Strategic partnership of Moscow and Beijing, the outcome of the joint hostility of the US

2021/01/01 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: Editorial—In spite of Washington’s view that considers China and Russia as permanent threats that should be contained and insolated through the instrument of sanctions, Moscow and Beijing, on the other hand, have been pursuing a pragmatic approach based on realism to maximize their cooperation and relations with the West with the aim of neutralizing Washington’s isolation efforts. Dr. Ahmad Vakhshiteh—Associate Professor, Eurasia National University

Russia and China are two transregional powers in the international arena which share 4,200 kilometers of borders. Border disputes among countries are considered normal especially when the joint borders are vast and extended in only 650 kilometers of land and the rest marine borders. However, how are differences between two neighboring powers set aside in view of joint efforts and cooperation?

During the past decade, the international system has been facing the emergence of an economic superpower which has overshadowed the hegemony of the United States. On the other hand, Russia which is experiencing isolation in the years after the collapse of the Soviet Union emerged as a transregional superpower and the presidency of Donald Trump provided Kremlin with the chance to strengthen its position and play a key role in the settlement of regional and international crises; and of course, inter alia, the existence of a common enemy has resulted in the convergence of two oriental powers on various issues.

Moscow and Beijing have been always facing a common threat by the United States and the NATO which has encouraged extensive cooperation among the two permanent members of the Security Council of the United Nations to form alliance and coalition and set up another pole in international arrangements attracting many regional and transregional players under their own oriental doctrine. Even though Russia has been pursuing multilateralism in the international order in the past several years and believes that Washington should admit that it is no more the global hegemony and other emerging powers such as China, Russia and …are playing a decisive role in making decisions on various world problems, many Russian pundits believe that there is now a new bipolar system in the new world order: i.e. the United States and China.

It seems that the foreign policy discourse of the United States in the past decade has focused on two key words of “rivalry” and “hostility” in dealing with Russia and China. In fact, after the re-election of Putin in Russia which coincided with Barack Obama’s term in office, Washington focused on hostility with Moscow and rivalry with Beijing. During the Trump period, both countries were traditionally considered as threats from the viewpoint of the White House. However, the American discourse undergone little changes and Washington’s view to China and Russia was pursued respectively on the basis of hostility and rivalry. In fact, the United States in each of these periods put excessive political pressure and economic sanctions on one and rivalry with the other, conveying the message that it can withdraw from coalition and experience a better climate—an issue which seems would continue during the Biden tenure within the framework of the concept of hostility and animosity in the view of the White House to define its relations with Kremlin. However, on the other hand, Russia believes that Beijing would not pursue ambitions and anxiety despite all the differences between the two countries and therefore this approach by the United States cannot make the relations between Russia and China fragile. For this reason, Moscow and Beijing have defined fundamental strategic cooperation during the past several years and have realized such cooperation—cooperation which is in the areas of wide-ranging economic dealings especially in the energy sector as well as security and military cooperation which led to deepening military ties in the space in view of the shadow of threats by the United States and NATO. The Russians are well aware that if such partnership is shattered, the first outcome would be the isolation of Moscow. Therefore, they made efforts to realize this Russian proverb which says “wherever there is sustainable friendship, things will move smoothly”. We can properly detect such an approach in the exploitation of the Siberia power line by the end of 2019 according to which 38 billion cubic meters of natural gas will be transferred to China on an annual basis until the end of 2025 and the National Chinese Oil Company is going to buy 85 percent of the transferred gas.

In addition to cooperation between the two permanent members of the Security Council of the United Nations, the contribution of Russia and China to technological advances have been also remarkable and it seems that a new window of opportunity has opened in the relations between the two powers as Russian President Putin has named 2020 and 2021 as the year of Russia-China science and technology. This is so much a conversion which, in the words of China’s ambassador to Russia, resulted in the highest level of the strategic partnership between the two countries under the complex international conditions in the aftermath of the outbreak of Covid-19.

In the meantime, in spite of Washington’s view that considers China and Russia as permanent threats that should be contained and insolated through the instrument of sanctions, Moscow and Beijing, on the other hand, have been pursuing a pragmatic approach based on realism to maximize their cooperation and relations with the West with the aim of neutralizing Washington’s isolation efforts.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

An Analysis of the Recent Elections in Turkey

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Turkey’s March 31 local elections, which ended with the opposition’s victory and Erdogan’s party’s defeat, is considered an important “decisive point” in the future of Turkey’s domestic and foreign policy developments.
It determines the fate of several important political issues, in addition to the election of mayors and local managers for the next five years.
Hamid Khosayand – expert on regional issues

The strategy of the Israeli regime to get rid of the defeat in Gaza

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: It has been about six months since the Israeli regime attacked the Gaza Strip in October 2023. In the initial weeks and months of the attack, many analysts believed that the Israeli regime, based on its usual practice in wars after the Palestinian intifada, would agree to a truce and end the war after inflicting multiple casualties and damages.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University professor

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

An Analysis of the Recent Elections in Turkey

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Turkey’s March 31 local elections, which ended with the opposition’s victory and Erdogan’s party’s defeat, is considered an important “decisive point” in the future of Turkey’s domestic and foreign policy developments.
It determines the fate of several important political issues, in addition to the election of mayors and local managers for the next five years.
Hamid Khosayand – expert on regional issues

The strategy of the Israeli regime to get rid of the defeat in Gaza

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: It has been about six months since the Israeli regime attacked the Gaza Strip in October 2023. In the initial weeks and months of the attack, many analysts believed that the Israeli regime, based on its usual practice in wars after the Palestinian intifada, would agree to a truce and end the war after inflicting multiple casualties and damages.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University professor

Loading