Saudi Arabia’s backtrack against Qatar

2021/01/30 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert of geopolitical issues says rapprochement between Qatar and other countries of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council and Saudi Arabia’s backtrack in its primary positions and conditions indicated the failure of Riyadh unilateralism.

Dr. Abdorreza Farajirad told the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations that such a backtrack by Saudi Arabia is strategic as Saudi Arabia is unable to return the conditions to the previous status.

“At the present time, the situation is improving in favor of Qatar and if Saudi Arabia wants to act like the past during Joe Biden’s tenure, Americans would side with Doha.”

“This rapprochement is in direct link with the unfolding developments in the United States. Arab countries such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Bahrain had pinned all their hopes on Donald Trump and Trump reciprocated with his unquestionable support for such Arab states. They were predicting that Donald Trump would be re-elected given the support they had provided to him. In fact, since two months ago when the results of the US presidential elections began to emerge, Arab countries understood that the situation is changing in their disadvantage.”

The senior expert of geopolitical issues went on to say that the political status of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates has become weakened with Biden in the White House as he has serious criticisms of the policies of Riyadh, adding that such criticisms are also leveled at Saudi invasion of Yemen as well as at murders blamed on the Saudi regime, in particular, the slaughter of Jamal Khashoggi the dissident Saudi journalist who was murdered in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul.

As the result of such developments, Bin Salman reached the conclusion that the position of Qatar would be strengthened if relations with Qatar are not repaired. He was also aware of the situation of the Iranian nuclear deal which would ultimately improve in the future and this would also strengthen Qatar as it is in the camp of Iran. Therefore, Riyadh finally decided to move towards the improvement of relations with Doha, Farajirad said.

Saying that Saudi Arabia is aware of the possible US support for Qatar if Saudis continue their previous approach, he said Saudi Arabia is ultimately seeking the improvement and expansion of relations with the member countries of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council so that Washington at least gets in touch with the countries of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council and does not merely put pressure on Saudi Arabia.

Farajirad said under such circumstances, grounds were prepared for talks with Qatar through the mediation of Kuwait and Saudi Arabia dropped it 13 conditions it had set to resume relations with Qatar. Saudi Arabia backtracked on its position towards Qatar.

Asked if Qatar has an upper hand in the developments, he confirmed and said Doha was successful in defeating the Saudi strategy in its relations with Qatar.

Referring to the conditions of Saudi Arabia for resuming relations with Qatar in connection with Iran and Turkey, he said Qatar is highly unlikely to withdraw from its positions towards Iran and Turkey and downgrade its relations with them.

The expert of geopolitical issues further said Qatar is seeking to maintain its good relations with Iran and Turkey, adding that Doha wants to mediate on one hand between Turkey and Saudi Arabia and on the other hand between Iran and Saudi Arabia and has even shown green light.

“In my belief, as Saudi Arabia backtracked on its relations with Qatar, if Doha is able to play its role properly, it can improve in the first hand relations between Saudi Arabia and Turkey more easily. Grounds have been paved for this to happen. In the meantime, if Riyadh feels that Biden wants to return to the nuclear deal, it will definitely adopt a more frank approach towards the settlement of its problems with Iran.”

Farajirad said such conditions would be in favor of Iran.

He added that countries such as Qatar and Oman would no longer want to be the mere and unquestionable follower of Saudi Arabia. In fact, Qatar has succeeded in expanding its geopolitical domain and would not surrender to Saudi Arabia like the past. Oman would also follow the same suit.

Pointing to the status of the United Arab Emirates, Farajirad said Abu Dhabi is not enjoying the past status and tends to consider itself a regional power.

“Therefore, there is presently a special division among the Arab states of the Persian Gulf and I think Saudi Arabia needs to be convinced to face these countries with a relatively equal method for the settlement of this issue.”

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading