loader image

The evolution of the crisis in Relations between Azerbaijan Republic and Armenia

2021/08/17 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Despite the passage of months since the end of the 44-day war between Azerbaijan and Armenia, which began on September 27, 2020 and ended on November 10 with the signing of a tripartite statement by the presidents of Azerbaijan, Russia and the prime minister of Armenia, border clashes between the two sides continued and intensified in recent months; clashes that have resulted in the deaths of the military on both sides, while the two sides accuse each other of violating the peace agreement. Hossein Asgarian – Tehran International Studies and Researc Institute (Abrar)

Cause of tensions

Under the tripartite agreement, the Republic of Azerbaijan recaptured a large part of the territories occupied by Armenian forces during the 1991-1994 war, forcing Armenia to cede the occupied territories. It can be said that Armenia was the main loser in this agreement, which was reflected in the protests in the cities of Armenia and even the capture of the parliament by the protesters. In contrast, Azerbaijan took back several major cities to its territory. It is natural that this great victory will strengthen Baku’s self-confidence and in return will lead to a sense of humiliation and an attempt by Armenia to change the situation; but in the recent tensions, the main difference is over one of the clauses of the trilateral agreement, according to which a corridor should be created to connect Baku to the Nakhchivan region and Turkey. According to this clause of the agreement, Nakhchivan will be connected to Azerbaijan through Armenia and Russian forces will take over the corridor, but Azerbaijan believes that it has not taken any serious steps in implementing this clause and if this corridor is not established, it will even resort to force. Armenia, meanwhile, believes that Azerbaijan is evading the release of Armenian prisoners of war and establishing border lines as part of a trilateral agreement.

In this regard, according to Armenia, the Azerbaijan forces advanced to a depth of 3.53 km of Armenian territory and tried to take control of Lake Sevlich, which the Armenian army prevented from advancing, and border clashes continued to intensify. The importance of the Sevlich border region is that this point is the main center for the construction of a communication road between Baku, Nakhchivan and Turkey. These developments have given rise to some speculation about new tensions in relations between the two countries.

Among other factors, such as the victory of Nikol Pashinyan, as the main person responsible for the defeat in the 44-day war, and in contrast to the self-confidence and efforts of Elham Aliyev to emphasize issues such as the Turkey-Nakhchivan-Baku corridor and attract public opinion and divert public opinion from the losses and casualties of the Republic of Azerbaijan during the 44-day war have led some to speculate about the emergence of serious and new tensions in relations between the two countries which, of course, given the regional situation, the likelihood of serious tensions leading to war seems small, except on the basis of a special event and surprising development. In fact, the consequences of such a possibility for the countries of the region are such that it does not force them to provoke such an event.

Russian achievements

Paying careful attention to the provisions of the tripartite agreement as well as examining the situation on the battlefield, it can be concluded that Russia has entered the scene with an aim of gaining maximum points from all relevant actors, with a specific and purposeful plan and has become a major player in establishing a ceasefire between the two countries. Strengthening the country’s position in the Karabakh region was one of the achievements of this agreement for Moscow. Moscow behaved in such a way that all the actors acknowledged that it was not possible to disrupt the status quo or create a new form of relations in the region without Russia’s presence and will; at the same time, it showed the president of Armenia that his inclination towards the West could have serious consequences for him. At the same time, Moscow was able to deploy its military forces as peacekeepers on the border with Azerbaijan and even a few kilometers inside the country. In the wake of recent developments, Russia has called on the two sides to remain calm and adhere to the terms of the ceasefire agreement. Russia seems to be trying to make the most of the Karabakh crisis. Russia can play with the two countries as long as the crisis between the two sides is tense, especially since there is a pro-Western approach in both countries, and as long as the crisis remains limited, the two sides will need it to maintain balance. In other words, Russia will not harm the existence of limited and controlled tensions between the two countries and, of course, will not allow the tension to rise to a higher level, particularly, when it is facing Turkey to increase its influence in the Caucasus region, which could make Russia more determined to manage this crisis.

Turkey’s attempt for role playing

Turkey was another important player in the conflict. Turkey continued to support Azerbaijan in the 44-day war. Turkey has long sought to play further role in the Caucasus and Central Asia, and the war and its aftermath helped Ankara pursue its entry into the region more quickly. However, in the event of a recent escalation of the crisis, it is likely to play a disruptive role and raise suspicions in Iran and Russia. Especially in recent years, Recep Tayyip Erdogan has been ambitious in intervening in regional affairs and now facing economic problems and confrontation with the West, especially with the Biden administration – on the most recent issue over Biden’s recognition of the Armenian genocide by Turkey.

In general, it can be said that the Karabakh crisis was calmed to some extent by a tripartite agreement and the end of the war between the two countries, but this problem has not been completely resolved and both sides insist on their legitimacy and the crisis and challenge will continue, although it will not lead to a full-blown war – as it did in 2020 – in the current situation.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Germany’s “New Defense Policy Guidelines”: Return of Germanic People to Age of Militarism?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: For the first time in more than a decade, Germany issued its “new defense policy guidelines,” and “Boris Pistorius,” the German Minister of Defense, asked the pillars of his country to be “ready for a war” and “capable of defense.” He has pledged to strengthen the army to become the backbone of European deterrence and collective defense.
Hamideh Safamanesh – International relations researcher

NATO’s Ambiguous Mission in Iraq New Plan for Socio-Cultural Influence

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations professor said that although NATO’s training mission for the Iraqi police forces is carried out in line with preventing ISIS from regaining power, in fact, NATO has decided to develop the scope of its mission in Iraq, noted: NATO, and the United States at its head, is looking for influence in the social body of Arab countries, especially Iraq, to advance its targets while shaping the intellectual formation and organizing the police body against the Resistance.

