Russia’s Strategy towards Afghanistan

2021/08/23 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online – Note: The policy that Russia is currently pursuing in Afghanistan is an effort to fill the vacuum created by the US withdrawal from the country by strengthening its presence and influence through political mechanisms and security processes, unlike China, which uses mechanisms of economic, development, and investment programs in Afghanistan’s infrastructure in an effort to fill in the said gap. Hamid Khoshayand – Analyst of International Affairs

Russia’s foreign policy in Afghanistan is divided into two separate periods: 1-The period of the Soviet Union, especially its last 10 years, between 1979 and 1989, when the Soviet Red Army invaded Afghanistan to support the People’s Democratic Government and to fight the Mujahideen. During that period, Russia’s foreign policy toward Afghanistan was based on two theoretical approaches: “ideological” (meaning the realization of the great normative modern power or the great Russian power) and “aggressive realism” (meaning revisionist and aggressive behavior); and 2- The post-Soviet period, especially after the overthrow of the Taliban regime in 2001, when Russia’s macro-foreign policy approaches in Afghanistan changed completely. The nature and approach of Russia’s foreign policy in Afghanistan in that period can be assessed on the basis of two theoretical approaches, “ideological” and “defensive realism” (meaning deterrence and balancing of threatening powers).

Afghanistan’s place in Russia’s foreign policy

Afghanistan has always played a significant role in Russia’s foreign policy and national security doctrines. Although Afghanistan is not one of Russia’s neighbors and does not have a border with Russia, in the eyes of the Russians as a country that is a source of export of terrorism, extremism and drugs on the one hand, and on the other hand, bordering the region close to Russia (Central Asia), it is of particular importance to Moscow, and Kremlin officials have mainly sought to reduce and weaken the threatening waves from Afghanistan.

In other words, Russia’s view of Afghanistan is defined by its view of Central Asia, which for decades has considered the region as its backyard and is sensitive against any destructive actions and spread of insecurity and instability to this region, which was once part of Russia’s geography. The importance of the issue is as such that the Russians have made efforts to prevent spread of Afghanistan threats into the depth of strategy and its overflow to its borders as well as limiting the US influence in Central Asia by building and strengthening regional alliances such as the Collective Security Treaty Organization, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), and other multilateral security, political, and economic arrangements, as well as strengthening their bilateral security ties. Russia’s alignment with the 2001 US-led invasion of Afghanistan, ostensibly to eliminate al-Qaeda and terrorist groups, can also be seen in this context.

Russia and current developments in Afghanistan

Russia’s foreign policy in response to developments in Afghanistan over the past decades to the present day, when the Taliban control large parts of the country, can be assessed from a “geopolitical” perspective. The Kremlin sees the “withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan,” which 1- has “weakened the central government” in Kabul and 2- “strengthened the Taliban” throughout the country, as an “opportunity”. The policy that Russia is currently pursuing in Afghanistan is to try to fill in the gap left by the US withdrawal from the country. Unlike China, which has sought to fill in the gap through economic mechanisms, development programs, and investment in Afghanistan’s infrastructure, Russia seeks to strengthen its presence and influence in Afghanistan in the aftermath of the US withdrawal, mainly through political mechanisms and security processes.

Of course, since the issue of the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan was raised a few years ago, those processes and mechanisms, including contact with the Taliban and some intelligence and political exchanges and even arms supplies, have been seriously on Moscow’s foreign policy agenda which has been exacerbated simultaneously with the intensification of developments in Afghanistan in recent months. Russia has officially outlawed the Taliban as a “terrorist” group since 2003 and has been associated with that group ever since, although its level of support is unknown.

Russia is feeling good about the dismantling of the US and NATO military bases in Afghanistan, but remains concerned about the consequences of the US withdrawal and that the military withdrawal will be replaced by “smart security” presence and influence. More than 2,000 security and intelligence personnel have been stationed at the US Embassy in Kabul in recent weeks. To overcome the existing concerns, the Kremlin seeks to strengthen the processes that lead to the establishment of a “cohesive state” in Afghanistan; a government that can curb terrorism and extremism, especially in the north of the country, which borders Russia’s southern borders, and guarantee Russia’s economic interests, especially in the energy sector. As a rule, this government cannot be the government of Ashraf Ghani, which operates within the framework of American interests. In Moscow’s view, the Taliban is an effective political and security tool for achieving its targets.

Moscow refers to the Taliban as a “politically capable force” that is “really and clearly entitled to power” that has become more moderate over time and its threats to Russia have diminished; therefore, it has the necessary readiness to enter the government and politics in Afghanistan “seriously and officially”. That is why Moscow’s top officials are more assertive about the need to oust Ashraf Ghani’s government in the future without NATO. This is what Zamir Kabulov, Russia’s special envoy for Afghanistan, is emphasizing. Mr. Kabulov has emphasized in recent weeks that a transitional coalition government that includes the Taliban and “a wide range of Pashtuns, Tajiks, Uzbeks and Hazaras” is the only way out of the current stalemate; Afghanistan must form a new coalition government with representatives of all political parties, including the Taliban, and this is the only way out of the current crisis in the country.

But Russia has only one concern for the Taliban, and that is what Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov is referring to. That is, the Taliban’s advance in northern Afghanistan has led to extremist groups such as al-Qaeda invading Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, where they have been secretly organizing; this is an important concern that has alarmed the Russian government.

Concluding remarks

Moscow believes that what is happening in Afghanistan has direct and indirect security implications for the Russian Federation. For the Russians, threats include radical and extremist thoughts and behaviors, anti-Russian sentiments among the Afghan people and elites, largely due to very bad memories of the Soviet occupation, anti-Russian political currents, failure of the nation-state process of nation-building and production and processing of narcotics in Afghanistan’s internal environment seriously threaten Russia’s interests and security. The Kremlin is also particularly sensitive to threats to the strategic depth of Russia, Central Eurasia, in terms of the spread of insecurity and instability in Afghanistan.

To contain those threats, Russia’s policy in Afghanistan includes the following strategies: 1. Expanding its influence, political, economic and security presence in the country through various means, including alienating Afghans from the United States (the people of Afghanistan are now deeply dissatisfied with Washington’s unacceptable record of rebuilding Afghanistan, which has led to a staggering rise in corruption among Afghan official); 2- Repelling anti-security waves with the aim of curbing terrorism in Afghanistan and preventing spread of extremism to Central Asian countries; 3- Expansion of economic activities, including in the energy sector; 4- And finally, strengthening the security indicators in the borders of the Russian Federation and the nearby outside region.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading