The consequences of the US sanctions on Turkey

2020/12/29 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online—Editorial: Due to consciously cooperation with Russian arms company Rosoboronexport and the purchase of the S-400 missile defense systems, Turkey has gone under US sanctions of CAATSA as Washington does not tolerate interaction with Russia in military domains by other countries. The purchase of S-400 missile defense systems by Turkey has endangered the safety of the US military personnel and technology and would provide access for Russia to the armed forces and defense industries of Turkey. The main goal of US sanctions on Turkey is to prevent Russia from reaping huge financial gains and accessing and impacting the NATO defense systems. US Foreign Secretary Mike Pompeo has asked Turkey to resolve the issue of S-400 with long-term cooperation in the defense sector and adapt once again itself with the rules of NATO and the purchase of arms compatible with this military alliance treaty. Mahmoud Fazeli, expert of international issues

While the new US administration is going to the White House soon, Turkey is the most recent victim of the sanctions policy of the Trump America. This would place Biden in a difficult situation. Biden has openly expressed his opposition to Turkey’s use of S-400 missile defense systems. If Biden is to decide about sanctions, he will experience had times with Turkey—a measure which has inflicted a very heavy blow to the traditional relations of Turkey and the US and has made it hard for Ankara to play in the ground of the United States under the Biden administration.

Last year, Ankara bought and activated S-400 missile defense systems in spite of the oppositions from the United States. The US government is apparently worried that batteries used in S-400 system, run by computed, could read the flight information of F-35 fighter jets during war games among the member states of NATO. This would make F-35 fighters vulnerable as they are the main and most modern aircraft of the US and other NATO members. Americans had already expelled Turkey from the joint project of producing F-35 fighters and refused to sell these planes to Ankara due to developments related to the purchase of S-400 missile defense systems.

The US congress has now imposed new sanctions on Turkey and the arms commission of the Congress has announced that such sanctions have been set against Erdogan for his security policies. In line with these sanctions, four directors of this organization have been prohibited from travelling to the US while their assets have been confiscated and American companies have been prevented from dealing with them especially in arms and weapons.

Turkey has focused its attention more to the production of modern weaponry inside its soil and its sale to richer countries. The number of arms manufacturing companies in Turkey is on the rise. Made-in-Turkey drones are now considered as reliable weapons of miracle especially after they were used in Syria, Libya and most recently in Karabakh. The list of the buyers of Turkish drones is getting longer and longer. Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Serbia have expressed interest in purchasing these drones while Pakistan has placed orders to purchase warships from Turkey.

The prohibition of the sale of warfare spare parts by the US to Turkey could disrupt Erdogan’s ambitious objectives. In manufacturing arms and weapons, Turkey remains dependent on importing important parts from abroad as Turkish companies are unable to produce them. Turkey is presently importing the engine of tanks, drones and aircrafts from abroad. US sanctions on arms parts would make it hard for Turkey to import such warfare from other countries especially from Europe.

This is not the first time Turkey is facing US sanctions. Similar sanctions were imposed after the Cyprus peace operation and lasted for three years. After various changes in international conditions, the US resorted against Turkey. In the wake of the occupation of Afghanistan by the former Soviet Union and the victory of the revolution in Iran, the United States re-discovered Turkey and terminated their separation.

Evidence has it that relations between Turkey and the United States would not improve easily. Even if the parties try to arrange a new relation with goodwill under the present conditions, it will take a long time to normalize relations given the severity of this issue. The normalization of relations between Turkey and the United States to the previous levels will be possible only with changing objective conditions. Perhaps Turkey had not properly calculated the establishment of new relations on that date. Under such circumstances, it would be too much optimistic to expect the improvement of relations through negotiations on several issues. Even if Turkey decides to revoke the S-400 system, the US would definitely find some other issues for problem-creating.

Some Erdogan opposition groups claim that he is not accountable for the wrong decisions he has made and he does not provide answers because he simply knows that NATO and partners in the European Union will not treat Turkey like Iran and there is always a route for escape. They show the red lines and remind that Turkey should act on the basis of requirements of alliance. The economy of Turkey has not yet become crippled as the result of these sanctions and Turkey has not yet paid the price for the purchase of S-400. Erdogan believes that sanctions that do not kill Turkey would make it stronger. He considers sanctions as a measure against Turkey’s defensive initiatives and making it dependent on abroad.

If Turkey fails to reconcile with the US and NATO and is unable to activate the S-400, the 2.5 billion dollar cost of purchase of these missile defense systems would turn into a crisis. And if Turkey is completely drawn out of the F-35 program, the damage would exceed nine billion dollars. The total damage to Turkey of miscalculations of Erdogan’s government would be 11.5 billion dollars. It is estimated that these sanctions would damage the Turkey’s defense industries and would impact the chain of supplies.

Erdogan is asking the US administration and the EU governments not to be influenced by the anti-Turkish lobbies and try to resolve issues through negotiation and dialogue.  In his reaction to the US sanctions against Turkey, Erdogan cited a proverb which says “a bad neighbor makes you a homeowner”. He highlighted the activities of the Turkey’s defense industries in building armed and non-armed drones, tanks and other arms and weaponry as the domestication of the defense industries in Turkey has reached 70 percent and after US sanctions, production and manufacture of the defense needs inside Turkey have gain momentum. Turkey considers US Congress sanctions as misguided and an attack to its sovereignty rights.

Erdogan claims that they did not agree with Turkey’s demand in negotiations for the purchase of Patriot systems to transfer its technology to Ankara and therefore he ordered the purchase of S-400. The United States should immediately compensate its past mistakes and lift all sanctions against Turkey. Sanctions have not only targeted Turkey but also the NATO military alliance. We expect the US as our NATO ally to support us in the fight against terrorist groups and stop sanctioning us. While Greece is a member of the European Union, it has bought the S-400 missile defense system but has not gone under sanctions and such double standards are suggestive of biased treatment of Ankara by the United States.

Greece appears pleased of US sanctions on Turkey and considers EU sanctions as an award and instigation for Turkey’s reformists as well as forces inclined to Europe as the European Union remains the shared house of all its member states even despite delays and occasional withdrawals from decisions. The European Union should understand its responsibility to provide security and stability for all its citizens against foreign threats. Greece is hoping that the US and the EU would impose more sanctions on Turkey. The impact of US sanctions would be gradually revealed and the map of EU sanctions against Turkey would expand to include personalities and other institutes. Athens has appreciated Washington’s punishment against the Turkish government for the purchase of S-400 missile defense system and considers as effective the US sanctions and its negative impacts on Turkish performance.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading