loader image

Prospects of Formation of Participatory Government Plan in Afghanistan

2020/04/26 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: Following the agreement between Ashraf Ghani and Abdullah Abdullah to form a coalition government, it appears that Zalmai Khalilzad is persuading the Taliban to join the process. Pir Mohammad Molazehi - Afghanistan Affairs Expert

A spokesman for the National Islamic Movement of Afghanistan and a member of the “Stability and Convergence” campaign team recently announced plans to form a coalition government with Ashraf Ghani and said in a video message that the plan had been formulated at the request of the international community, especially the United States and following the plan prepared by Ghani for the formation of a future government by Abdullah Abdullah.

At present, Abdullah Abdullah has agreed to enter the Kabul government as the head of the Peace Council and this was arranged thanks to the efforts of Zalmai Khalilzad. In fact, with the elections held in Afghanistan and the rejection of the results by Abdullah Abdullah, he and Ashraf Ghani announced that they would form two parallel governments. Therefore, it was clear from the beginning that the formation of a government in Afghanistan had been established and that neither side was willing to step aside in favour of the other.

The reason for this is that in 2014, with the efforts and mediation of John Kerry, Abdullah Abdullah and Ashraf Ghani agreed to form a national unity government with 50 per cent of government officials coming under the control of Abdullah Abdullah and 50 per cent under President Ghani. But in fact, Ashraf Ghani did not live up to any of the promises made at the time. At present, Abdullah Abdullah and his team, especially the jihadist forces behind him, are calling for conditions to be created this time that if a compromise is forged it would be guaranteed.

In fact, because they do not trust Ashraf Ghani, they have asked the United States to guarantee this agreement. Khalilzad, meanwhile, took action when two governments were formed in Afghanistan, both of which took the oath of allegiance and began appointing cabinet members. At the same time, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo threatened that all US aid would be cut off if the political authorities in Afghanistan did not reach an agreement. As a result, political groups were forced to accept the deal.

There are several important points in this agreement that make it seem as if the Americans have guaranteed the deal. First, the main ministries and security and government authorities must be divided between the two teams. That is, Ashraf Ghani cannot appoint all the officials by himself. As for the governors, it was decided that in each district where Ashraf Ghani had the highest votes, he would appoint the governor, and in each district where Abdullah Abdullah had the highest votes, he would be appointed its governor.

Apparently, the Americans had guaranteed that this process would continue, and it was based on the guarantee that Abdullah Abdullah’s team would accept him to become the head of the Peace Council instead of the former Chief Executive Officer.

This position is also important and is considered equal to the president or at least the vice president. However, it seems that the American plan goes beyond these issues. In other words, when Khalilzad entered into negotiations with the Taliban, they concluded that US forces should withdraw from Afghanistan, and the Taliban pledged that ISIS in Afghanistan would not act against the United States and its allies in the region. It is very difficult to put this process into practice, but the Taliban are still uncertain about whether to start Afghan-Afghan talks with the central government and still stick to their former stance. In fact, the Taliban see the government dependent on the United States and are therefore unwilling to enter into negotiations with the National Unity government.

However, following the agreement between Ashraf Ghani and Abdullah Abdullah, it seems that Zalmai Khalilzad is convincing the Taliban to join the process. Finally, there are now three wings of power in Afghanistan: Abdullah Abdullah, which includes the North; Ashraf Ghani and his team, namely the Liberal Democrats; and the Taliban, which are currently outside the power circle, but Khalilzad is trying to bring them in as the third side of power. After that, the conditions for the upcoming elections will be prepared; given the conditions of the Taliban and the population behind them, if they participate in the elections and accept the national reconciliation, it is possible that the Taliban will gain political power. Meanwhile, the National Unity Government has the capacity to attract the Taliban.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Single-State, Iran’s solution to the Palestinian crisis

Strategic Council online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, in an interview with France 24 Español, explained Iran’s approach to the Gaza war and outlined the region’s future after this bitter historical event.

Organizing Immigration Issue, Cause of Escalation of Divergence in EU

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on European affairs stated that the European Union is faced with the challenge of conflict in some different opinions and policies among member countries, which can affect the overall approach to immigration in Europe. She noted that when the member states follow different paths, the principle of solidarity and cooperation of the Union is distorted and can challenge the unity of the Union.

Germany’s “New Defense Policy Guidelines”: Return of Germanic People to Age of Militarism?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: For the first time in more than a decade, Germany issued its “new defense policy guidelines,” and “Boris Pistorius,” the German Minister of Defense, asked the pillars of his country to be “ready for a war” and “capable of defense.” He has pledged to strengthen the army to become the backbone of European deterrence and collective defense.
Hamideh Safamanesh – International relations researcher

NATO’s Ambiguous Mission in Iraq New Plan for Socio-Cultural Influence

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations professor said that although NATO’s training mission for the Iraqi police forces is carried out in line with preventing ISIS from regaining power, in fact, NATO has decided to develop the scope of its mission in Iraq, noted: NATO, and the United States at its head, is looking for influence in the social body of Arab countries, especially Iraq, to advance its targets while shaping the intellectual formation and organizing the police body against the Resistance.

Consequences, Prospects of Continuation of Ground Operations of Zionist Regime in Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the continuation of the ground operations of the Zionist regime in Gaza and the success of the Hamas resistance forces in crippling their military equipment and inflicting heavy casualties on them, important questions can be raised about the prospect of that military invasion.
Hamid Khoshayand – Expert on regional affairs

France vs. Baku and Ankara in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations university professor stated that Paris is trying not to allow the situation in the Caucasus to progress as desired by the Republic of Azerbaijan and Turkey and hopes the situation can be shaped as much as possible in line with French interests through military assistance, adding: France, after Russia, is the second largest foreign investor in Armenia since 2016. This country is trying to create a rift between Armenia and Russia by strengthening ties with Armenia. France’s military support to Armenia is an important and new development that we are witnessing after the weakening of Russia’s position in Armenia.

Reasons for Ineffectiveness of Riyadh Summit Concerning Expectations of Gazans

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Recently, we witnessed an extraordinary summit of Islamic countries in Riyadh. The Palestinians, especially the people of Gaza, had built hope on the meeting, and it was expected that at the end of it, we would see a collective, serious, and deterrent decision by the Islamic countries. But, unfortunately, such expectations were not met.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University professor

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Single-State, Iran’s solution to the Palestinian crisis

Strategic Council online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, in an interview with France 24 Español, explained Iran’s approach to the Gaza war and outlined the region’s future after this bitter historical event.

Organizing Immigration Issue, Cause of Escalation of Divergence in EU

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on European affairs stated that the European Union is faced with the challenge of conflict in some different opinions and policies among member countries, which can affect the overall approach to immigration in Europe. She noted that when the member states follow different paths, the principle of solidarity and cooperation of the Union is distorted and can challenge the unity of the Union.

Germany’s “New Defense Policy Guidelines”: Return of Germanic People to Age of Militarism?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: For the first time in more than a decade, Germany issued its “new defense policy guidelines,” and “Boris Pistorius,” the German Minister of Defense, asked the pillars of his country to be “ready for a war” and “capable of defense.” He has pledged to strengthen the army to become the backbone of European deterrence and collective defense.
Hamideh Safamanesh – International relations researcher

NATO’s Ambiguous Mission in Iraq New Plan for Socio-Cultural Influence

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations professor said that although NATO’s training mission for the Iraqi police forces is carried out in line with preventing ISIS from regaining power, in fact, NATO has decided to develop the scope of its mission in Iraq, noted: NATO, and the United States at its head, is looking for influence in the social body of Arab countries, especially Iraq, to advance its targets while shaping the intellectual formation and organizing the police body against the Resistance.

Consequences, Prospects of Continuation of Ground Operations of Zionist Regime in Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the continuation of the ground operations of the Zionist regime in Gaza and the success of the Hamas resistance forces in crippling their military equipment and inflicting heavy casualties on them, important questions can be raised about the prospect of that military invasion.
Hamid Khoshayand – Expert on regional affairs

France vs. Baku and Ankara in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations university professor stated that Paris is trying not to allow the situation in the Caucasus to progress as desired by the Republic of Azerbaijan and Turkey and hopes the situation can be shaped as much as possible in line with French interests through military assistance, adding: France, after Russia, is the second largest foreign investor in Armenia since 2016. This country is trying to create a rift between Armenia and Russia by strengthening ties with Armenia. France’s military support to Armenia is an important and new development that we are witnessing after the weakening of Russia’s position in Armenia.

Reasons for Ineffectiveness of Riyadh Summit Concerning Expectations of Gazans

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Recently, we witnessed an extraordinary summit of Islamic countries in Riyadh. The Palestinians, especially the people of Gaza, had built hope on the meeting, and it was expected that at the end of it, we would see a collective, serious, and deterrent decision by the Islamic countries. But, unfortunately, such expectations were not met.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University professor

Loading