Root Causes of China-India Border Tension

2020/06/15 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: Apart from what is happening in China-India-Pakistan relations, changing the equation of global power, i.e. India's proximity to the United States and that of Pakistan to China, will not be ineffective in exacerbating the China-India border crisis. Pir Mohammad Molazehi - Expert on Subcontinent Affairs

For almost a month now, severe border tensions between India and China have erupted in the Ladakh region of the Himalayas in the northern state of Jammu and Kashmir. Indian media reported, citing Indian officials that thousands of Chinese troops have entered the Galwan Valley in Ladakh. According to these reports the Chinese forces reportedly pitched tents in the area, dug trenches, and deployed heavy military equipment a few kilometers deep in what India regards its territory. China, on the other hand, says it is India that has actually changed the border equations. India has recently built a multi-hundred-kilometer road in the Ladakh region that connects land with a high-altitude air base. The base reopened in 2008.

To look at recent tensions between Beijing and Delhi, let’s take a look at the history of differences between the two countries. In 1962, a war broke out between India and China over border issues under the pretext of border disputes over the Aksai region of the Himalayas; but other factors played a role. Eventually, the Indians withdrew from the North Indian region of Kashmir and the border with Pakistan-controlled Kashmir. During the 1962 war, a portion of Kashmir was captured by China, which was later formally ceded to China under an agreement with Pakistan, but India rejected the agreement.

Border disputes between China and India have escalated after “one road, one belt” and the transfer of the port of Gwadar in Balouchistan province and in Iran’s proximity to China; The reason for this is that the Qaraqorum Road, which connects China to Gwadar, passes through the Kashmir Mountains and the disputed territory of India and Pakistan. In response to the same project, India is building an air base north of Ladakh and intends to build a military road as well. This has led to opposition from China and Pakistan, and border clashes are the result of such military moves by both sides. Because the area is mountainous and uninhabited and is for military use only, China and Pakistan are concerned about maintaining the security of the Kashgar Highway to Gwadar and are monitoring India’s military operations. India is also watching China and Pakistan. Of course, it should be noted that this state of military readiness in Kargil in 1998 was close to a full-blown war. At that time, General Pervez Musharraf threatened India with the use of nuclear weapons.

On the other hand, there are still two unresolved issues between China and India; First, the Indians claimed that Tibet belonged to India because of the Buddhist religion. China also claims about 90,000 square kilometers of border areas. This difference has remained unresolved ever since. In fact, since Rajiv Gandhi, India’s prime minister, went to China and acknowledged that Tibet belonged to China, relations between the two countries have gradually improved and reached a stage where serious negotiations have begun to resolve border issues. Following these talks, a military delegation was appointed by the Indians and a military delegation by the Chinese, and the parties began direct talks on border disputes.

As long as the National Congress Party in India was in power, this process was at least progressing well, but things have changed since the BJP came to power; Because the party had very close relations with Israel and the United States, the Chinese were skeptical of India’s position. It was later revealed that in connection with the Indian Subcontinent, the choice of the Americans was India; The choice was to the detriment of Pakistan and China. Gradually, Beijing became increasingly sensitive to the issues that India was pursuing with the United States and Israel; Therefore, apart from what is happening in China-India-Pakistan relations, changing the equation of global power, i.e. India’s proximity to the United States and that of Pakistan to China, will not be ineffective in exacerbating the border crisis between China and India.

Accordingly, two lines of thinking emerged; The first is the idea of ​​Asia-Pacific, followed by the Chinese, and the second is the idea of ​​an India Pacific, followed by the United States and India. According to this view, India has moved towards countries such as Vietnam, Thailand and countries that are considered to be in the security zone of China; So the Chinese skepticism that India has reached an agreement with the Americans, and that this understanding is to the detriment of Beijing, has caused these tensions to form now.

 

 

Especially after the United States revealed its desire for India, Pakistan also leaned toward China and distanced itself from the United States.

The combination of these developments, both at the international level and at the regional level, is an important factor in exacerbating the crisis in India-China relations.

As for the future developments, it does not seem that tensions will continue because both India and China need each other in the current situation and do not want tensions to escalate; Because some Chinese companies are involved in some of the investments made in India by multinational companies, it is not in the interest of either side to get involved.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading