loader image

Pompeo’s Failure to Advance Israel’s Anti-Iran Policies

2020/07/27 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - After Donald Trump realized that he should not enter the Zionist regime's game of military action against Iran, the regime's coordination with US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to intensify anti-Iranian actions has increased. Dr. Seyed Jalal Sadatian - Analyst of Political and International Issues

With the start of the presidential election campaign in 2016, Donald Trump chanted slogans and programs that were most pleasing to the Zionist regime. This prompted the AIPAC, the Zionist lobby in the United States, to promote and support Trump. On the other hand, Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law, was sitting next to him, telling him everything Netanyahu wanted. All this comes at a time when Israeli officials during the presidency of Barack Obama were not able to implement some of their intended policies, especially in dealing with Iran; but with Trump winning the US presidential race, we saw him recognize Jerusalem as the capital of the Zionist regime, which was against the Security Council resolutions. Also, contrary to the provisions of the Oslo Peace Pact, in which the Zionist regime is committed to non-settlement, Trump has in fact strengthened the position of the Zionist regime by recognizing some of the Israeli occupation.

This trend became more apparent after Mike Pompeo came to the State Department. Pompeo, backed by Kouchner and the Zionist lobby, has become a major supporter of the Zionist regime’s demands in the US foreign policy apparatus, including the issue of Iranophobia and confrontation with Iran. As he is practically advancing belligerent policies against Iran with the behind-the-scene support of the Zionist regime. On the other hand, the Zionist regime, which seeks to attract the Americans in order to unite against Iran, is well aware that it cannot achieve its goals alone in this matter. Therefore, behind the scene, they have coordinated with Pompeo to narrow the circle of pressure on Iran and finally plan the war.

 

 

 

Pompeo’s Failure to Push Trump into Swamp of Military Confrontation with Iran

The coordination between the Zionist regime and Pompeo to intensify anti-Iranian actions increased when Trump, who had initially aligned himself with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to pave the way for a war with Iran, gradually realized that he should not enter the game. In fact, Trump, who is only four months away from the US presidential election in November, speculates that it is not possible to set up the puzzle of enmity with Iran in the short term to win the citizens’ vote and turn himself into a hero or would not produce his desired outcome. That is why we see today that Pompeo, along with Netanyahu, has taken over the implementation of belligerent policies in the White House.

In fact, the US Secretary of State, a CIA figure, has been trying to persuade Trump to get deeply involved in the issue of extremism in security issues, including Iran, but he has not succeeded. Therefore, in recent months, he has shown that while inciting Trump, he is preparing his political games against Tehran, which, of course, originate from the policy of the Zionist regime.

In fact, in recent years, the Zionist regime has felt threatened by Iran’s movements in Syria, Iraq and Lebanon, and has repeatedly heard the slogan from Iran that “the Zionist regime will be removed from the world map.” On the other hand, this regime, which failed to pursue its policies towards Iran during the presidency of Barack Obama saw a window of hope for itself with the coming to power of Trump, which, of course, continued to fail, as Trump gradually came to terms with the facts Iran has realized, but Pompeo, who is looking for the smallest loophole to pursue policies against Iran, is still working with Netanyahu to advance that goal.

Despite the grounds that Pompeo is constantly finding to implement his policies, in practice he has failed to make any accomplishment. For example, the basis of US foreign policy, which is the maximum pressure on Iran, has not been welcomed by EU member states, and even with the withdrawal of Trump from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action he and his colleagues could not change the European side’s view of Iran. Even during the “trigger mechanism” plan, Pompeo grabbed every thread, including the International Atomic Energy Agency, to enforce it, but the Europeans said that despite the US withdrawal from the JCPLOA this agreement with Iran must be maintained.

All this occurs while Trump and his allies thought that by leaving the JCPLOA they could put the Europeans in their line against Iran, but at the last meeting of the Security Council, which was about three weeks ago, they still failed to make any progress. The chain of failure of the US foreign policy group under Trump has gone so far that many analysts and experts now believe that, contrary to the approach of American politicians, Washington’s interests have been further jeopardized by the rise of militant figures such as Pompeo, while they wanted to take a course different from the previous politicians of this country but so far they have gained nothing but defeat.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

New EU Strategy on Cooperation with the Persian Gulf, Its Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Guest Opinion: Normalization of Iran-Saudi relations with China’s mediation, which is an indication of Beijing’s more significant influence and role in new regional trends in the Middle East, increased speculations about the possibility of changes in the geostrategy of other powers.
Abbas Aslani – Expert on international relations

Foreign Policy Challenges of the New Greek Government

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the holding of the national elections in Greece on May 21, although the winning party announced priorities of its future government to be mainly improvement of the economic situation, the continuation of the national policy in foreign relations, security, and immigration would be most important challenges for this EU and NATO member country. Although the new leaders defend the continuation of the foreign and defense policy, strengthening of the country’s armed forces, creation of solid alliances, and development of the weapons program over the past four years, they differ in the field of energy exploration, the militarization of some islands in the Aegean Sea, and the issue of refugees.
Mahmoud Fazeli – International Affairs analyst

Arming Taiwan, One of the US Pressure Levers against China

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An analyst of international affairs called the provision of various types of US military-armament aid to Taiwan one of the foundations of Washington’ towards that island and said: The Chinese have intelligently realized that the US measures must be accompanied by proportionate reactions to make them fully understand that Beijing will not sit idly by the expansion of US-Taiwan relations and the increasing dispatch of US weapons to Taiwan.

What is the new position of the dollar in the global economy?

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: The confrontation between Americanization and the Chineseization of the world has created a new acting field. While the Chinese side’s efforts to reduce the international power of the dollar and increase the global acceptance of the yuan have an increasing trend, it is not possible to correctly analyze and scenarioize the possible futures of this confrontation and the new arena of acting by relying on emotional and exaggerated reactions, and of course far from scientific neutrality.
Reza Majidzadeh—Researcher of economics

Fate of Afghanistan under Shadow of Taliban-Intl. Community Conflict

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on Afghanistan affairs, criticizing the weak role and performance of the United Nations regarding Afghanistan, emphasized: The difference of views, heterogeneous and different performances of countries regarding Afghanistan, along with the weak role of the United Nations, have completed the cycle of failure and in this situation, with the increasing risk of isolation of the Taliban, their leadership is gaining more power.

Establishing Chinese order in the region is one of the strategic goals of the Islamabad meeting

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on Asian issues considered the tripartite meeting in Islamabad regarding Afghanistan as another Chinese initiative to establish peace and stability in the region by using economic tools, adding that this meeting arose from the security concerns of Pakistan and China concerning the realization of their political and economic interests in Afghanistan.

The strategic importance of resuming relations between Iran and Egypt

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: After the resumption of diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia created a wave of positive developments in the region and encouraged other Persian Gulf countries to resume or strengthen ties with the Islamic Republic of Iran, now the news indicates that Iran and Egypt with the mediation of Iraq are trying to resume diplomatic relations.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University scholar

Strategic Importance of Organizing Legal Acceptance of Afghans in Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Former official in charge of Afghanistan Support Headquarters at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: Iranian people are witnessing the high and unusual presence of Afghan refugees, adding that vigilance is needed concerning their presence in the strategic context of cities, as well as to the possibility of targeted organization and possible use of them against the interests and security of Iran.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

New EU Strategy on Cooperation with the Persian Gulf, Its Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Guest Opinion: Normalization of Iran-Saudi relations with China’s mediation, which is an indication of Beijing’s more significant influence and role in new regional trends in the Middle East, increased speculations about the possibility of changes in the geostrategy of other powers.
Abbas Aslani – Expert on international relations

Foreign Policy Challenges of the New Greek Government

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the holding of the national elections in Greece on May 21, although the winning party announced priorities of its future government to be mainly improvement of the economic situation, the continuation of the national policy in foreign relations, security, and immigration would be most important challenges for this EU and NATO member country. Although the new leaders defend the continuation of the foreign and defense policy, strengthening of the country’s armed forces, creation of solid alliances, and development of the weapons program over the past four years, they differ in the field of energy exploration, the militarization of some islands in the Aegean Sea, and the issue of refugees.
Mahmoud Fazeli – International Affairs analyst

Arming Taiwan, One of the US Pressure Levers against China

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An analyst of international affairs called the provision of various types of US military-armament aid to Taiwan one of the foundations of Washington’ towards that island and said: The Chinese have intelligently realized that the US measures must be accompanied by proportionate reactions to make them fully understand that Beijing will not sit idly by the expansion of US-Taiwan relations and the increasing dispatch of US weapons to Taiwan.

What is the new position of the dollar in the global economy?

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: The confrontation between Americanization and the Chineseization of the world has created a new acting field. While the Chinese side’s efforts to reduce the international power of the dollar and increase the global acceptance of the yuan have an increasing trend, it is not possible to correctly analyze and scenarioize the possible futures of this confrontation and the new arena of acting by relying on emotional and exaggerated reactions, and of course far from scientific neutrality.
Reza Majidzadeh—Researcher of economics

Fate of Afghanistan under Shadow of Taliban-Intl. Community Conflict

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on Afghanistan affairs, criticizing the weak role and performance of the United Nations regarding Afghanistan, emphasized: The difference of views, heterogeneous and different performances of countries regarding Afghanistan, along with the weak role of the United Nations, have completed the cycle of failure and in this situation, with the increasing risk of isolation of the Taliban, their leadership is gaining more power.

Establishing Chinese order in the region is one of the strategic goals of the Islamabad meeting

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on Asian issues considered the tripartite meeting in Islamabad regarding Afghanistan as another Chinese initiative to establish peace and stability in the region by using economic tools, adding that this meeting arose from the security concerns of Pakistan and China concerning the realization of their political and economic interests in Afghanistan.

The strategic importance of resuming relations between Iran and Egypt

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: After the resumption of diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia created a wave of positive developments in the region and encouraged other Persian Gulf countries to resume or strengthen ties with the Islamic Republic of Iran, now the news indicates that Iran and Egypt with the mediation of Iraq are trying to resume diplomatic relations.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University scholar

Strategic Importance of Organizing Legal Acceptance of Afghans in Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Former official in charge of Afghanistan Support Headquarters at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: Iranian people are witnessing the high and unusual presence of Afghan refugees, adding that vigilance is needed concerning their presence in the strategic context of cities, as well as to the possibility of targeted organization and possible use of them against the interests and security of Iran.

Loading