Britain’s Reduced Presence in Middle East after Hard Brexit

2020/12/26 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - A faculty member of the School of International Relations said that after a hard Brexit, in the medium and long term we will be witness to a decreased political, military and economic presence of Britain in the Middle East and the Persian Gulf, adding: The United Kingdom will increase its coordination with the United States in the Persian Gulf, while trying to introduce new cards for playing in the region.

Dr. Mehdi Fakheri, in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, stated that with Britain’s no-deal withdrawal from the European Union we will definitely be witness to London’s performance in the Persian Gulf and the Middle East. Britain’s separation from the EU will not be easy and the UK should naturally look for alternative sources of income from anywhere in the world, in any region with any ideology. The British were very much hoping that they could sign a free trade agreement with the United States under Ronald Trump, but this did not happen. After that, they sought to sign a similar agreement with the European Union, but such an understanding was not reached.

Britain Seeking Restoration of Relations with Colonies

The analyst of international developments said: Now London’s effort is to enter into negotiation with some countries. For example, it can be expected that they pursue their former colonies that are within the Commonwealth countries, they also traveled to Africa, but none of those negotiations has reached any conclusion yet; thus, the hope that the British placed with Brexit in commercial interests and economic development has not yet been fulfilled.

Referring to the share of the European Union and major economic hubs in the world trade, Fakheri called Britain’s failure in finding an alternative to the EU as a blow to the position of that country, adding: The collection of small and medium-sized countries cannot provide commercial interests for Britain to the same extent that the EU did; therefore, first of all, it can be said that commercially and economically, Brexit has not been in Britain’s interest so far.

Recalling the seven percent share of the Middle East and Africa in the world trade, the university professor said: Britain’s desire to sign new agreements with the Middle Eastern countries will be welcomed by the countries of the region, which will naturally benefit them if conditions are fair, but cannot have a remarkable impact on Britain’s situation.

Regarding the British military presence in the Persian Gulf after leaving the European Union, he said: Certainly such presence cannot be within the framework of the EU as before. Although their intellectual and ideological vertices are close to each other, Britain will no longer be present in that mechanism.

Sanctions on Iran to Maintain Influence in the Region

Fakheri continued: It seems that considering the historical presence of Britain in the Persian Gulf region since the 17th century and its role in the decision makings of this region, this presence will continue in the same form with the Arab countries of the Persian Gulf, but Britain will increase coordination with the United States and at the same time try to offer new cards to play in the region.

Referring to the measure of the British House of Commons to examine new sanctions against Iran, the university professor added: This action can be considered as one of the policies in which Britain seeks to maintain its influence in the region, and to this end, has resorted to such methods.

Fakheri, meanwhile, said Britain would not lose its overall coordination with the West, but agreements that had previously been easily reached will not be obtained easily. The economic potential of the Middle East and the Persian Gulf region is clear and not at all comparable to that of the European Union or China. It may conclude contracts in this region and even sign a free trade agreement, but the geopolitics of the Persian Gulf and the Middle East are different.

He pointed to the conflict of British interests with some important players in the region, including Iran, Turkey and Russia, and said: Naturally, these countries are not willing to move in line with British policies.

UK’s Reduced Political, Economic Weight in Middle East

The expert on international affairs added: In the short term and in the economic sphere, we will be witness to the British weight loss in the Middle East; but in the political dimension and in the short term, because of the previous relations it had in the region, I think at least it will try to show off its presence in the Middle East and the Persian Gulf, and therefore will take steps to coordinate with international alliances and coalitions so that it would not be considered as being absent in the international activities in the region.

Fakheri continued: But in the medium and long term, we will be witness to the decline in the field of political and military presence in the Middle East and the Persian Gulf; therefore, it seems that either in political-security dimension or economically-commercially, the British power and might in general and, of course in this region, will take distance compared to the time it was an active member of the Union and will pay the price for leaving the EU.

He stressed: As the geo-economy of the world has changed, its geopolitics is changing as well. On the other hand, because of this change in circumstances, Britain’s hands will not be so open in the developing countries; therefore, if Britain can adapt to the new conditions, it can, as a rule, continue its former condition; however, given the mechanism in the international system and the context and structure of the British government, this does not seem to be easily done in a short period of time.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Redefining Diplomacy in the Digital Age

Strategic Council Online– Opinion: From the past to the present, there has been a close relationship between technology and international relations. From the introduction of the steam engine to the emergence of the telephone and radio, significant milestones were achieved that enabled faster and more direct communication, reducing the need for intermediaries and diplomatic bureaucracy. The development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) systems also have the potential to transform various aspects of human life, much like climate change did decades ago in the international system. The reason AI impacts the international system, particularly in diplomacy, is that politics and political issues are among the most complex human behaviors, and this complexity reaches its peak in the international arena.

Iran’s Role in the New World Order

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs analyst stated that the contemporary world is transitioning toward a multipolar order in which major powers such as the United States, China, and Russia are engaged in a complex competition to preserve or expand their global influence. In this context, Iran, as a key player in the region and the Islamic world with significant strategic capabilities—including membership in BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)—can leverage these developments to strengthen its position.

An Analysis of South Korea’s Response to Trump’s Tariff Policy

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, a new wave of economic protectionism in the form of tariff policies has impacted global trade. One of the first countries targeted by these tariffs was South Korea—a nation whose economy heavily relies on exports, particularly to the American market.

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Redefining Diplomacy in the Digital Age

Strategic Council Online– Opinion: From the past to the present, there has been a close relationship between technology and international relations. From the introduction of the steam engine to the emergence of the telephone and radio, significant milestones were achieved that enabled faster and more direct communication, reducing the need for intermediaries and diplomatic bureaucracy. The development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) systems also have the potential to transform various aspects of human life, much like climate change did decades ago in the international system. The reason AI impacts the international system, particularly in diplomacy, is that politics and political issues are among the most complex human behaviors, and this complexity reaches its peak in the international arena.

Iran’s Role in the New World Order

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs analyst stated that the contemporary world is transitioning toward a multipolar order in which major powers such as the United States, China, and Russia are engaged in a complex competition to preserve or expand their global influence. In this context, Iran, as a key player in the region and the Islamic world with significant strategic capabilities—including membership in BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)—can leverage these developments to strengthen its position.

An Analysis of South Korea’s Response to Trump’s Tariff Policy

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, a new wave of economic protectionism in the form of tariff policies has impacted global trade. One of the first countries targeted by these tariffs was South Korea—a nation whose economy heavily relies on exports, particularly to the American market.

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Loading
Samir Design Group گروه طراحی سمیر