loader image

Prospects for Biden’s US Relations with Afghanistan

2021/01/16 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online – An expert on the subcontinent affairs, commenting on the possible policy of Joe Biden towards Afghanistan and peace with the Taliban said: The policy that Joe Biden would adopt towards Afghanistan should not be expected to be seriously different from that of the Trump administration.

Speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Pir Mohammad Mollazehi referred to Joe Biden’s coming to power and Donald Trump’s departure from the White House and its impact on the US policy towards Afghanistan, adding: No doubt, the US policies in many cases in the field of foreign policy would undergo some changes; but we must note that the general policy of the United States is not determined by the President alone, especially with regard to foreign policy, and toward important countries like Afghanistan this issue is dealt with the overall consensus of the administration.

He noted: The reality is that in the US administration, where the presidency is one of the institutions, the Congress, the parties and military commanders, together with the security apparatus, would look into the matter and then propose a policy to the president.

He continued: Therefore, the policy that Joe Biden would adopt towards Afghanistan should not be expected to be seriously different from that of the Trump administration. In fact, Washington’s strategy in this regard would be fixed, but Biden’s tactics would be different from Trump’s.

The expert, elaborating on the most important tactical difference of Biden and Trump said: Biden’s team would probably accept the Taliban as a partner in the power structure and not a full-fledged takeover of power. Because, there are now suspicions that there may have been a behind-the-scenes agreement between the Taliban and the United States to mobilize local radical Islamic forces, who have fought in Iraq and Syria and have experience, in Afghanistan against Russia, China and Iran when they come to power. Forces such as the Ahrar Party in Uzbekistan, the Chechen Movement, the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, and the Islamic Movement of East Turkestan, which seeks to separate Xinjiang from China.

He further continued: These are the ISIS affiliates in the Central Asian region and Afghanistan; therefore there is the suspicion that agreement might have been reached with the Taliban to open the door for those groups to take measures against the interests of Iran, China and Russia.

He believes that in the meantime if Biden’s policy is to engage with Russia and China or even Iran, he will probably reconsider the issue with the Taliban and will not give them a full opportunity for gaining power.

He also believes that Biden’s America, at a more general level, wants to treat China and Russia in such a way that they do not unite or form a different outlook towards the United States. The Democratic president also does not want a new Cold War between the United States and the two countries. For this reason, other ethnic groups such as the Tajiks, Uzbeks and Hazaras will play a more important role in the scene of power despite the Taliban’s expectations.

The expert on the subcontinent affairs noted: Therefore, in this regard, the tactics that Biden will use are different from Trump, but their overall strategy, which is to remain in Afghanistan, will not change and they will maintain at least one or two bases in that country.

Mollazehi stressed: Biden will also try to fairly distribute power between the three main currents in Afghanistan, including Abdullah Abdullah, Ashraf Ghani and the Taliban, and if that happens, there will be a government in Afghanistan in which all factions will have a share in power.

As for the role of Pakistan, he said: At the meantime, Pakistan, which monitors the movements of the Taliban behind the scenes, would encourage them to share the power.

Commenting over the fate of Zalmay Khalilzad, the US negotiator with the Taliban team in Biden’s administration (???), he said: It is possible that Biden will temporarily keep Zalmay Khalilzad in office because of his link to the Taliban, but in the long run, however, Biden will bring his team to work and this team will have different tactics and views and will not act exactly like Trump.

He added: At the same time, it should be remembered that Khalilzad did not succeed as was expected during the Trump presidency and that Afghan President Ashraf Ghani was dissatisfied with the agreement reached with the Taliban.

According to Mollazehi: In an agreement reached between the team represented by Khalilzad with the Taliban, he convinced the Taliban that they could not conquer Kabul and establish the Islamic Emirate through the military means. The US Special Representative for Afghanistan advised the Taliban that they could share power politically and accept democratic mechanisms and participate in it, such as the elections; but to date, this agreement has not yielded a definite result.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Single-State, Iran’s solution to the Palestinian crisis

Strategic Council online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, in an interview with France 24 Español, explained Iran’s approach to the Gaza war and outlined the region’s future after this bitter historical event.

Organizing Immigration Issue, Cause of Escalation of Divergence in EU

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on European affairs stated that the European Union is faced with the challenge of conflict in some different opinions and policies among member countries, which can affect the overall approach to immigration in Europe. She noted that when the member states follow different paths, the principle of solidarity and cooperation of the Union is distorted and can challenge the unity of the Union.

Germany’s “New Defense Policy Guidelines”: Return of Germanic People to Age of Militarism?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: For the first time in more than a decade, Germany issued its “new defense policy guidelines,” and “Boris Pistorius,” the German Minister of Defense, asked the pillars of his country to be “ready for a war” and “capable of defense.” He has pledged to strengthen the army to become the backbone of European deterrence and collective defense.
Hamideh Safamanesh – International relations researcher

NATO’s Ambiguous Mission in Iraq New Plan for Socio-Cultural Influence

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations professor said that although NATO’s training mission for the Iraqi police forces is carried out in line with preventing ISIS from regaining power, in fact, NATO has decided to develop the scope of its mission in Iraq, noted: NATO, and the United States at its head, is looking for influence in the social body of Arab countries, especially Iraq, to advance its targets while shaping the intellectual formation and organizing the police body against the Resistance.

Consequences, Prospects of Continuation of Ground Operations of Zionist Regime in Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the continuation of the ground operations of the Zionist regime in Gaza and the success of the Hamas resistance forces in crippling their military equipment and inflicting heavy casualties on them, important questions can be raised about the prospect of that military invasion.
Hamid Khoshayand – Expert on regional affairs

France vs. Baku and Ankara in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations university professor stated that Paris is trying not to allow the situation in the Caucasus to progress as desired by the Republic of Azerbaijan and Turkey and hopes the situation can be shaped as much as possible in line with French interests through military assistance, adding: France, after Russia, is the second largest foreign investor in Armenia since 2016. This country is trying to create a rift between Armenia and Russia by strengthening ties with Armenia. France’s military support to Armenia is an important and new development that we are witnessing after the weakening of Russia’s position in Armenia.

Reasons for Ineffectiveness of Riyadh Summit Concerning Expectations of Gazans

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Recently, we witnessed an extraordinary summit of Islamic countries in Riyadh. The Palestinians, especially the people of Gaza, had built hope on the meeting, and it was expected that at the end of it, we would see a collective, serious, and deterrent decision by the Islamic countries. But, unfortunately, such expectations were not met.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University professor

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Single-State, Iran’s solution to the Palestinian crisis

Strategic Council online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, in an interview with France 24 Español, explained Iran’s approach to the Gaza war and outlined the region’s future after this bitter historical event.

Organizing Immigration Issue, Cause of Escalation of Divergence in EU

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on European affairs stated that the European Union is faced with the challenge of conflict in some different opinions and policies among member countries, which can affect the overall approach to immigration in Europe. She noted that when the member states follow different paths, the principle of solidarity and cooperation of the Union is distorted and can challenge the unity of the Union.

Germany’s “New Defense Policy Guidelines”: Return of Germanic People to Age of Militarism?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: For the first time in more than a decade, Germany issued its “new defense policy guidelines,” and “Boris Pistorius,” the German Minister of Defense, asked the pillars of his country to be “ready for a war” and “capable of defense.” He has pledged to strengthen the army to become the backbone of European deterrence and collective defense.
Hamideh Safamanesh – International relations researcher

NATO’s Ambiguous Mission in Iraq New Plan for Socio-Cultural Influence

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations professor said that although NATO’s training mission for the Iraqi police forces is carried out in line with preventing ISIS from regaining power, in fact, NATO has decided to develop the scope of its mission in Iraq, noted: NATO, and the United States at its head, is looking for influence in the social body of Arab countries, especially Iraq, to advance its targets while shaping the intellectual formation and organizing the police body against the Resistance.

Consequences, Prospects of Continuation of Ground Operations of Zionist Regime in Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the continuation of the ground operations of the Zionist regime in Gaza and the success of the Hamas resistance forces in crippling their military equipment and inflicting heavy casualties on them, important questions can be raised about the prospect of that military invasion.
Hamid Khoshayand – Expert on regional affairs

France vs. Baku and Ankara in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations university professor stated that Paris is trying not to allow the situation in the Caucasus to progress as desired by the Republic of Azerbaijan and Turkey and hopes the situation can be shaped as much as possible in line with French interests through military assistance, adding: France, after Russia, is the second largest foreign investor in Armenia since 2016. This country is trying to create a rift between Armenia and Russia by strengthening ties with Armenia. France’s military support to Armenia is an important and new development that we are witnessing after the weakening of Russia’s position in Armenia.

Reasons for Ineffectiveness of Riyadh Summit Concerning Expectations of Gazans

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Recently, we witnessed an extraordinary summit of Islamic countries in Riyadh. The Palestinians, especially the people of Gaza, had built hope on the meeting, and it was expected that at the end of it, we would see a collective, serious, and deterrent decision by the Islamic countries. But, unfortunately, such expectations were not met.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University professor

Loading