Consequences, Prospects of Continuation of Ground Operations of Zionist Regime in Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the continuation of the ground operations of the Zionist regime in Gaza and the success of the Hamas resistance forces in crippling their military equipment and inflicting heavy casualties on them, important questions can be raised about the prospect of that military invasion.
Hamid Khoshayand – Expert on regional affairs

France vs. Baku and Ankara in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations university professor stated that Paris is trying not to allow the situation in the Caucasus to progress as desired by the Republic of Azerbaijan and Turkey and hopes the situation can be shaped as much as possible in line with French interests through military assistance, adding: France, after Russia, is the second largest foreign investor in Armenia since 2016. This country is trying to create a rift between Armenia and Russia by strengthening ties with Armenia. France’s military support to Armenia is an important and new development that we are witnessing after the weakening of Russia’s position in Armenia.

Reasons for Ineffectiveness of Riyadh Summit Concerning Expectations of Gazans

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Recently, we witnessed an extraordinary summit of Islamic countries in Riyadh. The Palestinians, especially the people of Gaza, had built hope on the meeting, and it was expected that at the end of it, we would see a collective, serious, and deterrent decision by the Islamic countries. But, unfortunately, such expectations were not met.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University professor

France’s miscalculation to confront the resistance force in Gaza

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A former Iranian diplomat considered the French plan to create an international coalition to fight Hamas as a delusional, imaginary, and unrealistic plan, adding that this plan would increase the military presence of extra-regional forces in the Eastern Mediterranean, intensify military conflicts in the region, expand the war and internationalize it. This situation aggravates instability in the region, and of course, this is the same situation that Western countries benefit from and pursue their interests in.

Al-Aqsa Storm, Defeat of Misconceptions of Arab States about Normalization

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Israeli affairs, saying that the blow the Zionist regime has received from the “Al-Aqsa Storm” operation severely shattered the notion that the regime is an immutable reality that must be dealt with in the region noted: The crimes committed by the Zionist regime in Gaza will remain in the minds of the people of Islamic countries for a long time and will be a serious challenge for normalization.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Germany’s “New Defense Policy Guidelines”: Return of Germanic People to Age of Militarism?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: For the first time in more than a decade, Germany issued its “new defense policy guidelines,” and “Boris Pistorius,” the German Minister of Defense, asked the pillars of his country to be “ready for a war” and “capable of defense.” He has pledged to strengthen the army to become the backbone of European deterrence and collective defense.
Hamideh Safamanesh – International relations researcher

NATO’s Ambiguous Mission in Iraq New Plan for Socio-Cultural Influence

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations professor said that although NATO’s training mission for the Iraqi police forces is carried out in line with preventing ISIS from regaining power, in fact, NATO has decided to develop the scope of its mission in Iraq, noted: NATO, and the United States at its head, is looking for influence in the social body of Arab countries, especially Iraq, to advance its targets while shaping the intellectual formation and organizing the police body against the Resistance.

Consequences, Prospects of Continuation of Ground Operations of Zionist Regime in Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the continuation of the ground operations of the Zionist regime in Gaza and the success of the Hamas resistance forces in crippling their military equipment and inflicting heavy casualties on them, important questions can be raised about the prospect of that military invasion.
Hamid Khoshayand – Expert on regional affairs

France vs. Baku and Ankara in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations university professor stated that Paris is trying not to allow the situation in the Caucasus to progress as desired by the Republic of Azerbaijan and Turkey and hopes the situation can be shaped as much as possible in line with French interests through military assistance, adding: France, after Russia, is the second largest foreign investor in Armenia since 2016. This country is trying to create a rift between Armenia and Russia by strengthening ties with Armenia. France’s military support to Armenia is an important and new development that we are witnessing after the weakening of Russia’s position in Armenia.

Reasons for Ineffectiveness of Riyadh Summit Concerning Expectations of Gazans

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Recently, we witnessed an extraordinary summit of Islamic countries in Riyadh. The Palestinians, especially the people of Gaza, had built hope on the meeting, and it was expected that at the end of it, we would see a collective, serious, and deterrent decision by the Islamic countries. But, unfortunately, such expectations were not met.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University professor

France’s miscalculation to confront the resistance force in Gaza

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A former Iranian diplomat considered the French plan to create an international coalition to fight Hamas as a delusional, imaginary, and unrealistic plan, adding that this plan would increase the military presence of extra-regional forces in the Eastern Mediterranean, intensify military conflicts in the region, expand the war and internationalize it. This situation aggravates instability in the region, and of course, this is the same situation that Western countries benefit from and pursue their interests in.

Al-Aqsa Storm, Defeat of Misconceptions of Arab States about Normalization

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Israeli affairs, saying that the blow the Zionist regime has received from the “Al-Aqsa Storm” operation severely shattered the notion that the regime is an immutable reality that must be dealt with in the region noted: The crimes committed by the Zionist regime in Gaza will remain in the minds of the people of Islamic countries for a long time and will be a serious challenge for normalization.

Loading