Scenarios in Afghanistan

2020/03/22 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: At present, there are three currents in Afghanistan claiming power: Abdullah Abdullah and the Jihadists, the Liberal Democrats represented by Ashraf Ghani, and the Taliban. Zalmay Khalilzad seems to be trying to balance these three currents in order to overcome the crisis in Afghanistan. Pir Mohammad Molazehi - Expert on Afghanistan

Mohammad Ashraf Ghani and Abdullah Abdullah, the two main contenders in the Afghan presidential election, were inaugurated on Monday, March 9th in concurrent ceremonies. Although the incumbent president Ashraf Ghani’s victory in the election has been formally announced, his longtime rival Abdullah Abdullah has accused Ghani of fraud and declared himself the winner.

After Abdullah announced that he will not accept the result of the election and will form a broad government, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo responded by saying that the US is opposed to parallel government in Afghanistan.

The formation of two governments is a serious debate on the future of Afghanistan, and it was Taliban’s desire to prove that the government is incapable of running the country as there is a danger that the presence of two states could lead the country to a civil war. Meantime, as we have seen, the Electoral Commission has declared Ashraf Ghani as president, and in his inauguration, foreign ambassadors including the US ambassador and NATO representatives, plus Zalmay Khalilzad, were present. However, only the Jihadist themselves were present at the inauguration of Abdullah.

Apparently two scenarios would be possible if Abdullah Abdullah and his group remained in their positions: First, they could stage massive demonstrations in Kabul and other major cities and create conditions that Ashraf Ghani would not be able to continue as president. Ultimately, the Abdullah group would drag the demonstrators to the presidential palace and oust Ashraf Ghani. Such a scenario would mean civil war because both sides are armed and cannot do so without weapons. In the current situation, they are also distributing weapons in northern Afghanistan, meaning the Jihadist forces are delivering the weapons they have concealed to their supporters.

The second scenario is that Abdullah and his group would go north and form a government there, which will also lead to the breakup of Afghanistan since the Jihadists are armed and will take up arms against the opposition. The Jihadists will also need the support of a foreign power, probably Russia to form a local power in the north. In this situation too, Russia may not be too reluctant to create a buffer zone between themselves and the Taliban; so if we look at the issue from the perspective of the danger of two states were in place, there is a very serious danger and the Taliban will derive major benefit from this. It seems that an agreement has been reached between the Taliban and the United States based on which an interim government would come to power instead of the two-state option.

As to what would be the shape of the interim government and whether Ghani or Abdullah would have a place in it, depends on whether Abdullah and Ghani and their groups can agree on a guaranteed power-sharing between them or not? Of course, this option is not very likely because one of the sides, probably Abdullah must back away, which is less likely so that a new form of a national unity government that the US had previously formulated by John Kerry would be formed.

The difference this time, of course, is that the Taliban should be part of the power too. At present, there are three currents in Afghanistan claiming power: Abdullah Abdullah and the Jihadists, the Liberal Democrats representing Ashraf Ghani, and the Taliban. Zalmay Khalilzad seems to be trying to balance these three currents to overcome the crisis in Afghanistan.

If this happens, Ashraf Ghani and the Taliban are more likely to cooperate than Abdullah Abdullah and the Taliban.

Ultimately, the US, as Mike Pompeo has stated, does not agree to form a parallel government as it will inevitably lead the US to civil war in Afghanistan. So the only way out of Afghanistan is through an agreement between the three main powers.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading