The consequences of the US sanctions on Turkey

2020/12/29 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online—Editorial: Due to consciously cooperation with Russian arms company Rosoboronexport and the purchase of the S-400 missile defense systems, Turkey has gone under US sanctions of CAATSA as Washington does not tolerate interaction with Russia in military domains by other countries. The purchase of S-400 missile defense systems by Turkey has endangered the safety of the US military personnel and technology and would provide access for Russia to the armed forces and defense industries of Turkey. The main goal of US sanctions on Turkey is to prevent Russia from reaping huge financial gains and accessing and impacting the NATO defense systems. US Foreign Secretary Mike Pompeo has asked Turkey to resolve the issue of S-400 with long-term cooperation in the defense sector and adapt once again itself with the rules of NATO and the purchase of arms compatible with this military alliance treaty. Mahmoud Fazeli, expert of international issues

While the new US administration is going to the White House soon, Turkey is the most recent victim of the sanctions policy of the Trump America. This would place Biden in a difficult situation. Biden has openly expressed his opposition to Turkey’s use of S-400 missile defense systems. If Biden is to decide about sanctions, he will experience had times with Turkey—a measure which has inflicted a very heavy blow to the traditional relations of Turkey and the US and has made it hard for Ankara to play in the ground of the United States under the Biden administration.

Last year, Ankara bought and activated S-400 missile defense systems in spite of the oppositions from the United States. The US government is apparently worried that batteries used in S-400 system, run by computed, could read the flight information of F-35 fighter jets during war games among the member states of NATO. This would make F-35 fighters vulnerable as they are the main and most modern aircraft of the US and other NATO members. Americans had already expelled Turkey from the joint project of producing F-35 fighters and refused to sell these planes to Ankara due to developments related to the purchase of S-400 missile defense systems.

The US congress has now imposed new sanctions on Turkey and the arms commission of the Congress has announced that such sanctions have been set against Erdogan for his security policies. In line with these sanctions, four directors of this organization have been prohibited from travelling to the US while their assets have been confiscated and American companies have been prevented from dealing with them especially in arms and weapons.

Turkey has focused its attention more to the production of modern weaponry inside its soil and its sale to richer countries. The number of arms manufacturing companies in Turkey is on the rise. Made-in-Turkey drones are now considered as reliable weapons of miracle especially after they were used in Syria, Libya and most recently in Karabakh. The list of the buyers of Turkish drones is getting longer and longer. Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Serbia have expressed interest in purchasing these drones while Pakistan has placed orders to purchase warships from Turkey.

The prohibition of the sale of warfare spare parts by the US to Turkey could disrupt Erdogan’s ambitious objectives. In manufacturing arms and weapons, Turkey remains dependent on importing important parts from abroad as Turkish companies are unable to produce them. Turkey is presently importing the engine of tanks, drones and aircrafts from abroad. US sanctions on arms parts would make it hard for Turkey to import such warfare from other countries especially from Europe.

This is not the first time Turkey is facing US sanctions. Similar sanctions were imposed after the Cyprus peace operation and lasted for three years. After various changes in international conditions, the US resorted against Turkey. In the wake of the occupation of Afghanistan by the former Soviet Union and the victory of the revolution in Iran, the United States re-discovered Turkey and terminated their separation.

Evidence has it that relations between Turkey and the United States would not improve easily. Even if the parties try to arrange a new relation with goodwill under the present conditions, it will take a long time to normalize relations given the severity of this issue. The normalization of relations between Turkey and the United States to the previous levels will be possible only with changing objective conditions. Perhaps Turkey had not properly calculated the establishment of new relations on that date. Under such circumstances, it would be too much optimistic to expect the improvement of relations through negotiations on several issues. Even if Turkey decides to revoke the S-400 system, the US would definitely find some other issues for problem-creating.

Some Erdogan opposition groups claim that he is not accountable for the wrong decisions he has made and he does not provide answers because he simply knows that NATO and partners in the European Union will not treat Turkey like Iran and there is always a route for escape. They show the red lines and remind that Turkey should act on the basis of requirements of alliance. The economy of Turkey has not yet become crippled as the result of these sanctions and Turkey has not yet paid the price for the purchase of S-400. Erdogan believes that sanctions that do not kill Turkey would make it stronger. He considers sanctions as a measure against Turkey’s defensive initiatives and making it dependent on abroad.

If Turkey fails to reconcile with the US and NATO and is unable to activate the S-400, the 2.5 billion dollar cost of purchase of these missile defense systems would turn into a crisis. And if Turkey is completely drawn out of the F-35 program, the damage would exceed nine billion dollars. The total damage to Turkey of miscalculations of Erdogan’s government would be 11.5 billion dollars. It is estimated that these sanctions would damage the Turkey’s defense industries and would impact the chain of supplies.

Erdogan is asking the US administration and the EU governments not to be influenced by the anti-Turkish lobbies and try to resolve issues through negotiation and dialogue.  In his reaction to the US sanctions against Turkey, Erdogan cited a proverb which says “a bad neighbor makes you a homeowner”. He highlighted the activities of the Turkey’s defense industries in building armed and non-armed drones, tanks and other arms and weaponry as the domestication of the defense industries in Turkey has reached 70 percent and after US sanctions, production and manufacture of the defense needs inside Turkey have gain momentum. Turkey considers US Congress sanctions as misguided and an attack to its sovereignty rights.

Erdogan claims that they did not agree with Turkey’s demand in negotiations for the purchase of Patriot systems to transfer its technology to Ankara and therefore he ordered the purchase of S-400. The United States should immediately compensate its past mistakes and lift all sanctions against Turkey. Sanctions have not only targeted Turkey but also the NATO military alliance. We expect the US as our NATO ally to support us in the fight against terrorist groups and stop sanctioning us. While Greece is a member of the European Union, it has bought the S-400 missile defense system but has not gone under sanctions and such double standards are suggestive of biased treatment of Ankara by the United States.

Greece appears pleased of US sanctions on Turkey and considers EU sanctions as an award and instigation for Turkey’s reformists as well as forces inclined to Europe as the European Union remains the shared house of all its member states even despite delays and occasional withdrawals from decisions. The European Union should understand its responsibility to provide security and stability for all its citizens against foreign threats. Greece is hoping that the US and the EU would impose more sanctions on Turkey. The impact of US sanctions would be gradually revealed and the map of EU sanctions against Turkey would expand to include personalities and other institutes. Athens has appreciated Washington’s punishment against the Turkish government for the purchase of S-400 missile defense system and considers as effective the US sanctions and its negative impacts on Turkish performance.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading