Biden’s Objectives in Escalating Confrontational Policy with China

2021/03/21 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - The United States began its confrontation with China more explicitly and objectively during the Donald Trump era than the Obama administration; and the Biden administration seems to be pursuing Trump policies, as the United States is well aware that it is now in a good position to compete with China, while China must continue its economic growth and development for at least another two decades to be in a good position to compete. Dr. Tahmoureth Gholami - Expert on the US Affairs

One of the most important and enduring facts in the history of international relations has been the rise and fall of great powers. This means that since the formation of the Westphalian system and the modern state, some great powers have always been able to emerge in the position of the supreme power of the international system and take the place of the previous superior states. The United States emerged as a major power after the World War II, leading and dominating the Western bloc. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, based on all objective criteria, the United States became the greatest power of the international system; that is, in the political, economic and military spheres, there was no power comparable with the United States.

Because American power was global, the sphere of its interest was defined globally; but at least in the last decade, there has been a warning within the United States that China is narrowing its gap with the United States; this means that China is minimizing the power gap between itself and the United States by generating wealth in the economy and turning it into political power. Many analysts believe that if China’s development continues in this direction, it will be able to overtake the United States in 2050 and become the dominant power in the international system.

That is why the United States does not seem to be looking forward to 2050 and is already seeking to define China as its number one challenge.

China is a threat to the United States for the following reasons; first, politically, China’s political and cultural system is different from that of the liberal democracy in the United States. A recent US national security document cited China as promoting an authoritarian political system as opposed to a democratic American political system. Second, in terms of economic indicators, China is expanding its economic influence around the world. This means that China seeks to expand its trade-economic lines around the world through initiatives such as the Silk Road and the One Road-One Belt Initiative. The US administration believes that China, relying on debt diplomacy, seeks to make many countries economically dependent on itself. Third, in terms of military, China is modernizing and expanding its military capabilities. The country has built aircraft carriers, formed a modern and efficient army, and developed strategic missiles, operated in the aircraft industry, and so on. Therefore, in three political, economic and military dimensions, China is clearly a threat to the position of the United States. Hence, since the presidency of Barack Obama, the issue has been raised that the United States should focus on East Asia and specifically the rise of China.

That is why the United States started confronting China more explicitly and objectively under Donald Trump than during the Obama administration, and it seems that the Biden administration is also pursuing Trump policies; because the United States knows well that it is now in a good position to compete with China. While China must continue its economic growth and development for at least another two decades to be in a good position to compete.

Biden administration seeking to contain China

A look at Joe Biden administration’s national security document, released on March 3, 2021, reveals that the United States seeks to contain China by emphasizing rebuilding its domestic capabilities on the one hand and upgrading its network of alliances and coalitions on the other. In the meantime, the position of America’s allies seems to be gaining more importance. The United States is in a better position to contain China by emphasizing rebuilding its domestic capabilities on the one hand and upgrading its network of alliances and coalitions on the other. In the Chinese domestic arena, the United States has also focused on human rights issues in China’s Xinjiang, and Tibet, as well as support for democracy in Hong Kong and Taiwan. China, on the other hand, by relying on a policy of restraint is seeking to buy time in order to delay the process of competing with the United States. In fact, China is like a wrestler who follows the assessment that he needs more time to train and prepare in order to win the tournament. Therefore, in the face of the competitive policies of the United States, China’s response is to avoid confrontation and to pursue a cautious policy. In seeking to adjust its policies, the United States does not seem to be influenced by China’s policy of restraint; because Washington knows very well that the passage of time is to the detriment of that country and therefore should not give China the right time. Thus, given that the United States is explicitly calling on China to compete and fight, an invitation that is not merely verbal and declarative, and that the United States has even resorted to practical action, it seems unlikely that Beijing will continue its policy of restraint and caution. Therefore, in the foreseeable future, the rivalry between the United States and China will intensify, and we will see the gradual lineup of the two countries against each other.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading