Last Ditch Effort of Zionist Regime against JCPOA Revival

2021/07/12 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online- Once again and coincided with the Vienna talks in which parties are approaching an agreement on Joint Comprehensive Plan Of Action widely known as JCPOA revival, authorities of the Zionist regime have started to raise impediments on its way and make JCPOA revival difficult or impossible. Hassan Haani-Zadeh, Middle-East Analyst

In line with this, the recent visit of Reuven Rivlin, former president of the Zionist regime to the United States and his meeting with President Joe Biden is assessed as futile effort of the authorities of the regime in order to broaden the US supportive umbrella to Israel and raising impediments on the way to revive JCPOA. As we noticed, in the last round of nuclear talks during Barak Obama, the Zionist along with Saudi Arabia authorities spared no effort to make to talks fruitless. Although they, ultimately, did not reach their goal and JCPOA was agreed upon.

Now, it happens again while the former president of the Zionist regime made his trip to Washington only a few days before his tenure of office was finished. But he received a cold shoulder from Joe Biden, the President of the United States. However, it was not the only effort made by the authorities of the Zionist regime. Naftali Benet, the new prime minister of the Zionist regime is also going to pay a visit to the While House and have a meeting with President Joe Biden and coordinate the general policies of the Zionist regime on the region and Iran with him. Although Biden renewed the US commitment to preserve the sustain security of the Zionist regime, but the resultant of reports show that the While House leaders are not satisfied about the policies adopted by the authorities of the Zionist regime in broadening internal crisis of the occupied territories.

Since Joe Biden’s victory on 2020 US presidential election, the least contacts between the authorities of the Zionist regime and the While House leaders were made within the past seven decades; because Biden’s team is strongly unhappy about the adventurism of Likud party in the region. The most pivotal differences between the White House and the authorities of the Zionist regime are the continuation of settlement construction in the occupied territories as well as the Zionist Israeli army attacks and extremist settlers to Sheikh Jarrah region in Eastern Quds. Another issue which was raised in the course of the meeting between the two presidents was the expansion of Iranian influence in the region and approaching views among Iran and 4+1 in Vienna. In the course of the meeting, the former president of the Zionist regime tried once again to encourage Biden to impose sanctions against Iran and to dissuade him to return back to JCPOA. It appears that his effort led to nowhere. Joe Biden’s team considers Trump withdrawal from JCPOA as an unjustifiable act. That’s why they plan for the US return to JCPOA. Although the democrat administration tries to include both other issues to JCPOA talks and make some changes in the timetable therein.

Another pivotal issue in the agenda of talks between the former president of the Zionist regime and the president of the United States was the expansion of Iranian influence among the countries of the axis of resistance, which has led to empowerment of anti-Zionist movements in the region. In the 12-day Gaza war that ultimately led to the victory of Palestinian combatants, the majority of Israeli army commanders believed that Hamas and Islamic Jihad were under the influence of field experiences of martyr Ghassem Soleimani and other field commanders of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

After the Gaza war that led to the defeat of the Zionist regime army, the configuration of the regime was undergone major changes and Benjamin Netanyahu was driven out of the power circle. The Changes created in the power circle and the exit of Likud party from the scene was probably done by a hint from Biden’s team. Unlike the former president Trump, the democrat president of the US has no positive impression towards Israeli extremist parties. Former president Trump was very close to extremist parties of the Zionist regime, in a way that he had to withdraw from JCPOA under the Zionist lobby.

The Regime has faced strong political isolation domestically ever-since extremist parties defeated, because the accumulation of domestic problems as well as military defeat in Gaza had created strong critical conditions for the new cabinet of the Zionist regime. Now, it seems that the new cabinet of the Zionist regime headed by Naftali Bennet has adopted more conservative attitude in comparison with that of the former cabinet of Benjamin Netanyahu. Naftali Bennet tries to iron out the wrinkles between Tel Aviv and Washington and does not act in a way that fans the White House anger. That’s why Knesset the parliament of the Zionist regime elected recently Isaac Herzog with 78 votes out of 120 seats as the eleventh president of Israeli regime. Changes are coupled with an important message.

The message is clear; Israeli governance body has changed according to the new policies of the White House and President Biden himself. The new cabinet will not take any political and field measures without coordination with Joe Biden’s team. Obviously, the changes mean as a kind of coordination between Tel Aviv and Washington, because Joe Biden’s team is not willing to pay high political and international prices for the adventurism of the Zionist regime.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

An Analysis of South Korea’s Response to Trump’s Tariff Policy

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, a new wave of economic protectionism in the form of tariff policies has impacted global trade. One of the first countries targeted by these tariffs was South Korea—a nation whose economy heavily relies on exports, particularly to the American market.

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Objectives of Western Military Support Escalation for the Zionist Regime After the Ceasefire with Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asia affairs expert stated that following the imposition of a ceasefire on the Zionist regime on June 23, 2025, after its military aggression against Iran, reports from Arab sources indicate the arrival of 17 heavy transport aircraft carrying military equipment from the United States and Germany to the Occupied Territories. This move, which the Iraqi media “Naya” describes as part of Western efforts to rebuild the Zionist regime’s military capabilities after heavy losses in the 12-day war with Iran, poses a serious threat to regional peace and Iran’s nuclear negotiations.

Netanyahu’s Tactics to Evade Trial Under Pretext of Security and Regional Developments

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An Israeli regime affairs researcher stated: The Zionist regime media recently announced that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of this regime, has requested a two-week postponement of his trial for security reasons and regional developments. On Sunday, news also emerged that the “Occupied Jerusalem” district court agreed to postpone Netanyahu’s trial by one week. This decision followed the Zionist regime Prime Minister summoning officials from the Foreign Intelligence Service (Mossad) and Military Intelligence Organization (Aman) to a confidential session held at this court to explain the reasons for his request to delay his trial by two weeks.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

An Analysis of South Korea’s Response to Trump’s Tariff Policy

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, a new wave of economic protectionism in the form of tariff policies has impacted global trade. One of the first countries targeted by these tariffs was South Korea—a nation whose economy heavily relies on exports, particularly to the American market.

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Objectives of Western Military Support Escalation for the Zionist Regime After the Ceasefire with Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asia affairs expert stated that following the imposition of a ceasefire on the Zionist regime on June 23, 2025, after its military aggression against Iran, reports from Arab sources indicate the arrival of 17 heavy transport aircraft carrying military equipment from the United States and Germany to the Occupied Territories. This move, which the Iraqi media “Naya” describes as part of Western efforts to rebuild the Zionist regime’s military capabilities after heavy losses in the 12-day war with Iran, poses a serious threat to regional peace and Iran’s nuclear negotiations.

Netanyahu’s Tactics to Evade Trial Under Pretext of Security and Regional Developments

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An Israeli regime affairs researcher stated: The Zionist regime media recently announced that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of this regime, has requested a two-week postponement of his trial for security reasons and regional developments. On Sunday, news also emerged that the “Occupied Jerusalem” district court agreed to postpone Netanyahu’s trial by one week. This decision followed the Zionist regime Prime Minister summoning officials from the Foreign Intelligence Service (Mossad) and Military Intelligence Organization (Aman) to a confidential session held at this court to explain the reasons for his request to delay his trial by two weeks.

Loading
Samir Design Group گروه طراحی سمیر