Reasons for Change in Saudi Attitude towards Syria

2021/05/17 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - An expert on the Middle East affairs commenting on news published by the British Guardian newspaper that the process of normalization of relations between Syria and Saudi Arabia after Eid al-Fitr is possible, said: The rift in the triangle of Netanyahu, Trump and Bin Salman has prompted Saudi leaders to seek to change their regional approaches, especially in troubled areas such as Syria and Yemen.

Davood Ahmadzadeh, speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations noted: Syria has always been of special importance to the countries of the region, especially to Saudi Arabia, which is considered one of the main players. Therefore, after the political unrest in Syria and outbreak of the civil war, the Saudi authorities acted as a supporter and even godfather of the Takfiri and terrorist groups.

Pointing out that the Arab axis, along with the Western-Hebrew axis, played a key role in prolonging the Syrian political crisis and continuation of the conflict, Ahmadzadeh added: At the same time, Saudi Arabia’s competitive approach to Iran in Syria was one of the tense areas that affected both Tehran-Riyadh relations as well as the region.

Further elaborating on this issue, he said: While Iran was trying to prevent collapse of the Syrian political structure through its legitimate political and military support, Saudi Arabia took any measure it could to overthrow Bashar Assad.

According to the expert, the failure of Saudi Arabia and Mohammed bin Salman himself to advance militant goals in the region, especially in Syria, and to stabilize the country politically due to cooperation between Iran and Russia, as well as political meetings on the eve of Kazakhstan, further weakened Saudi Arabia’s position in the region, especially in Syria.

The expert added: In such a situation, by Donald Trump stepping aside in the United States and the coming to power of Joe Biden, we are witnessing some changes in the Middle East, especially in West Asia.

According to Ahmadzadeh, this great failure, that is to say the rift in the previously formed sinister triangle between extremist Zionist leader Benjamin Netanyahu and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and former US President Donald Trump, has prompted Saudi leaders to seek to change their regional approaches, especially in turbulent areas such as Syria and Yemen. At the same time, in recent weeks, we have been witness to bin Salman’s open talk about reconciliation with Iran and serious talks with it in public media interviews.

The expert stressed: Any possibility of dialogue and compromise between Iran and Saudi Arabia could reduce tensions and conflicts in the region, especially in Syria.

Pointing out that Yemen is a vital and strategic area for the Saudis, Ahmadzadeh said: Perhaps in the recent talks between Tehran and Riyadh, this multi-faceted regional equation of lifting the siege and simultaneously announcing a ceasefire in Yemen and reducing tensions and establishing political stability in Syria with participation of regional powers, especially Iran and Saudi Arabia, has been a priority.

According to Ahmadzadeh, another issue that is important for Saudi Arabia at this juncture regarding Syria is the issue of participation in the reconstruction of that country, adding:. Given the economic damage and the need to rebuild Syria’s vital arteries in the post-war period, the need for investment and financial resources is significant. Therefore, the Saudis are preparing to improve relations in negotiations with the Syrian political system to restore their status in the region and economic participation in the reconstruction of the country.

The expert on the Middle East affairs, saying that although this lever of power could be considered as a source of Saudi political influence in the future of the Syrian political structure, added: Nevertheless, perhaps the government of Bashar Assad, if feels confident of the military and political non-interference of Saudi Arabia and its allies, would welcome the assistance and investment of those countries.

Finally, Ahmadzadeh said in the conclusion of his analysis: Given the US administration’s approach to reducing regional conflicts and withdrawing its troops from West Asia and focusing more on East Asian affairs and political and military tensions with China and Russia, it seems that by continuing this process and in the event of multilateral negotiations between the powers involved in regional issues, especially Iran, Saudi Arabia and Turkey as the main members of power in the new Middle East, we will be witness to the reduction of tensions and the beginning of new power equations in the region. Of course, in the current situation, reduction of tensions does not only include Iran and Saudi Arabia, but also Turkey, by revising in its previous policies, has begun the process of negotiating and compromising with its previous rivals, especially Saudi Arabia and Egypt.

He stressed: Although the fluidity of power in the region and the trend of future developments in the field indicate that it is not possible to paint an accurate and clear picture of the upcoming developments, nevertheless it can be said that the current situation in the region, has forced former enemies and rivals to take a new initiative, which is negotiations, to reduce tensions and maintain their relative position in areas of crisis.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading