Expanse of US-China Confrontations and Tensions

2020/07/28 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - The US-China confrontation covers a wide range of issues, including trade and economy, security and military, and political and human rights issues. Seyed Reza Mirtaher - Expert in Military and Strategic Issues

US-China relations have fluctuated sharply under Donald Trump; although initially the nature of the tensions between Beijing and Washington was largely commercial and economic, Trump claimed that China had exploited US technology, skills, and knowledge legally and illegally for decades, and had greatly improved its industry. Washington also believes that with the establishment of many high-tech American factories in China, such as the Apple product plant, the Chinese have actually used US facilities and capital for free, and the trade balance between China and the United States has shifted in China’s favor. The United States says the situation needs to change and get balanced.

Over the past year or two, however, the two countries’ differences have focused more on security, political and human rights issues. In terms of security, the expansion of Beijing’s naval activities in the South China Sea, including the construction of artificial islands and claims to the sea areas around the islands, as well as the launch of an air warning zone, have prompted Westerners, especially the United States, the British and the Australians to dispatch their warships and military aircraft planes to these marine areas as well as the airspace claimed by China. The purpose of such actions by Western countries is to breach China’s claims to these areas.

The Chinese, on the other hand, sought to increase their offensive prowess and power. So in recent months we have seen a sort of lineup between Chinese and American and British ships. The latest development was that the British sent an aircraft carrier to the area, which provoked Beijing reaction. The United States, along with the United Kingdom, also used human rights as an excuse, especially the adoption of the National Security Act on Hong Kong, in which Washington revoked the special trade concessions granted to Hong Kong and the United Kingdom violated the extradition law with Hong Kong. These issues were followed by protests from China. The West intends to react to Beijing’s attempt to seize control of Hong Kong 100 percent and to silence any protests in the country over the full annexation of this important world trade zone to mainland China. These reactions range from diplomatic protests to the imposition of various trade sanctions and sanctions on Chinese government officials in the region.

Meanwhile, the US Congress has added to the allegations that China has been punished in connection with accusations of human rights abuses in the Xinjiang region and the repression of Uighur Muslims in the region. In this regard, it was recently reported that 11 Chinese companies have been sanctioned. The US sanctions have in some cases been met with retaliation from the Chinese, including some sanctions against Washington, which has exacerbated tensions. The actions could be the result of Beijing’s aggressive approach to Trump’s unilateral actions. As in the military field, the Chinese have strengthened their positions in areas of tension with the United States.

Taken together, these issues show that the US-China confrontation covers a wide range of trade and economic issues, with security and military issues in the middle and political and human rights issues at the bottom. .

Thus, tensions between Beijing and Washington are expected to intensify in the future; as explicitly mentioned in the US National Security Strategy document in December 2017, China has been described as a revisionist power, which intensifies the confrontation between the two countries in various areas, thus perhaps one of the areas of conflict in the coming decades of the 21st century will be Asia and the Pacific.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Russia’s Nuclear Doctrine on the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that Russia’s threat to use nuclear weapons in the Ukraine war comes with a “deterrence” approach because the Russians currently have no ground for using nuclear weapons.

Zionist Regime’s Use of Artificial Intelligence in Gaza War and Its Consequences

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although artificial intelligence has important capabilities to improve and increase the level of efficiency and productivity in various human fields, including medicine, rapid diagnosis of diseases, progress in the field of treatment, industries, transportation, and education, it is an effective auxiliary tool to reduce damages. Natural disasters, etc., can bring outstanding achievements to human society. Still, this technology, which is a great blessing, has been used by the Zionist regime, especially in the Gaza war, to “advance non-conventional goals.”

Netanyahu’s Goals of Escalating Tensions with Lebanon’s Hezbollah

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An international affairs expert said: The situation of Netanyahu and the Likud Party has improved somewhat compared to the early months of the October 7 war, and it can be assumed that Netanyahu’s actions in Gaza, Lebanon, and the West Bank will not end soon, so much so that he will not allow a ceasefire to take place.

“New Order” According to the Zionist Regime?!

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime has announced that the codename of the assassination operation of Martyr Seyed Hassan Nasrallah was “New Order.” What might this designation mean, and why should the international community be concerned about it?

Implications of UN Passing Resolution against the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: Recently, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution supported by the majority of its members, calling for the end of the occupation of Palestinian territories within the next twelve months. This resolution was approved with 124 votes in favor, 14 against, and 43 other countries abstaining. In this resolution, the Israeli regime is asked to pay compensation for the damage and suffering inflicted on the Palestinian people during the occupation.

Change in Europe’s Political Approach to the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Ukraine’s attack on the Kursk region and seizing part of Russian territory is a turning point in the two-and-a-half-year war between Russia and Ukraine. In a full-scale psychological war, the United States and some European governments claimed that Iran was sending ballistic missiles to Russia. The claim aimed at putting pressure on Tehran and, in the meantime, justify arming Ukraine with long-range missiles from the United States and Europe. This is even though the Islamic Republic of Iran has clearly stated that it has not provided Russia with any missiles.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Russia’s Nuclear Doctrine on the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that Russia’s threat to use nuclear weapons in the Ukraine war comes with a “deterrence” approach because the Russians currently have no ground for using nuclear weapons.

Zionist Regime’s Use of Artificial Intelligence in Gaza War and Its Consequences

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although artificial intelligence has important capabilities to improve and increase the level of efficiency and productivity in various human fields, including medicine, rapid diagnosis of diseases, progress in the field of treatment, industries, transportation, and education, it is an effective auxiliary tool to reduce damages. Natural disasters, etc., can bring outstanding achievements to human society. Still, this technology, which is a great blessing, has been used by the Zionist regime, especially in the Gaza war, to “advance non-conventional goals.”

Netanyahu’s Goals of Escalating Tensions with Lebanon’s Hezbollah

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An international affairs expert said: The situation of Netanyahu and the Likud Party has improved somewhat compared to the early months of the October 7 war, and it can be assumed that Netanyahu’s actions in Gaza, Lebanon, and the West Bank will not end soon, so much so that he will not allow a ceasefire to take place.

“New Order” According to the Zionist Regime?!

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime has announced that the codename of the assassination operation of Martyr Seyed Hassan Nasrallah was “New Order.” What might this designation mean, and why should the international community be concerned about it?

Implications of UN Passing Resolution against the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: Recently, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution supported by the majority of its members, calling for the end of the occupation of Palestinian territories within the next twelve months. This resolution was approved with 124 votes in favor, 14 against, and 43 other countries abstaining. In this resolution, the Israeli regime is asked to pay compensation for the damage and suffering inflicted on the Palestinian people during the occupation.

Change in Europe’s Political Approach to the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Ukraine’s attack on the Kursk region and seizing part of Russian territory is a turning point in the two-and-a-half-year war between Russia and Ukraine. In a full-scale psychological war, the United States and some European governments claimed that Iran was sending ballistic missiles to Russia. The claim aimed at putting pressure on Tehran and, in the meantime, justify arming Ukraine with long-range missiles from the United States and Europe. This is even though the Islamic Republic of Iran has clearly stated that it has not provided Russia with any missiles.

Loading