Iranophobia; Zionist Regime’s Leverage to Deceive, Attract Arab Governments

2020/09/08 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - If the Zionist regime's relations with the Arab world improve, Iran's relations with the Arab states will be destroyed, and if Iran's relations with the Arabs improve, Tel Aviv’s relations with the Arab capitals will be strained; In this case, the Arab states will return to their traditional policy that the Israeli regime is the enemy of the Arabs and the Palestinians. Qasem Mohabeli - Middle East Affairs Expert

The Supreme Leader recently stressed in reaction to the agreement between the UAE and the Zionist regime that the Emirates had betrayed the Islamic world, the Arab nations, the countries of the region and Palestine. According to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, of course, this betrayal will not last long, but this stigma will remain on them.

“They opened the door for the Zionists to enter the region, they forget the issue of Palestine which is the question of usurping a country and normalized their relations,” the Supreme Leader continued. He also expressed hope that the Emirati people would wake up soon and realize what they have done.

Given the Supreme Leader’s statement, the question arises as to how the UAE will reverse its decision on the normalization of relations with the Zionist regime.

Regarding the recent actions of the UAE, the Israeli regime, the United States and other Persian Gulf Arab states it should be noted that they have long been in a process that, according to the theory of Iranophobia, try to pretend that the main threat to the Arab world is not Israel but the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Accordingly, this process has started with the management of the Americans, and the countries of the Persian Gulf, especially the smaller states, which are more vulnerable and have a greater sense of fear, are more willing to cooperate in this project. Of course, it should be emphasized that this is not a new trend, and neighbours such as Turkey and the Republic of Azerbaijan have already established warm diplomatic relations with Israel. The Persian Gulf states used to have relations with Israel, but they did not make it public and it was informal, but today the UAE has formalized these relations under the American Iranophobia project and the launch of a coalition in the region against the Islamic Republic.

With these interpretations, it seems that the UAE and other countries will retreat from this trend when the trend of Iranophobia in the region disappears.

In fact, if the problems of Iran and countries like Saudi Arabia or the UAE are resolved, we can see the Israeli regime move away from the region. Therefore, it is an inverse proportion that if Israel’s relations with the Arab world improve, Iran’s relations with the Arabs will be tense, and if Iran’s relations with the Arabs improve, the relations between Israel and the Arab capitals will be strained. In this case, the Arab countries will return to their traditional policy that the Israeli regime is the enemy of the Arabs and the Palestinians.

The question now is to what extent this Arab approach is effective in opening the gate for Israel to enter the region and be present there or ignore the problems of the Palestinians. In this regard, it should be said that since the 1980s, when Shimon Peres wrote a new book on the Middle East, he has raised the issue that territorial expansion is not of paramount importance to Israel, but Israel should expand and normalize relations, especially economic relations with the Arab world to become a superior power in the region. Therefore, he proposed the theory of “land for peace.”

Thus, Israel is now trying to establish itself as the region’s dominant economic power, and this is causing more and more Palestinian rights to be violated. We saw that with the outbreak of differences in the Arab world and the Islamic world, the Israelis had the opportunity to declare Jerusalem the capital of Israel with the help of the United States which moved its embassy there. They also wanted to recognize the annexation of the Golan Heights and annex part of the West Bank to Israel under the Deal of the Century.

In such a situation, the Islamic Republic of Iran must try to somehow stop the Arab Iranophobia fueled by the United States and Israel. Finally, Trump is pursuing such a policy at this time in order to attract the attention of the Zionist lobby in the upcoming presidential election.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading