Modality of Return to JCPOA; Tough Test for New US Administration

2021/02/07 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - An expert on international affairs believes that the position taken by the new US Secretary of State and White House spokesman that Iran should first return to its obligations in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and then wait for the lifting of the US sanctions will not be accepted by Iran. The modality of the US return to the JCPOA is the test the Biden administration is facing.

Morteza Makki, an expert on international affairs, in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations commented on Biden’s new approach towards the JCPOA and said: The Islamic Republic of Iran, by resisting against the policy of maximum pressure of the United States over the past three years, showed that by no means is willing to accept the US authoritarian policies and if the Democrats really want to return to the JCPOA and revive this agreement, first they should follow the logical and correct path, namely lifting the sanctions and then waiting for Iran to return to its nuclear commitments.

Noting that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in 16 reports had emphasized Iran’s compliance with its nuclear commitments before Trump’s withdrawal from the JCPOA, Makki added: This is an important point for the United States and other parties to the JCPOA that Iran will abide by its obligations under the JCPOA, provided that the other parties comply with their obligations.

The expert continued by stating that it was already predicted that the return of the United States to the JCPOA would not be an easy task and that there were serious obstacles in this regard and noted: Although it was said that if there was a serious and practical will from Joe Biden, he could bring the united States back to the JCPOA and lift sanctions. However, the Democrats and Biden’s foreign and security policy team also have their own political and security considerations, trying to make the most of Trump’s policy of maximum pressure on the Islamic Republic of Iran over the past three years.

He noted that the Republicans and the Democrats have a lot in common in their views on Iran and that there is only a difference in their method and tactics of dealing with Iran, stressing: The Republicans and Trump and Pompeo themselves sought to change the Iranian ruling establishment by pursuing a policy of maximum pressure and setting 12 conditions.

Referring to the policies of the Republicans, he stressed: The Democrats have also pursued their ultimate goal of restraining Iran, and former US President Barack Obama had acknowledged that if he could, he would unfasten the nuts and bolts of Iran’s nuclear program.

Noting that the United States does not have such power, Makki said that is why the country is considering a diplomatic solution to prevent the development and progress of Iran’s nuclear program.

He continued: The talks that started in Oman and led to the JCPOA in Vienna were the result of this view and approach of the Democrats in dealing with Iran.

Emphasizing that the political and security team stationed in the White House today are in fact pursuing the same path of the Obama administration, Makki added: But the political and security situation in the region is very different from the past five years, and the Biden administration, with regard to the changes and developments that the United States has towards its regional allies, such as the Israeli regime and Saudi Arabia, makes effort to return to the JCPOA. For this reason, the Americans are seeking to return to the JCPOA from a top position, and want Iran to return to its obligations under the nuclear deal first and then lift sanctions by Washington.

According to the expert, this is a policy that has not been accepted by the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran at all, and Tehran has emphasized that it is the United States that has left the JCPOA and that Iran is still behind the JCPOA table; so it makes sense that the United States should lift the sanctions first and then wait for Iran’s response to return to its nuclear commitments in GCPOA.

Maki believes that this is not a dispute that cannot be resolved, because, in any case, the parties to the JCPOA and the International Atomic Energy Agency seem to have serious consultations on how to get the United States back to the JCPOA and then fulfill Iran’s commitments to reduce its nuclear program.

In conclusion he pointed to the outlook of the new US Secretary of State towards Iran and the JCPOA and said: The US Secretary of State Antony Blinken is being touted as the diplomat of the diplomats, and he seeks to resolve all obstacles and problems through diplomacy. Blinken’s personality is different from that of Pompeo; the JCPOA is an important testing ground to assess this senior US diplomat on the modality of return to JCPOA and revival of this agreement.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading