Gross Violation of Rights of Indigenous People; International Accountability of the US and Canadian Governments

2021/07/31 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online- Interview An expert on International Law affiliated to the Human Rights Headquarters of the Judicial Power while stating that gross violation of human rights in Canada is evident, he also pointed out the similar measures taken against the indigenous people of the United States and said:” For sure, these files are pursuable for international accountability of the governments of the US and Canada.

Amir Biparvaa in an interview with the site of Strategic Council for Foreign Relations (SCFR) referring to the violation of rights of the indigenous people in Canada and excavation of mass graves in the country said:” the issue of forced disappearance of indigenous people in Canada is quite evident. After years, the remaining of their bodies found in mass graves, and due to gross and blatant violation of human rights, it can be said that the crime against humanity has clearly happened”.

He said the similar investigation of such crimes has been witnessed in the courts of former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. He added the recurrence of gross violation of human rights in Canada is obvious, because the gross violation of the right to live has happened. The right was illegally breached and led to the loss of life of a large number of human beings.

 

Human Rights Violation and Genocide of Indigenous People in the US

The expert of Human Rights Headquarter affiliated to the Judicial Power referred to the letter of one of the leaders of ethnical and religious minorities of Canada addressed to the President of the United States in which he had also protested against the violation of rights of indigenous people of the US and said:” It goes without saying that when the internal wars of America were going on, during the slavery era or even when Anglo-Saxons were migrating to America, such violation of rights had happened against the indigenous people of the US. Indeed, similar and various measures might have been taken to annihilate the indigenous people, but the reasons linked to the issue must be reviewed which according to International Law is normally done within the framework of independent investigating commissions.

While stating that such review might be carried out within various governmental and non-governmental frameworks, Biparvaa explained:” governments are obliged to answer about such human rights violation”.

The expert of Human Rights Headquarter affiliated to the Judicial Power reminded that:” For sure, during 18th to 20th centuries a large number of crimes committed against the indigenous people of not only the United States of America but also the whole continent, which were registered and recorded in history, but the case should be dealt with for governments accountability to see what they did during different periods.

 

Challenges ahead of legal pursuit of violation of rights of the indigenous people of Canada

Among the possible solutions to legally pursue the genocide, he mentioned the initiate proceedings by relatives of victims at magistrate courts of Canada as well as pursuing through the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (widely known as Genocide Convention). In the meantime, he said the international criminal law had accepted the individual accountability. But this is not, at the moment, an easy job to find the survivors of victims. Moreover, the accused are no longer living. According to the International Criminal Court (ICC), when the perpetrator of crime is not living, pursuit and investigation will be ceased accordingly.

Having stated that within the framework of the present International Criminal Justice (ICJ), which by itself, is within the authority of the international criminal court , there is no legal ground to pursue or investigate about the issue, Biparvaa added that International Criminal Justice is qualified to review the issue according to Genocide Convention. But it seems unlikely that the case will lead to any result.

Biparvaa called the denial of Canadian government and the claim that it did not notice the commitment of such genocide as “decisive”, and continued:” international courts are very cautious in dealing with “Genocide” crime”.

International Accountability of the US and Canadian Governments               

He emphasized on the necessity of paying attention to the historical aspects of the genocide aiming at reviewing the performance of Canadian government against it, as well as the ways it follows to evade from her responsibility, and said:” the case was shelved for almost a century. Investigating the issue will not be an easy job for any law firm which deals with international law”.

Biparvaa also called the violation of the rights of indigenous people of the US as reviewable and added:” in terms of criminal pursuit in International Criminal Court (ICC), it must be remembered that the court has no temporal qualification for some crimes. Moreover, the perpetrators of genocide and forced disappearance committed the crimes more than a hundred years ago. As they are not, certainly, living any longer consequently there is not any possibility for their criminal prosecution. But for sure, the files are pursuable in terms of international accountability of the US and Canadian governments.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading