Iran’s Prominent & Undeniable Role in the Afghan Peace Process

2020/10/27 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Despite the efforts of Trump's foreign policy team in Afghanistan to ignore Iran's role in the peace process, the presence of Dr Abdullah Abdullah in Tehran showed that advancing the peace process is not possible without the cooperation of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Seyed Mustafa Hashemi - Expert on Afghanistan

The security situation in Afghanistan has deteriorated since the US-Taliban peace agreement. The release of more than 5,000 Taliban prisoners from the Afghan government jails has changed the country’s war situation in favour of the Taliban. Contrary to public expectations and assumptions, in recent months since the signing of the Taliban-US peace agreement, the number of Taliban attacks has not only not decreased compared to the past, but also increased quantitatively and qualitatively, with a rise in the number of Taliban attacks and casualties.

The Taliban overnight attacks on provincial capitals and attacks on positions of government forces and the Afghan army, and the seizure of the outskirts of cities and provinces, have intensified the security atmosphere and spread unrest in Afghanistan. In addition to the insecure climate in Afghanistan, the country’s domestic political situation suffers from instability. Diversity of opinions and differences in approach between leaders of political currents and negative competition within the government has led to divergence of political and social forces within Afghanistan.
Differences in the interests of national, regional and international actors have become another factor in the loss of political stability in Afghanistan. Trump’s stance on the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan and the dispute between the White House and the Pentagon over how to pull out troops from Afghanistan have further exacerbated the internal turmoil in Afghanistan. The cautious activity of other countries whose forces are present in Afghanistan under the NATO along with the American forces has not had much effect on creating stability and calm in Afghanistan, and the internal situation is deteriorating day by day.

 

Following the signing of a peace agreement with US envoy on Afghanistan Zalmay Khalilzad, the Taliban have stepped up their diplomatic contacts and sought to re-emerge through ongoing political consultations. The presence of Taliban leaders in the media, interviews with foreign news agencies, ongoing cyberspace activities, and the announcement of official positions by a spokesman for the Taliban’s political office in Doha are also part of the group’s media activities to present a different face of the Taliban in international public opinion.

Along with media activities, the Taliban’s field activities have increased dramatically in recent months. The Taliban leaders, while adhering to the terms of the peace agreement with the United States, have refrained from attacking US targets for the past eight months, with US military casualties in Afghanistan falling sharply to almost zero, according to official figures. The US-led invasion of Afghanistan is unprecedented, but the Taliban’s attacks on Afghan forces have increased exponentially, and the number of Afghan military and civilian casualties has reached a new high since the signing of the agreement with the United States.

As insecurity escalated and instability spread in Afghanistan, inter-Afghan talks finally resumed in September with a series of pauses in the presence of senior foreign officials from some European and Asian countries and the US Secretary of State in Doha, Qatar. From the beginning of the inter-Afghan talks, Afghan affairs experts predicted that the talks would last only until the US election, but few predicted that the talks would reach a stalemate in the first round.

The Taliban’s lack of flexibility in negotiations and the Afghan government’s red lines during the talks led to Khalilzad’s efforts coming to a standstill much sooner than he had anticipated, and the situation became difficult for him. Khalilzad, who has been trying to bring peace to Afghanistan since the beginning of the Doha process by managing the situation and applying a policy of eliminating or giving prominence to the players, has hit a strong wall at this stage. One of Khalilzad’s most important actions during the Doha talks was to exclude the Afghan government from the Doha talks.

This action of Khalilzad, which was met with dissatisfaction from the Afghan government, has prompted the Kabul government to rebuild and revitalize itself and play an independent role in the peace process at this stage of the negotiations. The Afghan government, which had been hit by a crisis of legitimacy since the low light presidential election and the division of the political forces had damaged its international credibility, is now seeking to enter the peace talks and manage the Afghan peace process by shaping regional dialogue and gaining the support of neighbouring countries.

In this regard, Dr Abdullah Abdullah, head of the newly established High Reconciliation Council, made his third regional trip to Tehran. During his stay, he met with senior officials of the Islamic Republic of Iran to discuss the latest developments in Afghanistan and the region, and was closely acquainted with the IRI’s position on supporting the Afghan peace process. Among the principled positions of the IRI in support the of the peace process are issues such as the peace process in coordination with the Afghan government, the need to preserve the achievements of the Bonn Summit and the political structure of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan and the devastating consequences of forming an interim government in Afghanistan.

Consultations on the fight against drugs, the fight against terrorism and extremism, the organization of refugees, the flow of water into Iran and the establishment of a joint Iranian-Afghan economic commission were other issues discussed during Dr Abdullah Abdullah’s two-day visit.
Dr Abdullah Abdullah’s Tehran visit and consultations with senior officials of the Islamic Republic of Iran have some points that can be very important for the government of Afghanistan. While senior Afghan officials have long been embroiled in internal strife and lost the opportunity to consult with officials from other countries, now in the capacity of representatives of the educated nation of Afghanistan they hold talks and consultations with senior officials of the Islamic Republic of Iran and by gaining Tehran’s support participate in the peace talks.    Another message of Dr Abdullah Abdullah’s visit to Tehran that can be mentioned is the regional role and position of Iran. Despite the efforts of Trump’s foreign policy team in Afghanistan to ignore Iran’s role in the peace process, Dr Abdullah’s presence in Tehran showed that the peace process is not possible without the cooperation of the Islamic Republic of Iran and any actor who wants to ignore the role and interests of the Islamic Republic in Afghanistan will fail to achieve its goals.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading