Dimensions, Causes of Tension between Jordan and Zionist Regime

2021/03/27 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - An analyst of Zionist regime’s affairs, referring to Jordan’s concern over the transfer of guardianship of the Palestinian holy sites to Saudi Arabia as a reason for obstructing Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE, said: It seems that the main reason for Netanyahu not going to the UAE has been security and threats that they felt about making the trip.

Ali Abdi, in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, referring to the tension between Jordan and the Zionist regime and the ban on the use of Jordan’s space, stressed: The tension is unprecedented and Jordan’s relations have never been clear of tension due to its neighborhood with the Zionist regime.

Explaining the positions of the two sides after the recent tensions, he added: Some media outlets had reported that when the Crown Prince of Jordan, Hussein bin Abdullah, was planning to visit Jerusalem, the Zionist regime blocked the trip under the pretext that his security team was too large, but the Jordanian Foreign Minister announced that the Al-Aqsa Mosque and the Islamic Endowment of Quds are affiliated to the Jordanian Ministry of Endowments, and that the Israeli regime intended to change the entry schedule, and because the program of worship for Palestinian worshipers was changing, the Crown Prince was not satisfied to create any problem for the Muslims and, therefore, cancelled his pilgrimage.

The expert on West Asia affairs said: Following this move, when Netanyahu decided to fly to the UAE, of course as they claim, Jordan did not allow him to enter its airspace via Dubai, although there is a lot of speculation and controversy about Netanyahu’s cancelled flight, including the illness of his wife Sarah Netanyahu and other issues, especially security issues.

 

Netanyahu’s trip canceled due to security threats

The expert on the Zionist regime’s issues, saying that some analyzes indicated that those issues were more an excuse, noted: Although Netanyahu’s office had pointed out the problems in coordinating the passage of the Prime Minister’s plane over Jordanian airspace to the UAE, it seems that the reason for Netanyahu not going to the UAE was mainly security issue and threats he felt about making the trip. There were messages that if the meeting took place, it could pose a serious security risk to both sides, prompting Netanyahu to cancel the meeting.

Abdi added: Of course, this is the second time that Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE has been postponed under various pretexts, but this time it also showed the tension between Jordan and the Zionist regime again. Of course, Jordan also confirmed that Netanyahu’s plane was not allowed to fly over its skies. We had other similar cases in this regard; like the assassination of Khaled Mashal in 1997, which was carried out by the agents of the Zionist regime without the knowledge of the Jordanian government, and when it was defeated and disgraced, it caused great annoyance for King Hussein, the then King of Jordan. Netanyahu was prime minister at that time when tension arose.

Disputes over annexation of Jordan River Valley

The West Asia analyst continued: What exists now are sharp theoretical differences over the annexation of the Jordan River Valley to occupied Palestinian territory by Netanyahu; an issue that was also agreed upon by the Trump administration and sought to annex the region to the West Bank. The Jordanian government strongly opposes this decision and tried to use its tools as well. For example, it withdrew from the peace process negotiations, and the recent events are not unrelated to the issue of the annoyance of the Jordanian Hashemite government from the annexation of the Jordan River Valley to the occupied territories.

Abdi, meanwhile, referred to some news about the possibility of Netanyahu meeting with bin Salman in the UAE, saying: It was not unlikely that the same thing would happen and bin Salman would be there and have a meeting at the airport.

Jordan concerned about handing over custodianship of Palestinian holy sites to Saudi Arabia

He also pointed to some analyses on Saudi Arabia’s efforts to escalate tensions between Jordan and the Zionist regime with an aim of gaining the privilege of sponsoring Al-Aqsa Mosque, as well as news of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman consulting with Netanyahu to take the guardianship of the Palestinian holy sites from Jordan as other issues criticized by Jordan.

Regarding Jordan’s role in regional developments and its position on the normalization of relations between Arab countries, especially Saudi Arabia, with the Zionist regime, Abdi said: Jordan has never been a key player in the region and there are many reasons, including geopolitical, population and political regime, as well we its severe dependence on  countries like the UAE and Saudi Arabia are noticeable in this regard; because Jordan, like the Arab countries in the Persian Gulf, does not have high oil, gas and income resources.

He continued: This dependence is very influential in decisions and measures, but Jordan has always tried to maintain the balance, but at the same time Jordan has normalized its relations with the Zionist regime and recognized the regime and has an official embassy and cannot oppose the process of normalization with other countries; as is among the leaders, and in the Oslo talks, King Hussein was one of the key figures alongside Hosni Mubarak.

He stressed that what Jordan is currently challenging with the regime is territorial disputes. It has no serious opposition to the regime’s principles and has never had any, Jordan has never been serious in the fight against Israel, because the founder of the Hashemite Jordan, King Hussein’s father and his grandfather had secret relations and negotiations with the Israelis since the establishment of that regime.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading