loader image

Increasing destructive approaches of the Zionist regime in the Middle East

2021/05/09 | political, top news

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: With the arrival of the World Quds Day, the Zionist regime has increased its destructive movements and measures in the Middle East especially against the resistance movement and the Islamic Republic of Iran. Hassan Hanizadeh—expert of Middle East issues

The Zionist regime is one of the supporters of some reactionary Arab states in the region. It has supported them in most of their crimes and murders. This regime has spared no efforts in connection with Iran and killing the nuclear deal. However, with Joe Biden in the White House now and the probable change in the policies of his administration towards Tel Aviv and Riyadh compared to the period of Donald Trump, some concerns have been created for the Zionist regime and Saudi Arabia.

 

To put it in more details, three influential factors are involved in coordination to instigate more instability in the region when it comes to the activities of the resistance movement on the ground. They are Washington, Riyadh and Tel Aviv.

 

In the first place, the influential role of the United States of America should be explored as the main player in regional crises and confrontation with independent states as well as organizing terrorist and Takfiri currents and determining security and military strategies.

 

Attacking Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya, encouraging Saudi Arabia to attack Yemen, overthrowing the Muslim Brotherhood government in Egypt and interfering in the internal affairs of the Arab countries of the Persian Gulf are parts of the regional policies of the United States. However, there two more important tools in the hands of the US in the Middle East without which the US shall not be able to change the military, political and geographical equations of the region. Saudi Arabia as a strategic ally of the United States enjoy financially capabilities and during the past four decades has played a totally destructive role in alignment with the US policies especially within the geography of the resistance movement activities.

 

Most reports suggest that when the Syria crisis began as of March 2011, Saudi Arabia has expended more than 80 billion dollars in financial aid to terrorist groups that are under the US support in Syria and Iraq. Estimations indicate that Saudi Arabia, during six years of oppressive war against the defenseless people of Yemen, has spent more than 350 billion dollars but has failed to accomplish a remarkable achievement and victory in Yemen.

 

Another powerful tool in the hands of the United States in the region for military and security purposes especially against the resistance axis is the Zionist regime which acts in violation of the international law. This regime is backed by the political and international support of the United States and its Western allies and enjoys global impunity of his murders and crimes across the Muslim world. During the past several decades, the Zionist regime has acted in line with the policies and actions of the United States and some Western countries against the resistance movement. The Zionist regime has been heavily involved in helping the Saudi-led coalition against the people of Yemen, strengthening terrorist groups in Iraq, Syria and Lebanon, establishing spying stations in the north of Iraq and striking military centers affiliated with the resistance axis in Syria, Iraq, Palestine and Lebanon.

 

The objective of the United States and Israel is to physically eliminate currents related to the resistance axis, reduce regional influence of Iran, create a gap and difference among Muslim and Arab countries and move towards more control over other parts of the occupied Palestinian territories. During the past days, Palestine parliamentary elections were due to be held. However, the Zionist regime, the United States and Saudi Arabia put pressure on the PLO and its president Mahmoud Abbas– now 16 years beyond his original four-year term, to postpone the 2021 elections due to increasing popularity of Hamas and resistance movement in the occupied lands. Parliamentary and presidential elections in Palestine – the first since 2006 – were scheduled to take place in May and July. If elections were held as planned, Hamas could have gained more seats in the Palestine National Assembly and would come once again to power. Therefore, the Zionist regime, supported politically by the United States and the West, is expanding its destructive and aggressive activities in the region. However, the Israeli public may not allow the leaders of the Zionist regime to engage in more adventure in the region.

 

In the meantime, the change of administration in the White House, the negative views of US democrats about the Likud Party, diminishing destructive role of Saudi Arabia in the region, emergence of gap among political currents in the occupied Palestine and unstable economic conditions of the Zionist regime would definitely reduce the maneuvering power of Israel against the resistance movement. Therefore, it could be concluded that today’s developments of the region would not be preferable to the wishes of the Hebrew-Arabic axis.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

New EU Strategy on Cooperation with the Persian Gulf, Its Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Guest Opinion: Normalization of Iran-Saudi relations with China’s mediation, which is an indication of Beijing’s more significant influence and role in new regional trends in the Middle East, increased speculations about the possibility of changes in the geostrategy of other powers.
Abbas Aslani – Expert on international relations

Foreign Policy Challenges of the New Greek Government

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the holding of the national elections in Greece on May 21, although the winning party announced priorities of its future government to be mainly improvement of the economic situation, the continuation of the national policy in foreign relations, security, and immigration would be most important challenges for this EU and NATO member country. Although the new leaders defend the continuation of the foreign and defense policy, strengthening of the country’s armed forces, creation of solid alliances, and development of the weapons program over the past four years, they differ in the field of energy exploration, the militarization of some islands in the Aegean Sea, and the issue of refugees.
Mahmoud Fazeli – International Affairs analyst

Arming Taiwan, One of the US Pressure Levers against China

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An analyst of international affairs called the provision of various types of US military-armament aid to Taiwan one of the foundations of Washington’ towards that island and said: The Chinese have intelligently realized that the US measures must be accompanied by proportionate reactions to make them fully understand that Beijing will not sit idly by the expansion of US-Taiwan relations and the increasing dispatch of US weapons to Taiwan.

What is the new position of the dollar in the global economy?

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: The confrontation between Americanization and the Chineseization of the world has created a new acting field. While the Chinese side’s efforts to reduce the international power of the dollar and increase the global acceptance of the yuan have an increasing trend, it is not possible to correctly analyze and scenarioize the possible futures of this confrontation and the new arena of acting by relying on emotional and exaggerated reactions, and of course far from scientific neutrality.
Reza Majidzadeh—Researcher of economics

Fate of Afghanistan under Shadow of Taliban-Intl. Community Conflict

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on Afghanistan affairs, criticizing the weak role and performance of the United Nations regarding Afghanistan, emphasized: The difference of views, heterogeneous and different performances of countries regarding Afghanistan, along with the weak role of the United Nations, have completed the cycle of failure and in this situation, with the increasing risk of isolation of the Taliban, their leadership is gaining more power.

Establishing Chinese order in the region is one of the strategic goals of the Islamabad meeting

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on Asian issues considered the tripartite meeting in Islamabad regarding Afghanistan as another Chinese initiative to establish peace and stability in the region by using economic tools, adding that this meeting arose from the security concerns of Pakistan and China concerning the realization of their political and economic interests in Afghanistan.

The strategic importance of resuming relations between Iran and Egypt

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: After the resumption of diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia created a wave of positive developments in the region and encouraged other Persian Gulf countries to resume or strengthen ties with the Islamic Republic of Iran, now the news indicates that Iran and Egypt with the mediation of Iraq are trying to resume diplomatic relations.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University scholar

Strategic Importance of Organizing Legal Acceptance of Afghans in Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Former official in charge of Afghanistan Support Headquarters at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: Iranian people are witnessing the high and unusual presence of Afghan refugees, adding that vigilance is needed concerning their presence in the strategic context of cities, as well as to the possibility of targeted organization and possible use of them against the interests and security of Iran.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

New EU Strategy on Cooperation with the Persian Gulf, Its Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Guest Opinion: Normalization of Iran-Saudi relations with China’s mediation, which is an indication of Beijing’s more significant influence and role in new regional trends in the Middle East, increased speculations about the possibility of changes in the geostrategy of other powers.
Abbas Aslani – Expert on international relations

Foreign Policy Challenges of the New Greek Government

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the holding of the national elections in Greece on May 21, although the winning party announced priorities of its future government to be mainly improvement of the economic situation, the continuation of the national policy in foreign relations, security, and immigration would be most important challenges for this EU and NATO member country. Although the new leaders defend the continuation of the foreign and defense policy, strengthening of the country’s armed forces, creation of solid alliances, and development of the weapons program over the past four years, they differ in the field of energy exploration, the militarization of some islands in the Aegean Sea, and the issue of refugees.
Mahmoud Fazeli – International Affairs analyst

Arming Taiwan, One of the US Pressure Levers against China

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An analyst of international affairs called the provision of various types of US military-armament aid to Taiwan one of the foundations of Washington’ towards that island and said: The Chinese have intelligently realized that the US measures must be accompanied by proportionate reactions to make them fully understand that Beijing will not sit idly by the expansion of US-Taiwan relations and the increasing dispatch of US weapons to Taiwan.

What is the new position of the dollar in the global economy?

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: The confrontation between Americanization and the Chineseization of the world has created a new acting field. While the Chinese side’s efforts to reduce the international power of the dollar and increase the global acceptance of the yuan have an increasing trend, it is not possible to correctly analyze and scenarioize the possible futures of this confrontation and the new arena of acting by relying on emotional and exaggerated reactions, and of course far from scientific neutrality.
Reza Majidzadeh—Researcher of economics

Fate of Afghanistan under Shadow of Taliban-Intl. Community Conflict

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on Afghanistan affairs, criticizing the weak role and performance of the United Nations regarding Afghanistan, emphasized: The difference of views, heterogeneous and different performances of countries regarding Afghanistan, along with the weak role of the United Nations, have completed the cycle of failure and in this situation, with the increasing risk of isolation of the Taliban, their leadership is gaining more power.

Establishing Chinese order in the region is one of the strategic goals of the Islamabad meeting

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on Asian issues considered the tripartite meeting in Islamabad regarding Afghanistan as another Chinese initiative to establish peace and stability in the region by using economic tools, adding that this meeting arose from the security concerns of Pakistan and China concerning the realization of their political and economic interests in Afghanistan.

The strategic importance of resuming relations between Iran and Egypt

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: After the resumption of diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia created a wave of positive developments in the region and encouraged other Persian Gulf countries to resume or strengthen ties with the Islamic Republic of Iran, now the news indicates that Iran and Egypt with the mediation of Iraq are trying to resume diplomatic relations.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University scholar

Strategic Importance of Organizing Legal Acceptance of Afghans in Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Former official in charge of Afghanistan Support Headquarters at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: Iranian people are witnessing the high and unusual presence of Afghan refugees, adding that vigilance is needed concerning their presence in the strategic context of cities, as well as to the possibility of targeted organization and possible use of them against the interests and security of Iran.

Loading