effective steps

2021/10/26 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Interview: Explaining Russia's approach to Afghanistan at the Moscow meeting on Afghanistan and reviewing its final statement, the former Iranian diplomat stressed the common goals of Iran and Russia regarding Afghanistan and the need for continuous consultations between Russia and Iran.

In an Interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Mohsen Rouhi Sefat, referring to the Moscow meeting with representatives of the Taliban and other countries, including China, Pakistan, Iran and India, stated: Russia has always been looking for initiatives on Afghanistan in recent months; Before the fall of Kabul, this country began to engage with the Taliban for the first time, inviting the Taliban and some Afghan figures to Moscow to try to create a common understanding among Afghans; But with the departure of Ashraf Ghani, these efforts lost their relevance.

He added: Even now, given that the main need of the Taliban is to gain international legitimacy, and the concern of Russia and some neighboring countries is instability and insecurity in Afghanistan and its spread to their borders; An attempt is made to strike a balance between the will of the parties; Thus, Moscow seeks, in cooperation with China and Pakistan, to persuade the Taliban to some extent to seriously fight ISIS by forming an inclusive government and paying attention to human rights issues.

The international analyst cited insecurity in Chechnya and Central Asian countries and the import of narcotics as other concerns of Moscow, saying that given that the United States has withdrawn from Afghanistan and evacuated the scene, this situation may be considered an opportunity for Russia to some extent to increase its influence in Central Asia compared to the past, and to be able to extend its influence to Afghanistan.

 

Lack of understanding of the requirements of governance by the Taliban

Referring to the presence of the Taliban Deputy Prime Minister at the Moscow summit, Rouhi Sefat continued: The Taliban were able to express their positions and try to convince the public opinion of the international community that if they recognize their international legitimacy, they will make the necessary changes; But the Taliban still do not seem to understand the greatness and importance of governance and the sensitivities of governing the country, and they still think they can govern Afghanistan in ethnic and tribal ways.

He added: Since the Taliban has not yet faced the super-crises of various areas in Afghanistan and have not understood how each of these crises can cause them great problems; resisted demands made at the Moscow summit, including the formation of an inclusive government, education and public education, and the observance of human rights standards, arguing that these issues would be resolved in the long run and that reforms were not short-lived.

Rouhi Sefat emphasized: The Taliban is trying to postpone these demands to the future with beautiful words and phrases and is only seeking international legitimacy.

The former Iranian diplomat pointed to the absence of the United States in the Moscow meeting due to what she called “technical issues” and reminded: This action shows that Afghanistan is definitely less important for the United States and the country no longer intends to spend in Afghanistan as before. Moscow was interested in having Americans to be present in that counrty; Because Russia and Afghanistan’s neighbors do not have the necessary capabilities to provide financial assistance to this country.

 

The United States is shirking its responsibility to Afghanistan

He referred to the final statement of the Moscow summit, which stressed that the main burden of international aid to Afghanistan should fall on the countries that have had a military presence in the past 20 years and said: Naturally, the United States has been active in Afghanistan for the past 20 years, and the current situation is the result of its policies and actions in the past. Therefore, part of the responsibility for compensating for these issues lies with the United States and NATO, and absenteeism at this meeting is considered to shirk this responsibility.

Emphasizing the importance and necessity of freeing Afghanistan’s frozen reserves in the United States, Rouhi Sefat continued: “The US approach is very important for Afghanistan and those who want to rule in this country.”

He noted efforts at the Moscow summit to seek the support of 10 countries in the region to send international humanitarian aid to prevent Afghanistan’s economic collapse and stressed the importance of continuing consultations between countries in the region to resolve Afghanistan’s problems. He said: Humanitarian aid is actually a shelter whose effect wears off after a while; but this cooperation can be a platform for building solidarity between countries on Afghanistan. Of course, there are some common views on the issue of Afghanistan between these countries.

 

The importance of the Tehran meeting on Afghanistan

The international affairs analyst stressed the need for cooperation and consultation between Iran and Russia, and pointed to the common goals and interests of Iran and Russia in Afghanistan, adding: “Iran is an active and important player in Afghanistan, can play an effective and constructive role in this regard. The Tehran meeting, which is scheduled to take place on November 26 with the participation of Afghanistan’s neighboring countries, could have much more significant practical effects than the Moscow meeting, given Iran’s role as well as the consultations held in Russia. ”

Rouhi Sefat said: “Certainly, with the coordination between the countries, the Tehran meeting can take a more effective step to solve the problems of the Afghan people and establish stability and security in this country.”

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading