US Failure in Realizing Objectives in Afghanistan

2021/09/05 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Interview: An expert on US affairs commenting on whether Washington’s decision to withdraw its troops from Afghanistan is taking place at a time when the country has achieved its objectives or the decision indicates the ineffectiveness of the US strategy in Afghanistan, said: The US officials had set two targets at the time of the invasion of Afghanistan; the first was the fight against al-Qaeda terrorism and the second was the establishment of peace, stability and democracy in Afghanistan. But now that their forces are leaving Afghanistan, they claim that their mission has only been to eliminate al-Qaeda terrorism, and in this regard, they cite the killing of Osama bin Laden, the leader of that terrorist movement, as evidence to their claim.

Speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Amir Ali Abolfath said: In order to examine the issue, we have to pay attention to whether we consider the American arguments for entering into Afghanistan and make judgment based on it, or what they express when they are leaving the country?

He added: When the Americans wanted to enter Afghanistan and invade the country, in addition to saying that al-Qaeda was responsible for 9/11 incident, they should be punished and justice should be implemented regarding the victims of that terrorist act, they believed at the same time that Afghanistan is in need of peace and security, and people of Afghanistan under the rule of Taliban should be helped.

The Americans had said at that time that because the Afghan people were under pressure, they could not study, human rights were being violated and there was no democracy, so we have to reach out to the Afghan people and help them. Therefore, in addition to 9/11 case, humanitarian issues and democracy were also cited by Washington as reasons for invading Afghanistan.

Referring to the US reasons for withdrawing its troops from Afghanistan he noted: But now that the United States decides to withdraw from Afghanistan, it says we were just looking for al-Qaeda because al-Qaeda attacked us and our objective is to punish the leaders of that terrorist group and implementation of justice. Also, the Americans have now stated that issues such as nationalization, democracy building, human rights and realization of women’s rights have not been among their targets.

The expert stressed: Therefore, if we intend to judge by the reasons for the US entry into Afghanistan, the Americans suffered a heavy defeat, that is to say, except that al-Qaeda was almost eliminated and Osama bin Laden was killed, but other issues such as democracy, national unity, security, and women’s rights were not guaranteed and everything went back to 20 years ago.

Saying that the Taliban have again established their rule over Afghanistan with their own characteristics, Abolfath added: Therefore, it can be said that not only the 2 trillion dollars spent by the US was in vain, but the Americans also betrayed the Afghan people.

According to the expert, US officials are now stressing that al-Qaeda has been punished and that Osama bin Laden has been killed, claiming that they have succeeded and that their mission in Afghanistan is over. While at the beginning of the invasion on that country, they had defined other objectives mentioned for their military intervention, but now they do not talk about it at all that they invaded Afghanistan to help democracy.

He added: Altogether, for whatever reason we look at the military intervention, the Americans spent 2 trillion dollars in Afghanistan, which is too high for a country like Afghanistan (given US interests there).

Abolfath explained: If Washington had spent less money on reconstruction, security building, anti-corruption activities and elimination of public discontent, Afghanistan would not have fallen so quickly and could have survived in the case of the US forces withdrawal.

The expert on US affairs believes that much of the current situation in Afghanistan lies with Washington which, disregard of the need for political, economic and social reconstruction in Afghanistan, has turned its full attention to the war over the years.

Regarding the consequences of the Taliban’s occupation of Afghanistan for the country and regional as well as transregional countries, he said: The Taliban do not have a clear record of governing, dealing with ethnic and minority groups and women, and facing with modern phenomena, and the history of war and assassination of civilians by this movement has not been erased from the minds of the Afghan people.

Meanwhile, he noted: Of course, one has to take into account the fact that after the fall of Kabul, a different picture of the Taliban is emerging compared to the past, but it is not yet clear whether this process is merely a show and is intended to attract the attention of the West, or whether the Taliban have really changed.

The expert on US affairs continued: The crisis will be partially managed if the Taliban continue to follow the current approach, that is to say do not pursue war, elimination of ethnic groups, killing of Shiites and imposing pressure on women, and do not take action against Afghanistan’s neighbors. However, time will tell whether the Taliban will return to the Taliban of previous years or whether they intend to participate in power and be present in it.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading